Sort:
Open Access Full Length Article Issue
Aerodynamic configuration of a wide-range reversible vehicle
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 2025, 38(4)
Published: 24 September 2024
Abstract Collect

The design of wide-range high-efficiency aerodynamic configurations is one of the most important key technologies in the research of near-space hypersonic vehicles. A double-sided intake configuration with different inlets on the upper and lower surfaces is proposed to adapt to wide-range flight. Firstly, the double-sided intake configuration’s design method and flight profile are delineated. Secondly, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) numerical simulation based on multi-Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) parallel computing is adopted to evaluate the vehicle’s performance comprehensively, aiming to verify the feasibility of the proposed scheme. This evaluation encompasses a wide-range basic aerodynamic characteristics, inlet performance, and heat flux at critical locations. The results show that the inlets of the designed integration configuration can start up across Mach number 3.5 to 8. The vehicle possesses multi-point cruising capability by flipping the fuselage. Simultaneously, a 180°rotation of the fuselage can significantly decrease the heat accumulation on the lower surface of the vehicle, particularly at the inlet lip, further decreasing the temperature gradient across the vehicle structure. This study has some engineering value for the aerodynamic configuration design of wide-range vehicles. However, further study reveals that the flow phenomena at the intersection of two inlets are complex, posing potential adverse impacts on propulsion efficiency. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct additional research to delve into this matter comprehensively.

Open Access Research Article Issue
Drag and heat reduction performance of a dual-jet spike configuration in hypersonic flow
Acta Aerodynamica Sinica 2024, 42(2): 34-46
Published: 09 June 2023
Abstract PDF (6.5 MB) Collect
Downloads:11

High aerodynamic drag and severe aeroheating are the two most important factors impeding the development of hypersonic vehicles. Thus, how to reduce the drag and heat flux effectively in hypersonic flight has attracted worldwide attention. In this paper, a novel strategy combining a spike and a dual-jet has been proposed for the drag reduction and thermal protection. In this configuration, the reaction force generated by the root jet can balance the additional resistance of the rear jet, and the surface heat flux of the vehicle can also be reduced effectively. The flow characteristics and the drag/heat reduction efficiency is explored by numerical simulations. Meanwhile, the influence of the spike length and the total jet pressure on the drag and heat flux are quantitatively analyzed. The results reveal that flow structures of the dual-jet spike configuration are significantly changed, and the drag and heat reduction efficient is greatly improved compared to the cases with a single jet or without any jet. In addition, increasing the spike length ratio (L/D) is beneficial to improve the drag reduction performance, but has a negative effect on the thermal protection. Specifically, by increasing the spike length, from L/D = 1 to L/D = 4, the drag coefficient of the dual-jet spike configuration is decreased by 71.9%, while the total heat flux on the blunt body is increased by 13.7 times. On the other hand, the wall heat flux can be remarkably reduced by increasing the total jet pressure, and it becomes negative when the total pressure ratio of the opposing jet (PR, o) or that of the rear jet (PR, r) is larger than 0.4. However, the variation tendency of the drag coefficient with the increasing of PR, o and PR, r is completely opposite. Due to the drag induced by the opposing jet, the total drag coefficient of the dual-jet spike configuration is increased by 66.7% from PR, o = 0.2 to PR, o = 0.5. On the contrary, thanks to the thrust generated by the rear jet, the total drag coefficient of the dual-jet spike configuration is decreased by 59.3% from PR, r = 0.2 to PR, r = 0.5.

Total 2