AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Road users’ behavior and perceptions of autonomous vehicles with external human–machine interfaces: A review of developments in 2017–2024

Tianpei Tang1,2Xiaofan Xue1Shengnan Zhao1Bang Luo1Hua Wang3( )
School of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The successful deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) relies heavily on their ability to interact safely and effectively with other road users. External human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) have emerged as critical components in facilitating these interactions. Rigorous evaluation and testing of eHMIs are essential for realizing their intended safety and communication benefits. This study provides a comprehensive review of current eHMI research, focusing on their impact on road users’ behavior and perceptions, as well as the methods used for evaluation. Key behavioral factors—such as eHMI modality, information type, location, vehicle kinematics, traffic environment, and user characteristics—are systematically reviewed and summarized. The influence of eHMIs on user perceptions is also explored through indicators such as perceived safety, comprehensibility, trust, cognitive load, and user experience. Despite notable advancements, several critical research gaps remain underexplored. Most studies focus on one-to-one interactions, neglecting the complexities of mixed-traffic environments involving AVs, conventional human-driven vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists. Current evaluation methods largely rely on virtual reality and Wizard-of-Oz experiments, which may fail to fully capture real-world dynamics. Additionally, subjective questionnaires, which are often used in these studies, do not guarantee high reproducibility of findings. Moreover, insufficient attention has been given to the synchronization of eHMI signals with vehicle kinematics. Furthermore, the absence of standardized evaluation frameworks limits cross-study comparability and the development of universally applicable eHMI solutions. To address these challenges, future research should prioritize the integration of naturalistic traffic scenarios, the adoption of objective and reproducible evaluation methods, the exploration of multimodal eHMI designs, and the development of standardized assessment protocols. These efforts are crucial for improving AV communication with diverse road users and ensuring safety in increasingly complex traffic ecosystems.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
Article number: 9210068

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Tang T, Xue X, Zhao S, et al. Road users’ behavior and perceptions of autonomous vehicles with external human–machine interfaces: A review of developments in 2017–2024. Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles, 2025, 8(4): 9210068. https://doi.org/10.26599/JICV.2026.9210068

1918

Views

167

Downloads

2

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

Received: 21 April 2025
Revised: 29 July 2025
Accepted: 23 November 2025
Published: 25 December 2025
© The Author(s) 2025.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).