Despite the importance of standardized terminology, few rigorous studies have addressed the issue of classification in disaster management. This study aims to balance classification by emphasizing both comprehensiveness and simplicity, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness of disaster management practices. A systematic literature review serves as the primary methodology. The study compares partially exclusive and overlapping classifications with fully inclusive and non-overlapping classifications, using five key terms: major stakeholders, hazards, risks, disaster management cycle, and emergency support functions. A core principle is that stakeholders will transform partially exclusive and overlapping classifications into fully inclusive and non-overlapping ones, while incorporating the direct and indirect impacts of classification, the broader Earth community, public awareness, emergency training, and other factors. This study presents a more balanced perspective on classification than previous research.