Dynamic surgical navigation system has been wildly used in implantology, the navigation surgical system provide preoperative trajectory planning. Moreover, the constant visualization of drilling trajectory during operation assist the operators by avoiding critical anatomic structures to achieve safer surgery. Our article focuses on the development and function of dynamic navigation system to evaluate the accuracy of dynamic surgical navigation system when used for regular implants and zygomatic implants placement. We aim to discuss the accuracy of different brand of dynamic surgical navigation systems for implants placement and to investigate the main reasons led the inaccurate outcome.

Edentulous patients often present with severe alveolar bone resorption, restructured maxillofacial anatomy, and loss of occlusal relationships, making implant-supported rehabilitation technically more challenging—particularly in terms of guide stability, implant positioning accuracy, and prosthesis design. Traditional treatment workflows largely rely on clinician experience, which is inherently subjective and limits the ability to achieve precise, controlled implant placement and predictable restorative outcomes. In recent years, the widespread adoption of digital technologies has brought transformative progress to implantology for edentulous jaws. Innovations span from preoperative imaging and 3D reconstruction, intelligent surgical planning, personalized guide design, dynamic navigation, and robotic-assisted implant placement, to digital prosthesis design and immediate loading protocols. These advancements have markedly improved surgical precision, procedural efficiency, and patient satisfaction. This article systematically reviews the key applications and clinical value of digital technologies across the various stages of implant rehabilitation in edentulous cases. We also highlight current challenges, such as high costs and dependence on specialized equipment. Finally, we explore future directions toward more intelligent and integrated solutions that are driven by advances in artificial intelligence, multimodal image fusion, and robotics.

In the field of oral medicine, 3D-printed individualized titanium mesh technology is gradually becoming an important means for the treatment of severe alveolar bone defect augmentation. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the advantages of this technology, the evaluation of osteogenic effects, and the progress of research in clinical applications. In response to the current issue of variability in bone augmentation outcomes, this paper delves into multiple factors affecting bone augmentation effects, including individualized titanium mesh design (involving the thickness, pore size, pore shape, porosity, contour shape, selection of titanium alloy materials, and 3D printing technology), intraoperative procedures (the accuracy of placement during 3D-printed individualized titanium mesh surgery), and postoperative care (including the prevention of complications, formation of pseudoperiosteum, and stability of the titanium mesh). By integrating the clinical experience and research findings of our team, we propose a series of targeted optimization strategies, including designing, manufacturing, and clinically applying self-positioning individualized titanium meshs (positioning wings + individualized titanium meshs) to improve the positioning accuracy of the titanium mesh; propose individualized treatment processes and titanium mesh design schemes based on specific conditions of alveolar bone defects and soft tissue status; and emphasize the importance of long-term stable fixation of the titanium mesh to reduce the risk of postoperative mesh loosening and displacement. In addition, we appropriately summarize the evaluation methods for the bone augmentation effects of 3D-printed individualized titanium meshes, covering the following key indicators: (1) vertical bone augmentation and horizontal bone augmentation; (2) changes in bone contour morphology; (3) bone volume increase; (4) clinical indicators (surgical success rate, titanium mesh exposure, infection rate, and postoperative recovery); (5) aesthetic effect evaluation; (6) long-term stability; (7) radiological assessment; (8) patient satisfaction; and (9) precision of surgical operation, aiming to assist doctors in comprehensively assessing and in-depth analyzing the surgical outcomes to achieve the best therapeutic effects. The purpose of this article is to provide a reference for the optimization and clinical application of 3D-printed individualized titanium mesh technology and to lay a theoretical foundation for achieving the best osteogenic effects.