AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

What patterns contribute to autonomous vehicle crashes? A study of Level 2 and 4 automation via association rule analysis

Hongliang Ding1Sicong Wang2Yang Cao1Xiaowen Fu3Hanlong Fu3Quan Yuan4Tiantian Chen5( )
Institute of Smart City and Intelligent Transportation, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China
State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Green Vehicle and Mobility, School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Cho Chun Shik Graduate School of Mobility, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
Show Author Information

Abstract

With increasing autonomous vehicle (AV) penetration, understanding the factors contributing to AV crashes is crucial for addressing ongoing road safety challenges. This study aims to reveal the effects of vehicle characteristics, road conditions, environmental factors, and precrash movements on the occurrence of head-on, rear-end, and side-impact crashes. In particular, factors associated with various types of Level 2 and Level 4 AV crashes were analyzed. Our data, obtained from the California Department of Motor Vehicles and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, spans from October 2014 to March 2024. Association rule mining techniques identify the significant patterns and interdependencies among the factors contributing to AV crashes. The findings demonstrate that the factors influencing crash types include weather, roadway surface, lighting, and vehicle precrash movements. For example, head-on crashes frequently occur at intersections under poor lighting conditions, whereas rear-end crashes occur more frequently on high-speed highways, particularly because of unexpected braking by the vehicle ahead. Side-impact crashes commonly result from merging maneuvers, especially under adverse weather and lighting conditions. These findings provide new insights into the causal mechanisms behind different types of AV crashes and underscore the need to strengthen traffic management, enhance AV sensing and decision-making capabilities, and implement targeted safety measures in high-risk areas.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
Article number: 9210065

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Ding H, Wang S, Cao Y, et al. What patterns contribute to autonomous vehicle crashes? A study of Level 2 and 4 automation via association rule analysis. Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles, 2025, 8(3): 9210065. https://doi.org/10.26599/JICV.2025.9210065

3445

Views

238

Downloads

3

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

Received: 12 April 2025
Revised: 31 May 2025
Accepted: 19 June 2025
Published: 30 September 2025
© The Author(s) 2025.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).