The role of postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) in stage IIA gastric cancer remains controversial. In this population‐based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program analysis of 2420 patients, long‐term outcomes were compared between those who received POCT (n = 602) and those who did not (n = 1818). Over a median follow‐up of 118 months, POCT was associated with improved overall survival and disease‐specific survival (DSS) in the unadjusted cohort. After propensity score matching, the overall survival benefit persisted (p = 0.012), whereas the difference in DSS was no longer statistically significant (p = 0.113). Exploratory subgroup analyses indicated that patients with intestinal‐type histology, non‐signet ring cell carcinoma, well to moderately differentiated tumors (grade Ⅰ–Ⅱ), or tumor size < 4 cm did not demonstrate a significant DSS benefit from POCT. These findings question the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIA disease and support a risk‐adapted approach in which POCT may be omitted in selected patients with favorable tumor biology.
- Article type
- Year
Open Access
Short Communication
Issue
Open Access
Original Article
Issue
This research aimed to develop an innovative predictive model for estimating overall survival (OS) in patients with ampullary carcinoma and to evaluate the clinical benefits of postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) tailored to individual risk profiles.
Data from patients with ampullary carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable analysis identified key prognostic factors, which were incorporated into a predictive nomogram. The impact of POCT on OS was assessed within risk groups stratified by the nomogram.
Data for 3921 patients were included, with 2744 in the training cohort and 1177 in the validation cohort. A nomogram incorporating age, sex, tumor grade, T stage, N stage, and tumor size outperformed the TNM staging system, with areas under the curve for 3-year, 5-year, and 8-year OS of 0.755 vs 0.687, 0.752 vs 0.694, and 0.750 vs 0.694, respectively, in the training cohort and 0.705 vs 0.664, 0.717 vs 0.679, and 0.734 vs 0.703 in the validation cohort. Calibration plots showed excellent agreement between predicted and observed survival outcomes. Decision curve analysis indicated a net benefit across threshold probabilities above that of TNM staging. Risk stratification based on the model indicated that high-risk patients had a significantly increased mortality risk ( p < 0.001). Notably, POCT significantly improved OS in high-risk patients ( p < 0.001) but not in low-risk patients.
Not all patients benefit from POCT. The proposed nomogram predicts survival effectively and can guide treatment decisions, optimizing outcomes by providing additional chemotherapy for high-risk patients while sparing low-risk patients from unnecessary treatment.
京公网安备11010802044758号