Publications
Sort:
Issue
Effects of Partial Organic Fertilizer Substitution and Plastic Film Mulching on Root Growth, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency of Spring Wheat in Dryland
Scientia Agricultura Sinica 2026, 59(11): 2340-2357
Published: 01 June 2026
Abstract PDF (1.3 MB) Collect
Downloads:0
Objective

This study aimed to investigate the regulatory mechanisms of partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer and plastic film mulching on yield and water use efficiency (WUE) of spring wheat in dryland, and to provide a theoretical basis for high-yield and efficient production of spring wheat in the rainfed farming areas of the Loess Plateau.

Method

A field experiment was conducted in Dingxi city, Gansu province, from 2023 to 2025, with four treatments established: chemical fertilizer only (NP, supplying 105 kg·N hm-2 and 105 kg P2O5·hm-2), partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer(MNP, supplying 80 kg N·hm-2 and 88 kg P2O5·hm-2, plus 8500 kg·hm-2 of composted sheep manure, corresponding to approximately 23.8% and 16.2% substitution of chemical N and P2O5, respectively), chemical fertilizer combined with plastic film mulching (FNP), and the combined application of organic substitution and film mulching (FMNP). The effects of these treatments on root traits, stage-specific water use, dry matter accumulation, yield, and water use efficiency (WUE) of spring wheat were investigated.

Result

Film mulching treatments (FNP and FMNP) significantly enhanced soil water storage at sowing compared to non-mulched treatments (NP and MNP), with an average increase of 23.7 mm. In contrast, organic substitution without film mulching (MNP) did not exert a significant effect on soil water storage. Relative to NP treatment, FNP and FMNP significantly increased root length density in the 0-20 cm soil layer at maturity by 25.7% and 22.0%, and in the 60-140 cm layer by 33.7% and 45.9%, respectively. Water consumption during the jointing-flowering stage was significantly increased by 16.8% and 24.5%, and the stage-specific water use efficiency was correspondingly enhanced by 34.3% and 35.0% for FNP and FMNP compared to NP. Leaf area index (LAI) was significantly elevated by 12.5%, 30.2%, and 38.7% for MNP, FNP, and FMNP, respectively, compared with NP. Moreover, aboveground dry matter accumulation at maturity was significantly increased by 35.1% and 40.5% for FNP and FMNP, respectively, averaged over the two-year period. Compared with the NP treatment, the FNP and FMNP treatments significantly increased grain yield by 47.0% and 58.7%, respectively, and water use efficiency for grain yield (WUEg) by 31.3% and 41.7% on average, respectively. In contrast, the MNP treatment did not significantly improve grain yield or WUEg relative to NP. Random forest and structural equation modeling analyses indicated that the combined application of organic substitution and film mulching affected root traits, which in turn regulated stage-specific water use and dry matter partitioning, thereby significantly influencing yield and WUEg.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate that the integration of partial organic fertilizer substitution with plastic film mulching optimizes root architecture, enhances water use during the jointing-flowering stage, increases biomass accumulation, reduces the root-to-shoot ratio, and promotes the allocation of photosynthetic assimilates to grains, ultimately improving both grain yield and water use efficiency of spring wheat in dryland.

Issue
Effects of Different Carbon Returning Methods on Grain Yield, Quality and Water Use Efficiency of Maize in Dryland of the Loess Plateau
Scientia Agricultura Sinica 2025, 58(14): 2751-2765
Published: 16 July 2025
Abstract PDF (681.4 KB) Collect
Downloads:16
【Objective】

This study aimed to investigate the response of maize grain yield, quality and water use efficiency (WUE) in the dryland of the Loess Plateau to different ways of carbon returning, and to provide a theoretical basis for high-yield and high-efficiency cultivation of maize in this region.

【Method】

A maize field experiment was carried out in Dingxi City, Gansu Province, from 2022 to 2023, with one no-carbon returning and four different carbon-increasing treatments of equal carbon amounts: CK, control treatment without carbon returning; S1, biochar returning treatment (0.5×104 kg·hm-2); S2, straw returning treatment (1.2×104 kg·hm-2); S3, organic returning treatment (2.0×104 kg·hm-2); S4: 50% straw returning (0.6×104 kg·hm-2) combined with 50% organic returning treatment (1.0×104 kg·hm-2) to study the effects of carbon returning methods on soil moisture, dry matter accumulation and translocation, yield, water use efficiency and grain quality of maize in dryland of Loess Plateau.

【Result】

Carbon returning treatments reduced soil bulk weight and increased soil porosity in the 0-30 cm soil layer, where S1 treatment significantly increased soil water content in the 0-300 cm soil layer compared with CK treatment. Compared with the CK treatment, S1 treatment significantly decreased the SPAD value and leaf area index (LAI) at flowering stage, whereas S2, S3 and S4 treatments significantly increased the LAI of maize. The aboveground dry matter accumulation at harvest and the maximum rate of dry matter accumulation under S2, S3 and S4 treatment were significantly increased by 10.83%-21.05% and 8.47%-17.13%, respectively, while the dry matter accumulation of maize after anthesis and the contribution of post-flowering dry matter to grain yield significantly increased by 28.58%-54.02% and 11.18%-19.43%, respectively. And then, maize yields significantly increased by 17.22%-29.66%, with S3 demonstrating the most pronounced yield improvement. Conversely, compared with CK, S1 treatment significantly reduced the maximum rate of dry matter accumulation and dry matter accumulation at harvest by 5.31% and 10.32%, respectively, and then decreased grain yield by 7.05%. The S3 treatment significantly increased water use efficiency for grain yield by 23.71% relative to CK, while S1, S2, and S4 showed no significant differences in water use efficiency when compared with CK. Furthermore, compared with CK, S2 treatment significantly reduced grain protein content, while S2, S3, and S4 significantly decreased grain cellulose content. In contrast, S1 treatment significantly increased grain cellulose content compared with CK treatment.

【Conclusion】

Under carbon applications of 0.5×104 kg C·hm-2, organic manure application was more effective in improving maize yield and water use efficiency than straw return and biochar return.

Total 2