AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (909 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Opinion Paper | Open Access

Expert consensus on the positioning of the “Three-in-One” Registration and Evaluation Evidence System and the value of orientation of the “personal experience”

Qi Wang1,§( )Yong-yan Wang2,§Wei Xiao3,§( )Jin-zhou Tian4Shi-lin Chen5Li-guo Zhu6Guang-rong Sun1Da-ning Zhang7Dai-han Zhou8Guo-qiang Mei9Bao-fan Shen10Qing-guo Wang1Xi-xing Wang11Zheng Nan12Ming-xiang Han13Yue Gao14Xiao-he Xiao15Xiao-bo Sun16Kai-wen Hu17Li-qun Jia18Li Feng19Cheng-yu Wu20Xia Ding1
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China
Jiangsu Kanion Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang 222000, China
Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China
Institute of Herbgenomics, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China
Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China
Tianjin Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300120, China
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430065, China
Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Urumqi 830000, China
Shanxi Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Taiyuan 030012, China
Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130021, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230031, China
Institute of Military Medicine, Academy of Military Sciences, Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Beijing 100850, China
The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100078, China
China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
National Cancer Center, Beijing 100021, China
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China

§These authors contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), as a treasure of the Chinese nation, plays a significant role in maintaining public health. In 2019, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council proposed for the first time the establishment of a TCM registration and evaluation evidence system that integrates TCM theory, personal experience and clinical trials (referred to as the “Three-in-One” System) to promote the inheritance and innovation of TCM. Subsequently, the National Medical Products Administration issued several guiding principles to advance the improvement and implementation of this system. Owing to the complexity of its implementation, there are still differing understandings within the TCM industry regarding the positioning of the “Three-in-One” Registration and Evaluation Evidence System, as well as the connotation and value orientation of the “personal experience.” To address this, Academician Qi Wang, President of the TCM Association, China International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medical and Healthcare and TCM master, led a group of academicians, TCM masters, TCM pharmacology experts and clinical TCM experts to convene a “Seminar on Promoting the Implementation of the ‘Three-in-One’ Registration and Evaluation Evidence System for Chinese Medicinals.” Through extensive discussions, an expert consensus was formed, clarifying the different roles of the TCM theory, “personal experience” and clinical trials within the system. It was further emphasized that the “personal experience” is the core of this system, and its data should be derived from clinical practice scenarios. In the future, the improvement of this system will require collaborative efforts across multiple fields to promote the high-quality development of the Chinese medicinal industry.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine and Technology Assessment
Article number: 9570006

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wang Q, Wang Y-y, Xiao W, et al. Expert consensus on the positioning of the “Three-in-One” Registration and Evaluation Evidence System and the value of orientation of the “personal experience”. Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine and Technology Assessment, 2025, 1(1): 9570006. https://doi.org/10.26599/eCMTA.2025.9570006

2159

Views

150

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 10 March 2025
Revised: 18 March 2025
Accepted: 25 April 2025
Published: 30 April 2025
© 2025 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. Production and hosting by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).