Journal Home > Volume 29 , Issue 3
Tsinghua Science and Technology 2024, 29(3): 671-683 https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2023.9010011
Open Access | Issue | Published: 04 December 2023

Diminishing the Perception Bias in the Working Environment Using a Network Generation-Based Framework

Show Author's Information Jun Qian1,  Tongda Zhang2,  Xiao Sun1( ),  Yueting Chai1
Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China, and with Systems Optimization Laboratory, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
Keywords:
Gini coefficient, income inequality, perception bias, factory production, cooperative network reengineering, homophily-based generative network model
Cite this article:
Qian J, Zhang T, Sun X, et al. Diminishing the Perception Bias in the Working Environment Using a Network Generation-Based Framework. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2024, 29(3): 671-683. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2023.9010011
Download citation
EndNote(RIS)
BibTeX

266

Views

22

Downloads

Citations

0

Crossref

0

WoS

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Abstract Full text About this article

Income inequality is widespread in human society and has important implications for human behavior. People’s perception of the environment bridges income inequality and individual behavioral decisions. Existing research suggests that social income inequality is usually biased, either overestimated or underestimated. However, such phenomena have not been fully explored with quantitive prove, especially in the working environment based on performance data of actual production. In fact, the correct perception of people is the basis of a fair environment for their production decisions. Thus, the perception bias may weaken the adaptability and competitiveness of a company in the market. This paper first confirms the prevalence of individual perception bias of income inequality within the working environment based on actual production data. Our results show that people tend to underestimate income inequity around them, and this underestimation grows with the real unfairness of the working environment. Further, this paper proposes a network generation-based framework with a three-layer structure to correct perception bias using a cooperative network reengineering approach. Within the framework, a homophily-based generative network model is proposed as the key algorithm. Our simulation results show that our proposed framework effectively reduces individuals’ perception bias of income inequality.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Diminishing the Perception Bias in the Working Environment Using a Network Generation-Based Framework

Show Author's information Jun Qian1, Tongda Zhang2, Xiao Sun1( ), Yueting Chai1
Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China, and with Systems Optimization Laboratory, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA

Abstract

Income inequality is widespread in human society and has important implications for human behavior. People’s perception of the environment bridges income inequality and individual behavioral decisions. Existing research suggests that social income inequality is usually biased, either overestimated or underestimated. However, such phenomena have not been fully explored with quantitive prove, especially in the working environment based on performance data of actual production. In fact, the correct perception of people is the basis of a fair environment for their production decisions. Thus, the perception bias may weaken the adaptability and competitiveness of a company in the market. This paper first confirms the prevalence of individual perception bias of income inequality within the working environment based on actual production data. Our results show that people tend to underestimate income inequity around them, and this underestimation grows with the real unfairness of the working environment. Further, this paper proposes a network generation-based framework with a three-layer structure to correct perception bias using a cooperative network reengineering approach. Within the framework, a homophily-based generative network model is proposed as the key algorithm. Our simulation results show that our proposed framework effectively reduces individuals’ perception bias of income inequality.

Keywords: Gini coefficient, income inequality, perception bias, factory production, cooperative network reengineering, homophily-based generative network model

References(75)

[1]

W. M. Thomson, Social inequality in oral health, Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol., vol. 40, no. S2, pp. 28–32, 2012.
DOI Google Scholar
[2]

Y. D. Wei, Spatiality of regional inequality, Appl. Geogr., vol. 61, pp. 1–10, 2015.
DOI Google Scholar
[3]

H. Kleven, C. Landais, and J. E. Søgaard, Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark, Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 181–209, 2019.
DOI Google Scholar
[4]

M. Jackson and B. Holzman, A century of educational inequality in the united states, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 117, no. 32, pp. 19108–19115, 2020.
DOI Google Scholar
[5]

E. Lee, Trade, inequality, and the endogenous sorting of heterogeneous workers, J. Int. Econ., vol. 125, p. 103310, 2020.
DOI Google Scholar
[6]

A. Schäefer, S. Roßteutscher, and S. Abendschön, Rising start-up costs of voting: political inequality among first-time voters, West Eur. Polit., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 819–844, 2020.
DOI Google Scholar
[7]

S. Perveen, M. Akram, A. Nasar, A. Arshad-Ayaz, and A. Naseem, Vaccination-hesitancy and vaccination-inequality as challenges in Pakistan’s COVID-19 response, J. Community Psychol., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 666–683, 2022.
DOI Google Scholar
[8]

I. Kawachi and B. P. Kennedy, Income inequality and health: Pathways and mechanisms, Health Serv. Res., vol. 34, pp. 215–227, 1999.
Google Scholar
[9]

S. Oishi, S. Kesebir, and E. Diener, Income inequality and happiness, Psychol. Sci., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1095–1100, 2011.
DOI Google Scholar
[10]

S. Mishra, L. S. S. Hing, and M. L. Lalumière, Inequality and risk-taking, Evol. Psychol., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2015.
DOI Google Scholar
[11]

A. Nishi and N. A. Christakis, Human behavior under economic inequality shapes inequality, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 112, no. 52, pp. 15781–15782, 2015.
DOI Google Scholar
[12]

M. Coccia, Violent crime driven by income inequality between countries, Turkish Econ. Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33–55, 2018.
Google Scholar
[13]

A. S. Browman, M. Destin, M. S. Kearney, and P. B. Levine, How economic inequality shapes mobility expectations and behaviour in disadvantaged youth, Nat. Hum. Behav., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 214–220, 2019.
DOI Google Scholar
[14]

L. Gangadharan, P. J. Grossman, M. K. Molle, and J. Vecci, Impact of social identity and inequality on antisocial behaviour, Eur. Econ. Rev., vol. 119, pp. 199–215, 2019.
DOI Google Scholar
[15]

J. Li, J. Zhang, D. Zhang, and Q. Ji, Does gender inequality affect household green consumption behaviour in China? Energy Policy, vol. 135, p. 111071, 2019.
DOI Google Scholar
[16]

J. A. Patel, F. B. H. Nielsen, A. A. Badiani, S. Assi, V. A. Unadkat, B. Patel, R. Ravindrane, and H. Wardle, Poverty, inequality and COVID-19: the forgotten vulnerable, Public Health, vol. 183, pp. 110–111, 2020.
DOI Google Scholar
[17]

D. Goya-Tocchetto and B. K. Payne, How economic inequality shapes thought and action, J. Consum. Psychol., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 146–161, 2022.
DOI Google Scholar
[18]

M. Knell and H. Stix, Perceptions of inequality, Eur. J. Polit. Econ., vol. 65, p. 101927, 2020.
DOI Google Scholar
[19]

J. Carrera and P. de la Vega, The impact of income inequality on public debt, J. Econ. Asymmetries, vol. 24, p. e00216, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[20]

Z. Hu, The effect of income inequality on human capital inequality: Evidence from China, Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn., vol. 58, pp. 471–489, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[21]

C. Y. Ma, A. C. Baker, and T. E. Smith, How income inequality influenced personal decisions on disaster preparedness: A multilevel analysis of homeowners insurance among hurricane Maria victims in Puerto Rico, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 53, p. 101953, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[22]

J. N. Meya, M. A. Drupp, and N. Hanley, Testing structural benefit transfer: The role of income inequality, Res. Energy Econ., vol. 64, p. 101217, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[23]

M. Knell and H. Stix, Inequality, perception biases and trust, J. Econ. Inequal., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 801–824, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[24]

B. Gustafsson and L. Shi, Income inequality within and across counties in rural China 1988 and 1995, J. Dev. Econ., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 179–204, 2002.
DOI Google Scholar
[25]

C. Perugini and G. Martino, Income inequality within European regions: Determinants and effects on growth, Rev. Income Wealth, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 373–406, 2008.
DOI Google Scholar
[26]

T. Goda and A. T. García, The rising tide of absolute global income inequality during 1850–2010: Is it driven by inequality within or between countries? Soc. Indic. Res., vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 1051–1072, 2017.
DOI Google Scholar
[27]

J. Heathcote, F. Perri, and G. L. Violante, The rise of US earnings inequality: Does the cycle drive the trend? Rev. Econ. Dyn., vol. 37, no. S1, pp. S181–S204, 2020.
DOI Google Scholar
[28]

A. O. Acheampong, M. Shahbaz, J. Dzator, and Z. Jiao, Effects of income inequality and governance on energy poverty alleviation: Implications for sustainable development policy, Utilities Policy, vol. 78, p. 101403, 2022.
DOI Google Scholar
[29]

K. E. Pickett and R. G. Wilkinson, The ethical and policy implications of research on income inequality and child well-being, Pediatrics, vol. 135, no. S2, pp. S39–S47, 2015.
DOI Google Scholar
[30]

P. Arestis and A. R. Gonzalez-Martinez, Income inequality: Implications and relevant economic policies, Panoeconomicus, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2016.
DOI Google Scholar
[31]

G. Wright, The political implications of American concerns about economic inequality, Polit. Behav., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 321–343, 2018.
DOI Google Scholar
[32]

L. S. Giordono, M. D. Jones, and D. W. Rothwell, Social policy perspectives on economic inequality in wealthy countries, Policy Stud. J., vol. 47, no. S1, pp. S96–S118, 2019.
DOI Google Scholar
[33]

D. Brou, A. Chatterjee, J. Coakley, C. Girardone, and G. Wood, Corporate governance and wealth and income inequality, Corp. Gov. Int. Rev., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 612–629, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[34]

C. C. Corrigan, The effects of increased revenue transparency in the extractives sector: The case of the extractive industries transparency initiative, Extr. Ind. Soc., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 779–787, 2017.
DOI Google Scholar
[35]

S. Choi and Y. Hashimoto, Does transparency pay? Evidence from IMF data transparency policy reforms and emerging market sovereign bond spreads, J. Int. Money Financ., vol. 88, pp. 171–190, 2018.
DOI Google Scholar
[36]

W. Heisler, Increasing pay transparency: A guide for change, Bus. Horiz., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[37]

P. S. Chia, S. H. Law, I. Trinugroho, J. Wiwoho, S. M. Damayanti, and B. S. Sergi, Dynamic linkages among transparency, income inequality and economic growth in developing countries: Evidence from panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) model, Res. Int. Bus. Financ., vol. 60, p. 101599, 2022.
DOI Google Scholar
[38]

X. Yue, S. Li, and X. Gao, How large is income inequality in China: assessment on different estimates of Gini coefficient, China Econ. J., vol. 6, nos. 2&3, pp. 113–122, 2013.
DOI Google Scholar
[39]

R. van der Weide, C. Lakner, and E. Ianchovichina, Is inequality underestimated in Egypt? Evidence from house prices, Rev. Income Wealth, vol. 64, no. S1, pp. S55–S79, 2018.
DOI Google Scholar
[40]

D. Oyserman, H. M. Coon, and M. Kemmelmeier, Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses., Psychol. Bull., vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 3–72, 2002.
DOI Google Scholar
[41]

M. B. Brewer and Y. R. Chen, Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism, Psychol. Rev., vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 133–151, 2007.
DOI Google Scholar
[42]

S. Loughnan, P. Kuppens, J. Allik, K. Balazs, S. De Lemus, K. Dumont, R. Gargurevich, I. Hidegkuti, B. Leidner, L. Matos, et al., Economic inequality is linked to biased self-perception, Psychol. Sci., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1254–1258, 2011.
DOI Google Scholar
[43]
C. P. Nemeth, Human factors Methods for Design : Making Systems Human-Centered. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, 2004.
[44]

J. Schmidtler, V. Knott, C. Hölzel, and K. Bengler, Human centered assistance applications for the working environment of the future, Occup. Ergon., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 83–95, 2015.
DOI Google Scholar
[45]
J. Nelles, S. Kuz, A. Mertens, and C. M. Schlick, Human-centered design of assistance systems for production planning and control: The role of the human in industry 4.0, in Proc. 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. Industrial Technology (ICIT), Taipei, China, 2016, pp. 2099–2104.
DOI
[46]

H. Sakai, New human-centered production system− Building an integrated human management system, WSEAS Trans. Syst., vol. 22, pp. 406–415, 2023.
DOI Google Scholar
[47]

A. K. Sen, From income inequality to economic inequality, Southern Econ. J., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 384–401, 1997.
DOI Google Scholar
[48]

T. Suzuki, Basic income, wealth inequality and welfare: A proposed case in New Zealand, Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 72, p. 118–128, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[49]

Y. Gokan and S. J. Turnovsky, Taylor rules: Consequences for wealth and income inequality, Journal of Macroeconomics, vol. 77, p. 103544, 2023.
DOI Google Scholar
[50]

E. N. Muller, Income inequality, regime repressiveness, and political violence, Am. Sociol. Rev., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 47–61, 1985.
DOI Google Scholar
[51]

I. Kawachi, B. P. Kennedy, K. Lochner, and D. Prothrow-Stith, Social capital, income inequality, and mortality, Am. J. Public Health, vol. 87, no. 9, pp. 1491–1498, 1997.
DOI Google Scholar
[52]

C. Muntaner and J. Lynch, Income inequality, social cohesion, and class relations: A critique of Wilkinson’s neo-Durkheimian research program, Int. J. Health Serv., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 59–81, 1999.
DOI Google Scholar
[53]

J. Beckfield, European integration and income inequality, Am. Sociol. Rev., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 964–985, 2006.
DOI Google Scholar
[54]

R. G. Wilkinson and K. E. Pickett, Income inequality and social dysfunction, Ann. Rev. Sociol., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 493–511, 2009.
DOI Google Scholar
[55]

M. Simpson, Political rights and income inequality: A cross-national test, Am. Sociol. Rev., vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 682–693, 1990.
DOI Google Scholar
[56]

K.-S. Trump, Income inequality influences perceptions of legitimate income differences, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 929–952, 2018.
DOI Google Scholar
[57]

A. Bergh and T. Nilsson, Do liberalization and globalization increase income inequality? Eur. J. Polit. Econ., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 488–505, 2010.
DOI Google Scholar
[58]

M. Brzezinski, M. Myck, and M. Najsztub, Sharing the gains of transition: Evaluating changes in income inequality and redistribution in Poland using combined survey and tax return data, Eur. J. Polit. Econ., vol. 73, p. 102121, 2022.
DOI Google Scholar
[59]

C. Bartels and M. Metzing, An integrated approach for a top-corrected income distribution, J. Econ. Inequal., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 125–143, 2019.
DOI Google Scholar
[60]

F. Loffredo, A. Scala, M. Serra, and M. Quarto, Radon risk mapping: A new geostatistical method based on Lorenz curve and Gini index, J. Environ. Radio., vol. 233, p. 106612, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[61]

T. Sueyoshi, J. J. Qu, A. J. Li, and X. H. Liu, A new approach for evaluating technology inequality and diffusion barriers: The concept of efficiency Gini coefficient and its application in Chinese provinces, Energy, vol. 235, p. 121256, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[62]

Y. Miao, J. Wang, B. Zhang, and H. Li, Practical framework of Gini index in the application of machinery fault feature extraction, Mech. Syst. Signal Proc., vol. 165, p. 108333, 2022.
DOI Google Scholar
[63]

Q. Yin, C. Guo, C. Dong, and T. Wang, May problem-based learning get higher evaluation from student? International Journal of Crowd Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 92–111, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[64]

E. Lee, F. Karimi, C. Wagner, H. H. Jo, M. Strohmaier, and M. Galesic, Homophily and minority-group size explain perception biases in social networks, Nat. Hum. Behav., vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1078–1087, 2019.
DOI Google Scholar
[65]

M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook, Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks, Ann. Rev. Sociol., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 415–444, 2001.
DOI Google Scholar
[66]

P. Nieuwbeerta and H. Flap, Crosscutting social circles and political choice: Effects of personal network composition on voting behavior in the Netherlands, Soc. Networks, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 313–335, 2000.
DOI Google Scholar
[67]

J. Liu and W. Ji, Crowd intelligence evolution based on complex network, International Journal of Crowd Science. vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 281–292, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[68]

Y. Zhang, L. Cui, W. He, X. Lu, and S. Wang, Behavioral data assists decisions: Exploring the mental representation of digital-self, International Journal of Crowd Science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 185–203, 2021.
DOI Google Scholar
[69]

N. A. Christakis and J. H. Fowler, The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network, New Engl. J. Med., vol. 358, no. 21, pp. 2249–2258, 2008.
DOI Google Scholar
[70]

K. Fujimoto and T. W. Valente, Decomposing the components of friendship and friends’ influence on adolescent drinking and smoking, J. Adolescent Health, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 136–143, 2012.
DOI Google Scholar
[71]

G. C. Huang, J. B. Unger, D. Soto, K. Fujimoto, M. A. Pentz, M. Jordan-Marsh, and T. W. Valente, Peer influences: The impact of online and offline friendship networks on adolescent smoking and alcohol use, J. Adolescent Health, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 508–514, 2014.
DOI Google Scholar
[72]

X. Yu, C. Miao, C. Leung, and C. T. Salmon, Role conflict and ambivalence in the aged-parent-adult-child relationship, International Journal of Crowd Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2017.
DOI Google Scholar
[73]

M. Kamada, J. Kitayuguchi, T. Abe, M. Taguri, S. Inoue, Y. Ishikawa, K. Harada, I. M. Lee, A. Bauman, and M. Miyachi, Community-wide promotion of physical activity in middle-aged and older Japanese: A 3-year evaluation of a cluster randomized trial, Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 82, 2015.
DOI Google Scholar
[74]

L. Chen, J. Chen, and C. Xia, Social network behavior and public opinion manipulation, J. Inf. Secur. Appl., vol. 64, p. 103060, 2022.
DOI Google Scholar
[75]

F. Karimi, M. Génois, C. Wagner, P. Singer, and M. Strohmaier, Homophily influences ranking of minorities in social networks, Sci. Rep., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 11077, 2018.
DOI Google Scholar
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 23 November 2022
Revised: 31 January 2023
Accepted: 27 February 2023
Published: 04 December 2023
Issue date: June 2024

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2024.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFF0900800).

Rights and permissions

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return