Alberto Marín-Galindo, Edgardo Opazo-Diaz, Miguel Ramirez-Jimenez, Adrián Montes-de-Oca-García,
Juan Corral-Pérez, Alejandro Perez-Bey, Cristina Casals, Jesus G. Ponce-Gonzalez
Sports Medicine and Health Science 2026, 8(3): 327-334
Published: 21 February 2025
BackgroundMeasuring maximal fat oxidation (MFO) and maximal oxygen consumption typically requires two separate days, which can be time-consuming. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a single-day test for measuring MFO and in individuals with pre-diabetes/type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
MethodsTwenty adults with pre-diabetes/T2DM (10 women; [53.1 ± 8.8] years) participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants underwent a single-day MFO- protocol, followed by the traditional test on a cycle ergometer 4–7 days later, with both assessments performed using indirect calorimetry. The single-day test commenced with the MFO test, involving 15 W per 3 min increments until the respiratory exchange rate reached 1.0. After a 5-minute (min) rest, the test was conducted, starting at the last load and increasing by 15 W·min-1 until voluntary exhaustion. The traditional test involved a 15 W·min-1n incremental protocol until voluntary exhaustion, followed by a verification test at 110% of the previous maximum load.
ResultsNo significant differences were observed between and traditional protocol in values ([2099.4 ± 534.1] ml·min-1 vs. [2119.1 ± 548.3] ml·min-1, p = 0.715) or heart rate ([163.2 ± 18.2] beat/min vs. [164.5 ± 16.1] beat/min, p = 0.485). The protocol test demonstrated excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.957), limits of agreement ranging from 300.06 ml·min-1 to −306.77 ml·min-1, and the standard error of measurement was 181.67 ml·min-1.
ConclusionsTherefore, the single-day test is a valid and reliable method for assessing both MFO and in men and women with pre-diabetes/T2DM. With a mean total duration of (34 ± 8) min, this test enhances clinical applicability by significantly reducing the time and cost associated with traditional assessments.