AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
PDF (13.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

The study of quantitative friction damage models at the interventional catheter–vascular tissue interface

Chengxiong Lin1,2,3 ( )Huilu Yuan3,4,5Chengyong Wang4,5( )
Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Equipment and Control Technology (Ministry of Education), Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
Hubei Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission and Manufacturing Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
Institute of Biological and Medical Engineering, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510316, China
State Key Laboratory of High-Performance Tools, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments and Manufacturing Technology, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Vascular interventional surgery is a minimally invasive treatment. This method involves introducing catheters, guidewires, and other precision instruments into the human body to locally diagnose and treat internal diseases. However, mechanical contact, such as friction, compression, and collision, inevitably occurs during the intervention process. This can cause tissue damage. Currently, mechanical damage to vascular tissues is evaluated primarily in qualitative terms, which limits accurate reflection of both the extent of tissue damage and its influencing factors. This paper specifically studies friction injury between interventional catheters and vascular tissues. This study develops the first quantification model of injury between catheters and blood vessels. The results revealed that increases in the normal force led to increased coefficients of friction (COF) and greater energy dissipation between the friction head and vascular tissue. In contrast, varying speeds produced a trend where the COF and energy dissipation first increased and then decreased. A quantitative evaluation system for vascular tissue injury was established on the basis of indicators such as endothelial cells, glycoproteins, curled tissues, and intimal thickness on the vascular surface. Using this system, damage scores and damage grades were assigned to surface injuries in friction experiments. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation between the COF and injury score. The link between the normal load and sliding velocity was even greater than that between the friction time and injury score. These experimental results lay the foundation for quantitative mechanical damage evaluation. They enable the mapping of relationships between mechanical factors and tissue damage.

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
F1194_ESM.pdf (175.5 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Friction
Article number: 9441194

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Lin C, Yuan H, Wang C. The study of quantitative friction damage models at the interventional catheter–vascular tissue interface. Friction, 2026, 14(8): 9441194. https://doi.org/10.26599/FRICT.2025.9441194

1215

Views

121

Downloads

3

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 23 July 2025
Revised: 15 October 2025
Accepted: 19 November 2025
Published: 02 July 2026
© The Author(s) 2026.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).