AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Correlation Analysis of Cucumber Fruit Quality Integrating Sensory Evaluation with Nutritional Traits and Flavor Compound Characteristics

LiDong ZHANG1YiCong GUO2HongYu HUANG1Jing NIE2Bing WANG2MengYu LI2JiaWang LI1XiaoLei SUI2( )YuHe LI1( )
State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin 300192
Beijing Key Laboratory of Growth and Developmental Regulation for Protected Vegetable Crops, College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to establish a scientific framework for cucumber fruit quality evaluation by integrating the analysis of nutritional traits and flavor compound profiles across diverse germplasm resources with human sensory evaluation.

Method

Twelve cucumber lines/varieties with significant sensory variation (provided by Tianjin Cucumber Research Institute) were investigated. The measurements included three parts: first, nutritional traits of fruits, such as soluble sugar content (SSC), total soluble solids (TSS), and titratable acidity (TA); second, flavor compound content in fruits, such as total volatiles and key aldehydes [(E, Z)-2, 6-nonadienal, (E)-2-nonenal, (Z)-6-nonenal]; third, sensory evaluation of fruit quality, such as sweetness, juiciness, crispness, aroma, non-astringency, and non-bitterness. An integrated correlation analysis was performed to link sensory attributes with physicochemical profiles.

Result

In the sensory evaluation, non-astringency and sweetness had the highest weighting coefficients (27.12% and 25.49%, respectively), while the other four attributes (aroma, crispness, non-bitterness, and juiciness) ranged from 10.59% to 12.51%. Higher scores across these six dimensions indicated superior overall sensory quality. Furthermore, sweetness, juiciness, crispness, aroma, and non-bitterness of cucumber fruit sensory evaluation were (extremely) correlated with the SSC, TSS content and ascorbic acid content. In addition, cucumber flavor compounds (Z)-6-nonenal content showed significant correlation with sweetness, aroma, juiciness, non-bitterness and non-astringency in sensory evaluation, and it also had extremely significant positive correlation with the SSC, TSS and ascorbic acid content, respectively, while the ratio of cucumber flavor compounds (E, Z)-2, 6-nonadienal to (E)-2-nonenal was significantly correlated with non-astringency. Among the different cucumber varieties tested, line L2 generally exhibited higher levels of fruit SSC, TSS and ascorbic acid content, as well as the ratio of soluble solid content to titratable acid compared with the other lines. It also achieved the highest composite score across all those six sensory attributes. Consequently, line L2 demonstrated superior overall fruit quality.

Conclusion

The SSC, TSS, ascorbic acid content, (Z)-6-nonenal content, and the ratio of (E, Z)-2, 6-nonadienal to (E)-2-nonenal content of cucumber fruits could serve as effective indicators for the rapid evaluation of sensory and flavor quality.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Pages 1087-1100

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHANG L, GUO Y, HUANG H, et al. Correlation Analysis of Cucumber Fruit Quality Integrating Sensory Evaluation with Nutritional Traits and Flavor Compound Characteristics. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1087-1100. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.05.013

500

Views

8

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 21 July 2025
Accepted: 25 December 2025
Published: 01 March 2026
© 2026 The Journal of Scientia Agricultura Sinica