Sort:
Open Access Research Article Issue
An application strategy of combined controlled-release fertilizers can balance the yield and quality of soft wheat while meeting its nutrient requirements
Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA) 2026, 25(7): 2783-2795
Published: 20 February 2025
Abstract PDF (1.6 MB) Collect
Downloads:2

The application of slow-controlled release fertilizer is a simple and labor-saving cultivation technology that can improve the yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of wheat, although research on the impact of a single application of controlled-release nitrogen (N) fertilizers with different release periods on wheat grain quality is still limited. In this study, urease inhibitor urea (AHA), sulfur-coated urea (SCU), a combination of SCU and AHA fertilizer (BSAF) and blended slow-controlled release fertilizer (BRNF) were used to investigate the effect of slow-controlled release fertilizers on the nutrient release, grain yield, NUE, and protein content of soft wheat. The goal was to determine the effect of a one-time application of controlled release fertilizer on wheat grain yield and protein content and its underlying mechanisms. The results showed that the different slow-controlled release fertilizer treatments had significantly different N release rates. AHA presented a fast release mode, while SCU and BSAF presented slow-release modes, and BRNF presented a controlled release mode. Compared with CK, BRNF increased grain yield and reduced the protein content of soft wheat, with an average increase of 6.73% in grain yield and a reduction of 1.85% in protein content. The higher N absorption of BRNF led to greater NUE, N agronomic efficiency (NAE) and N apparent recovery fraction (NRF). However, AHA, SCU and BSAF all showed the opposite trend. Compared with CK, BRNF improved post-anthesis dry matter accumulation (PDMA) and the contribution rate of dry matter accumulated post-anthesis to the grain (CDA), while reducing post-anthesis N accumulation (PNA) and the contribution rate of post-anthesis N accumulation to grain (CNA). The main reasons for the improvement in yield and reduction in protein content were related to the increases in PDMA and CDA, and the reductions in PNA and CNA, respectively. Therefore, BRNF is an effective agronomic strategy for promoting the coordination of grain yield and quality in soft wheat.

Issue
Analysis of American Soft Wheat Grain Quality and Its Suitability Evaluation According to Chinese Weak Gluten Wheat Standard
Scientia Agricultura Sinica 2022, 55(19): 3723-3737
Published: 01 October 2022
Abstract PDF (1.2 MB) Collect
Downloads:12
【Objective】

The consumption of biscuits in China is increasing yearly, but soft wheat, the material for making biscuits, has been in shortage for a long time. American soft wheat is of stable quality and excellent processing performance, and is welcomed by Chinese processing enterprises. This study on the interannual dynamic change of grain quality and the relationship between quality indexes of American soft red winter and soft white wheat in multiple years could provide the reference for Chinese weak gluten wheat production.

【Method】

Based on the quality data of soft wheat published by American Wheat Association from 1999 to 2019, the correlation analysis and cluster analysis were used to analyze the relationship among wheat grain, flour, dough and baking quality, and the fitness of American soft wheat quality to the existing weak gluten wheat standard in China was also analyzed.

【Result】

For grain quality, the mean value of grain protein content (GPC, %), hardness (H), test weight (TW, g·L-1) and 1000-grain weight (TKW, g) of soft red winter wheat was lower than that of soft white wheat. The annual variation of quality indexes showed: H>TKW>GPC>TW. For flour quality, the wet gluten content (WG, %) of two kinds of soft wheat were about 22%. Four kinds of solvent retention capacity (SRC, %) of soft red winter wheat were higher than or similar to soft white wheat, while the WG, sedimentation value and four kinds SRC of soft red winter wheat had lower variation coefficients. For dough quality, the development time, stability time (ST, min), alveograph P, L, W value and extensograph parameters of soft red winter wheat were lower than those of soft white wheat, and their water absorption (WA, %) was about 52%. The variation coefficients of farinograph, alveograph and extensograph parameters of soft red winter wheat were lower. According to Chinese weak gluten wheat standard GB 17320-2013, the reaching rate of GPC, WG and ST in soft red winter wheat were 100%, 100% and 57.1%, respectively. The reaching rates of GPC, WG and ST in soft white wheat were 90.5%, 95.2% and 38.1%, respectively. Under GB 17893-1999, GPC, WG and ST of two kinds of soft wheat were as follows: GPC<WG<ST, and the reaching rate was less than 70%. Correlation analysis of soft white wheat showed that there was a significantly negative correlation between TKW and GPC, WG, sucrose SRC, H and WG, while a significant positive correlation was found between GPC and WG, sucrose, lactic acid SRC, sucrose SRC and alveograph W, lactic acid SRC and extensibility. Biscuits diameter was negatively correlated with GPC, W and sucrose SRC, and positively correlated with TW, Biscuits spread ratio was negatively correlated with sucrose SRC. Correlation analysis of soft red winter wheat showed that the protein content of flour was positively correlated with WG and ST, and biscuits diameter was negatively correlated with TW and W.

【Conclusion】

Soft red winter wheat had softer grain texture, smaller grain weight and weaker dough strength. The TW, flour extraction rate (FER, %) and WA were stable in different years. Soft red winter wheat fit the requirements of Chinese weak gluten wheat standard better, with higher reaching rate. The Chinese weak gluten wheat standard was too strict on GPC, WG and ST. The correlation among quality indexes of soft white wheat was more significant than soft red winter wheat. The GPC, sucrose SRC and alveograph W were significantly correlated with other quality indexes, which could be used to evaluate the quality of weak gluten wheat. The GPC, WG, sedimentation value and alveograph L of soft wheat were similar, which could be classified into same category.

Total 2