Publications
Sort:
Open Access Original Article Issue
Comparison of maximal strength, muscle morphology, and motor unit recruitment and firing rate patterns of the abductor digiti minimi in normal-fat and over-fat males
Sports Medicine and Health Science 2026, 8(2): 163-171
Published: 27 February 2025
Abstract PDF (2.4 MB) Collect
Downloads:3
Purpose

This study examined potential differences in strength, muscle morphology, and motor unit (MU) behavior of the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) between normal-fat (NF) and over-fat (OF) males.

Methods

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessed percent body fat (%BF). Ultrasonography determined muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), echo intensity (EI), and subcutaneous fat (sFAT). MU behavior was assessed during isometric muscle actions at 50% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) by analyzing the y-intercepts and slopes for the MU action potential amplitude (MUAPAMP) vs. recruitment threshold (RT) relationships, the A and B terms for the mean firing rate (MFR) vs. RT relationships, and normalized electromyographic amplitude (N-EMGRMS). MU firing times and waveforms were validated with reconstruct-and-test and spike trigger average procedures.

Results

%BF was greater for OF (25.70% ​± ​5.40%) than NF (16.50% ​± ​2.20%; p < 0.001). MVC was greater for NF (27.13 ​± ​7.16) N than OF ([19.89 ​± ​4.96] N; p ​= ​0.014). CSA was greater for NF (2.48 ​± ​0.39) cm2 than OF ([1.95 ​± ​0.47] cm2; p ​= ​0.011). The y-intercepts for the MUAPAMP vs. RT relationships were greater for NF (0.283 ​± ​0.254) mV than OF ([-0.221 ​± ​0.659] mV; p ​= ​0.004). The B terms for the MFR vs. RT relationships were greater for NF (−0.024 ​± ​0.003) pps/%MVC than OF ([-0.031 ​± ​0.009] pps/%MVC; p ​= ​0.038). N-EMGRMS was similar between groups (p ​= ​0.463).

Conclusion

Maximal strength, muscle size, and MU recruitment and firing rate patterns for a non-weight bearing muscle differed between normal-fat and over-fat males.

Open Access Original Article Issue
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation producing low evoked force elicits the repeated bout effect on muscle damage markers of the elbow flexors
Sports Medicine and Health Science 2025, 7(2): 124-131
Published: 25 April 2024
Abstract PDF (917.6 KB) Collect
Downloads:2

This study examined the repeated bout effect (RBE) on muscle damage markers following two bouts of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in untrained individuals. Following familiarization, participants received 45 consecutive NMES to the biceps brachii at an intensity that produced low evoked force for the elbow flexors. Muscle damage markers (maximal voluntary isometric contraction [MVIC], elbow range of motion [ROM], muscle soreness via visual analogue scale [VAS] scores, pressure pain threshold [PPT], and muscle thickness) were measured before (PRE), after (POST), 1 day after (24 POST), and 2 days after (48 POST) NMES. Following 1 week of rest, procedures were replicated. Separate repeated measures two-way ANOVAs examined each measure. There were no interactions or bout main effects for MVIC or ROM. Time main effects indicated PRE MVIC was greater than POST (p ​= ​0.002) and 24-POST (p ​= ​0.024), and PRE ROM was greater than POST (p ​= ​0.036). There was no interaction for muscle thickness. Respective time and bout main effects indicated muscle thickness at PRE was less than POST (p ​= ​0.017), and second-bout muscle thickness (p ​= ​0.050) was less compared to the initial-bout. For PPT, there was an interaction (p ​= ​0.019). Initial-bout PRE PPT was less than POST (p ​= ​0.033). Initial-bout 48-POST PPT was less than second-bout 48-POST (p ​= ​0.037). There was a significant interaction for VAS (p ​= ​0.009). Initial-bout PRE VAS was less than POST (p ​= ​0.033) and 24-POST (p ​= ​0.015). Initial-bout POST and 24-POST VAS were greater than second-bout POST (p ​= ​0.023) and 24-POST (p ​= ​0.006), respectively. The results support RBE on muscle damage markers related to inflammation, but not MVIC and ROM.

Total 2