AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (845.4 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Research | Open Access

Quality Control Analysis of Normal Breast Imaging using a Remote Ultrasound Robot

Yutong MaaYingying ChenaRenqing JiancanbXiuzhu MaaYun ZhangaXiaochu DangaXuejuan WangaZhanlei ZhangcFaqin Lva( )
Department of Ultrasound, the Third Medical Center, General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Beijing
Naqu Detachment of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Armed Police, Naqu
Health Department of the Support Department of the Xizang Corps of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Armed Police, Lasa
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To explore the quality control value of 5G remote ultrasound robot in normal breast imaging.

Methods

Fifty female volunteers from Xizang were selected to undergo routine breast examinations using 5G remote ultrasound robot (robot group) and on-site ultrasound (control group). Longitudinal and transverse continuous scanning methods were used to collect and save images respectively. The two groups of images were scored for breast imaging quality by five senior attending physicians or above using a blind method according to the Likert scale grading standard. The paired t-test was used to analyze the differences in breast imaging quality scores obtained by five physicians between the two examination methods and the age differences between the two groups of volunteers. The Kappa test was used to analyze the consistency of the image scoring results between the two groups. The χ2 test was used to analyze the ethnic differences between the two groups of volunteers.

Results

There is no significant age difference between the two groups of volunteers (t = −0.850, P = 0.101, P > 0.05). There is no significant difference in the ethnic proportions between the two groups of volunteers (P = 1.00, P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the scores of the five physicians between the two groups of images (P > 0.05), Doctor A (t = −1.647, P = 0.101), Doctor B (t = −0.943, P = 0.347), Doctor C (t = 0.582, P = 0.561), Doctor D (t = 0.040, P = 0.958), Doctor E (t = 0.144, P = 0.886). The consistency of the scoring results of the five doctors on the two groups of images was good (Kappa = 0.789, 0.753, 0.807, 0.778, 0.823, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The remote ultrasound robot has good consistency with the on-site ultrasound imaging quality. The remote ultrasound robot can be used for breast cancer screening in special environments such as high altitude and cold weather.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy
Pages 106-111

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Ma Y, Chen Y, Jiancan R, et al. Quality Control Analysis of Normal Breast Imaging using a Remote Ultrasound Robot. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2026, 10(2): 106-111. https://doi.org/10.26599/AUDT.2026.250069

280

Views

17

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 21 July 2025
Revised: 16 December 2025
Accepted: 04 January 2026
Published: 01 July 2026
2576-2508/© AUDT 2026

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed