Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
Fully coupled time-domain simulation is essential for the analysis and design of floating wind turbines (FWTs); however, its high computational cost remains a bottleneck for large-scale parametric and optimization studies. Conventional integrators such as the fourth-order Runge–Kutta (RK4) method require multiple force evaluations per time step; this increases the runtime in aero–hydro–servo–elastic models. To overcome this limitation, a predictor–corrector one-force (PC-1F) time-integration scheme was developed using the in-house simulation tool, Pywind. This scheme enforced a single synchronized force evaluation per time step while preserving second-order accuracy and eliminating empirical damping. PC-1F was verified against RK4 on the IEA 15 MW semisubmersible FWT under wind-only, wave-only, and coupled load cases. Results showed that PC-1F strongly agreed with RK4, exhibiting correlation coefficients above 0.95, mean discrepancies within 0.5% for key response quantities, and consistent power spectral densities in the wave-frequency band (0.05–0.3 Hz). Efficiency tests demonstrated that PC-1F achieved 70%–90% higher iteration rates than RK4, confirming its comparable fidelity at substantially reduced cost. These findings establish PC-1F as a practical, engineering-ready alternative to multistage integration schemes. It can also be employed for accelerated parametric sweep studies and uncertainty quantification and integrated into multiobjective optimization frameworks for next-generation FWT design.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments on this article