Critical tech ethics is my call for action to influencers, leaders, policymakers, and educators to help move our society towards centering race, deliberately and intentionally, to tech ethics. For too long, when “ethics” is applied broadly across different kinds of technology, ethics does not address race explicitly, including how diverse forms of technologies have contributed to violence against and the marginalization of communities of color. Across several years of research, I have studied online behavior to evaluate gender and racial biases. I have concluded that a way to improve technologies, including the Internet, is to create a specific type of ethics termed “critical tech ethics” that connects race to ethics related to technology. This article covers guiding theories for discovering critical tech ethical challenges, contemporary examples for illustrating critical tech ethical challenges, and institutional changes across business, education, and civil society actors for teaching critical tech ethics and encouraging the integration of critical tech ethics with undergraduate computer science. Critical tech ethics has been developed with the imperative to help improve society through connecting race to ethics related to technology, so that we may reduce the propagation of racial injustices currently occurring by educational institutions, technology corporations, and civil actors. My aim is to improve racial equity through the development of critical tech ethics as research, teaching, and practice in social norms, higher education, policy making, and civil society.
J. U. Korn, Black nerds, asian activists, and caucasian dogs: Online race-based cultural group identities within Facebook groups, International Journal of Interactive Communication Systems and Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14–25, 2015.
J. U. Korn, Expecting penises in chatroulette: Race, gender, and sexuality in anonymous online spaces, Popular Communication, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 95–109, 2017.
J. U. Korn, #IfTheyGunnedMeDown: How ethics, gender, and race intersect when researching race and racism on Tumblr, Journal of Digital Social Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–44, 2019.
A. Denis, Intersectional analysis: A contribution of feminism to sociology, International Sociology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 677–694, 2008.
K. Crenshaw, Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color, Stanford Law Review, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1241–1299, 1991.
D. Jones, The representation of female athletes in online images of successive Olympic Games, Pacific Journalism Review, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 108–129, 2006.
D. W. Chambers, Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test, Science Education, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 255–265, 1983.
D. Polan, Professors, Discourse, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 28–49, 1993.
L. S. Lewis, Students’ images of professors, The Educational Forum, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 185–190, 1968.
D. D. McFarland, Self-images of law professors: Rethinking the schism in legal education, Journal of Legal Education, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 232–260, 1985.
C. Fisanick, “They are weighted with authority”: Fat female professors in academic and popular cultures, Feminist Teacher, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 237–255, 2007.
M. Dagaz and B. Harger, Race, gender, and research: Implications for teaching from depictions of professors in popular film, 1985–2005, Teaching Sociology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 274–289, 2011.
N. Gotanda, A critique of ‘our constitution is color-blind’, Stanford Law Review, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–68, 1991.
D. G. Solorzano, Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicago scholars, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 121–136, 1998.
T. Ebede and A. Papier, Disparities in dermatology educational resources, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 687–690, 2006.
K. Kirkpatrick, Battling algorithmic bias: How do we ensure algorithms treat us fairly? Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 16–17, 2016.
The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).