AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Analysis of occupants’ exposure risk of cough-expelled droplets in the workspace with various mixing ventilation layouts

Xiang Fang1,2Xueren Li2Yihuan Yan1( )Yao Tao1,2Ziqi Chen2Ping Yan1( )
School of Air Transportation/Flying, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China
School of Engineering, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
Show Author Information

Abstract

This study numerically investigated the transport characteristics of the cough-expelled droplets and their corresponding exposure risk of each occupant under various mixing ventilation layouts. Transient simulations were conducted in a conference room, while pathogen-bearing droplets were released by a standing speaker. The results showed that droplet residues (< 40 µm) had a high potential to reach occupant’s breathing zone, among which the number fraction of aerosol residues (< 10 µm) could be nearly doubled compared with that of the rest droplet residues in the breathing zone. Occupants’ exposure risks were found very sensitive to the ventilation layouts. The strong ventilated flow could significantly promote droplet dispersions when those inlets were closely located to the infectious speaker, resulting in all occupants exposed to a considerable fraction of aerosols and droplets within a given exposure time of 300 s. The mixing ventilation layout did not have a consistent performance on restricting the pathogen spread and controlling the occupant’s exposure risk in an enclosed workspace. Its performance could be highly sensitive to the location of the infectious agent. Centralized vent layouts could provide relatively more consistent performance on removing droplets, whilst some local airflow recirculation with locked droplets were noticed.

References

 
Allen, J. G., Ibrahim, A. M. 2021. Indoor air changes and potential implications for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. JAMA, 325: 2112–2113.
 
Anderson, E. L., Turnham, P., Griffin, J. R., Clarke, C. C. 2020. Consideration of the aerosol transmission for COVID-19 and public health. Risk Analysis, 40: 902–907.
 
ASHRAE. 2011. ASHRAE Handbook—HVAC Applications.
 
Carvalhais, C., Querido, M., Pereira, C. C., Santos, J. 2021. Biological risk assessment: A challenge for occupational safety and health practitioners during the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Work, 69: 3–13
 
Chao, C. Y. H., Wan, M. P., Morawska, L., Johnson, G. R., Ristovski, Z. D., Hargreaves, M., Mengersen, K., Corbett, S., Li, Y., Xie, X., et al. 2009. Characterization of expiration air jets and droplet size distributions immediately at the mouth opening. Journal of Aerosol Science, 40: 122–133.
 
Chen, Q. 1995. Comparison of different kε models for indoor air flow computations. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 28: 353–369.
 
Fan, Y., Li, X., Yan, Y., Tu, J. 2017. Overall performance evaluation of underfloor air distribution system with different heights of return vents. Energy and Buildings, 147: 176–187.
 
Greenhalgh, T., Jimenez, J. L., Prather, K. A., Tufekci, Z., Fisman, D., Schooley, R. 2021. Ten scientific reasons in support of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The Lancet, 397: 1603–1605.
 
Gupta, J. K., Lin, C. H., Chen, Q. 2009. Flow dynamics and characterization of a cough. Indoor Air, 19: 517–525.
 
Johns Hopkins University. 2020. COVID-19 dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). Available at https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.
 
Katella, K. 2021. Comparaing the COVID-19 vaccines: How are they different? Available at https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-vaccine-comparison.
 
Licina, D., Pantelic, J., Melikov, A., Sekhar, C., Tham, K. W. 2014. Experimental investigation of the human convective boundary layer in a quiescent indoor environment. Building and Environment, 75: 79–91.
 
Lipinski, T., Ahmad, D., Serey, N., Jouhara, H. 2020. Review of ventilation strategies to reduce the risk of disease transmission in high occupancy buildings. International Journal of Thermofluids, 7–8: 100045.
 
Lu, J., Gu, J., Li, K., Xu, C., Su, W., Lai, Z., Zhou, D., Yu, C., Xu, B., Yang, Z. 2020. COVID-19 outbreak associated with air conditioning in restaurant, Guangzhou, China, 2020. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 26: 1628–1631.
 
Miller, S. L., Nazaroff, W. W., Jimenez, J. L., Boerstra, A., Buonanno, G., Dancer, S. J., Kurnitski, J., Marr, L. C., Morawska, L., Noakes, C. 2021. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by inhalation of respiratory aerosol in the Skagit Valley Chorale superspreading event. Indoor Air, 31: 314–323.
 
Mittal, R., Ni, R., Seo, J. H. 2020. The flow physics of COVID-19. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 894: F2.
 
Motamedi, H., Shirzadi, M., Tominaga, Y., Mirzaei, P. A. 2022. CFD modeling of airborne pathogen transmission of COVID-19 in confined spaces under different ventilation strategies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76: 103397.
 
Nicas, M., Nazaroff, W. W., Hubbard, A. 2005. Toward understanding the risk of secondary airborne infection: Emission of respirable pathogens. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2: 143–154.
 
Peng, S., Chen, Q., Liu, E. 2020. The role of computational fluid dynamics tools on investigation of pathogen transmission: Prevention and control. Science of The Total Environment, 746: 142090.
 
Riediker, M., Briceno-Ayala, L., Ichihara, G., Albani, D., Poffet, D., Tsai, D. H., Iff, S., Monn, C. 2022. Higher viral load and infectivity increase risk of aerosol transmission for Delta and Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2. Swiss Medical Weekly, 152: w30133.
 
Sheriff, R. E. 2020. Building ventilation – The proper air changes per hour (ACH). Available at https://www.atlenv.com/building-ventilation-the-proper-air-changes-per-hour-ach.
 
Sohrabi, C., Alsafi, Z., O'Neill, N., Khan, M., Kerwan, A., Al-Jabir, A., Iosifidis, C., Agha, R. 2020. World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). International Journal of Surgery, 76: 71–76.
 
Wang, C. C., Prather, K. A., Sznitman, J., Jimenez, J. L., Lakdawala, S. S., Tufekci, Z., Marr, L. C. 2021. Airborne transmission of respiratory viruses. Science, 373: eabd9149.
 
Wei, J., Li, Y. 2015. Enhanced spread of expiratory droplets by turbulence in a cough jet. Building and Environment, 93: 86–96.
 
World Health Organization. ‎2020a‎. Coronavirus disease (‎COVID-19)‎ outbreak: Rights, roles and responsibilities of health workers, including key considerations for occupational safety and health: Interim guidance. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331510.
 
World Health Organization. 2020b. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: Implications for infection prevention precautions. Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/transmission-of-sars-cov-2-implications-for-infection-prevention-precautions.
 
World Health Organization. 2021. Advice for the public: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Available at https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public.
 
Yan, Y., Li, X., Yang, L., Tu, J. 2016. Evaluation of manikin simplification methods for CFD simulations in occupied indoor environments. Energy and Buildings, 127: 611–626.
Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow
Pages 389-398
Cite this article:
Fang X, Li X, Yan Y, et al. Analysis of occupants’ exposure risk of cough-expelled droplets in the workspace with various mixing ventilation layouts. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2022, 4(4): 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-022-0142-x

533

Views

11

Crossref

10

Web of Science

10

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 11 July 2022
Accepted: 21 July 2022
Published: 18 August 2022
© Tsinghua University Press 2022
Return