The military application of artificial intelligence (AI) is advancing far faster than global governance, with AI-assisted targeting, reconnaissance, and autonomous systems already deployed in active conflicts such as those in Ukraine and the Middle East. It not only restructures the tempo and scale of warfare but also brings profound ethical and operational risks, including algorithmic opacity and the excessive dilution of meaningful human control over lethal military decisions. Existing international humanitarian law and voluntary corporate commitments are insufficient to address these challenges. Drawing on lessons from historical arms control regimes, this article calls for an urgent global binding convention to regulate AI warfare, with scientists and international mechanisms like the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) playing key roles in promoting rule-making.

China has emerged as the world’s largest producer of scientific publications and a dominant force across high-impact research indicators. Yet, this extraordinary expansion has not translated into Nobel-level breakthroughs. This commentary examines the structural, institutional, and cultural factors underpinning this “Nobel paradox.” China’s research ecosystem is optimized for rapid scaling, publication productivity, and alignment with national policy cycles, but these strengths also generate incentives that discourage high-risk, conceptually disruptive inquiry. Comparative analysis with Japan and the United States reveals that environments producing Nobel-winning discoveries typically feature long-term stability, investigator autonomy, tolerance for failure, and mechanisms that empower early-career scientists. In China, hierarchical authorship norms, metric-driven evaluations, and risk-averse grant structures hinder the emergence of transformative ideas, despite the abundance of talent and resources. The commentary outlines reforms, such as decoupling assessment from publication metrics, creating safe harbors for high-risk research, and strengthening career pathways, that could enable China to convert its scientific capacity into world-changing discovery.