Sort:
Open Access Clinical Study Issue
A study of the maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness using cone-beam CT
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases 2021, 29(11): 761-765
Published: 20 November 2021
Abstract PDF (1 MB) Collect
Downloads:0
Objective

To investigate the relationship between the thickness of the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus and patient age and sex at different tooth sites to provide a reference for sinus floor elevations.

Methods

Cone-beam CT (CBCT)imaging data were collected from 222 patients admitted to the Department of Stomatology, the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, from March 2020 to October 2020. The thicknesses of the maxillary sinus lateral wall of the first premolar, second premolar, first molar and second molar were observed and measured on the coronal plane of CBCT images, and the relationship between the maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness and patient sex was analyzed. The patients were divided into the following groups according to their age: ①the young group (18~29 years old),②the middle-aged group (30~59 years old), and ③the elderly group (≥ 60 years old). The difference in the maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness was compared among these three age groups.

Results

The mean thicknesses of the maxillary sinus lateral wall at the first premolar, second premolar, first molar and second molar were (1.61 ± 0.58) mm,(1.68 ± 0.66) mm, (2.00 ± 0.76) mm and (1.71 ± 0.71) mm, respectively. The maximum thickness of the lateral wall was located at the first molar (P < 0.05). The thickness of the maxillary sinus lateral wall in the young group was significantly thicker than that in the middle-aged group and the elderly group at the first premolar and first molar (P < 0.05). The thickness of the maxillary sinus lateral wall in males was significantly thicker than that in females at the second molar [(1.78 ± 0.80) mm vs. (1.63 ± 0.62) mm, P=0.029].

Conclusion

The mean thickness of the lateral wall changes at different reference points. The maxillary sinus lateral wall is the thickest at M1. The thickness of the maxillary sinus lateral wall decreased with age, and the thickness of the lateral wall was higher in males than in females.

Open Access Clinical Study Issue
Correlation between periodontal status of maxillary molars and maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases 2025, 33(5): 368-376
Published: 20 May 2025
Abstract PDF (21.1 MB) Collect
Downloads:21
Objective

To investigate the effect of periodontal inflammation of maxillary molars on the mucosal thickening of the maxillary sinus and to provide references for the prevention and treatment of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis.

Methods

This study was approved by the hospital’s Medical Ethics committee. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the cone beam CT (CBCT) images of the maxillary sinuses of 246 patients with periodontitis. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 331 maxillary sinus images were finally included. The molars with the most severe periodontal inflammation were selected for statistical analysis, including 270 first molars and 61 second molars. CBCT images of these patients were collected. Periodontal indices of maxillary molars [minimum remaining alveolar bone height (minRABH), degree of alveolar bone absorption, furcation involvement, and vertical bone loss] were measured. The correlation between these periodontal indices and maxillary sinus mucosal thickening (defined as normal when the maximum thickness of the maxillary sinus mucosa ≤ 2 mm and thickening when>2 mm) was analyzed.

Results

Among the 331 maxillary molars and their corresponding maxillary sinuses, 264 cases showed thickening of the maxillary sinus mucosa, with an average thickness of (5.9 ± 5.1) mm, accounting for 79.8%. The thickening of the maxillary sinus mucosa was significantly correlated with periodontal indices, including minRABH, degree of alveolar bone absorption, furcation involvement, and vertical bone loss (P<0.05), as well as with tooth position (P<0.05). Further binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the possibility of maxillary sinus mucosal thickening in the minRABH<4 mm group was 5.6 times that of the group with minRABH ≥ 10 mm. The possibility of maxillary sinus mucosal thickening in the group with minRABH of 4-10 mm was 2.2 times that of the group with minRABH ≥ 10 mm. The possibility of maxillary sinus mucosal thickening caused by periodontitis in the second maxillary molar was 2.8 times that of the first maxillary molar. minRABH and tooth position of the maxillary molar had a more significant impact on the thickening of the maxillary sinus mucosa compared to other factors (P<0.05).

Conclusion

When the minRABH of maxillary molars is less than 4 mm or when the tooth position is the second maxillary molar, the possibility of thickening of the maxillary sinus mucosa increases. This suggests that thorough periodontal treatment is an important factor in preventing odontogenic maxillary sinusitis.

Total 2