The aim of this study was to compare the effects of percussive massage treatment and static stretching on muscle tone, stiffness, and strength recovery following exercise fatigue. Sixty subjects were randomly divided into three groups: a control group (CG, n=20), a static stretching group (SSG, n = 20), and a percussive massage treatment group (PMTG, n = 20). Following exercise-induced muscle fatigue, interventions were applied, including supine rest, static stretching, and percussive massage treatment. Muscle tone, stiffness, and muscle strength indicators were assessed at five time points: before the exercise (Pre-exercise), immediately after exercise (Post-exercise), immediately after therapy intervention (Post-0), 24 hours (h) after therapy intervention (Post-24 h), and 48 h after therapy intervention (Post-48 h).

At Post-0, muscle tone and stiffness in both the control group and static stretching group were significantly higher than Pre-exercise, while in the percussive massage treatment group, there were no statistically significant differences compared to Pre-exercise. At Post-48 h, peak torque in the control group was significantly lower than Pre-exercise. In contrast, the percussive massage treatment group and static stretching group showed no significant differences at Post-48 h compared to Pre-exercise. These findings indicated that percussive massage therapy is immediately effective in mitigating muscle tone and stiffness after exercise fatigue, whereas static stretching and percussive massage therapy facilitate the recovery of muscle strength within 48 h.