Journal Home > Volume 2 , Issue 4

Spiritual caretakers have been present in every culture throughout human history. We know them as ministers, rabbis, lamas, shamans, imams, chaplains, gurus, and wise elders. In modern, secular times, they also include therapists, social workers, meditation teachers, and more. These caretakers support us through birth, death, and many of the most intimate and complex parts of the human experience. They use skills honed over many years that require paying radical attention to the humanity of others. Yet where is this expertise to be found in the creation of the digital technologies that have become portals through which we live, love, learn, grieve, and connect with our communities? Those who design and build digital technology must accept that we have become de-facto spiritual caretakers with the power to treat the well-being of humanity with care or with negligence. Unfortunately, caretaking is a role that computer science degrees do not prepare people for, few business models optimize for, and algorithms can not easily solve. This article outlines two concrete best practices that can help foster genuine responsibility and care on the part of technologists and technology companies. First, technologists must recognize that what we create is an expression of our own inner state. Our spiritual and emotional health is inextricably linked with our ability to build technology with responsibility and wisdom. Second, technologists must create an empowered seat at the table for those with the expertise and orientation needed to care for our souls, whether from a religious or secular lens.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Creating Technology Worthy of the Human Spirit

Show Author's information Aden Van Noppen1( )
Mobius, San Geronimo, CA 94963, USA

Abstract

Spiritual caretakers have been present in every culture throughout human history. We know them as ministers, rabbis, lamas, shamans, imams, chaplains, gurus, and wise elders. In modern, secular times, they also include therapists, social workers, meditation teachers, and more. These caretakers support us through birth, death, and many of the most intimate and complex parts of the human experience. They use skills honed over many years that require paying radical attention to the humanity of others. Yet where is this expertise to be found in the creation of the digital technologies that have become portals through which we live, love, learn, grieve, and connect with our communities? Those who design and build digital technology must accept that we have become de-facto spiritual caretakers with the power to treat the well-being of humanity with care or with negligence. Unfortunately, caretaking is a role that computer science degrees do not prepare people for, few business models optimize for, and algorithms can not easily solve. This article outlines two concrete best practices that can help foster genuine responsibility and care on the part of technologists and technology companies. First, technologists must recognize that what we create is an expression of our own inner state. Our spiritual and emotional health is inextricably linked with our ability to build technology with responsibility and wisdom. Second, technologists must create an empowered seat at the table for those with the expertise and orientation needed to care for our souls, whether from a religious or secular lens.

Keywords: ethics, spirituality, well-being, humane technology

References(42)

1
L. Stevens, Alexa, can you prevent suicide? https://www.wsj.com/articles/alexa-can-you-prevent-suicide-1508762311, 2017.
2
St. Gregory the Great, Pastoral Care. New York, NY, USA: Newman, 1978.
3

L. Burton and L. VandeCreek, Professional chaplaincy: Its role and importance in healthcare, Journal of Pastoral Care, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 81–97, 2001.

4
J. Vincent, Former Facebook exec says social media is ripping apart society, https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/11/16761016/former-facebook-exec-ripping-apart-society, 2017.
5
S. Frenkel, N. Confessore, C. Kang, M. Rosenberg, and J. Nicas, Delay, deny and deflect: How Facebook’s leaders fought through crisis, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/14/technology/facebook-data-russia-election-racism.html, 2018.
6
S. Levin, YouTube alters search algorithm over fake Las Vegas conspiracy videos, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/06/youtube-alters-search-algorithm-over-fake-las-vegas-conspiracy-videos, 2017.
7
C. O. Scharmer, The blind spot of leadership, https://zampellagroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/2003_TheBlindSpot.pdf, 2003.
8
9
C. Trungpa, The Myth of Freedom and the Way of Meditation. Boston, MA, USA: Shambhala, 2002.
10
K. Schwab, The fourth industrial revolution, https://www.weforum.org/about/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-by-klaus-schwab, 2020.
11
P. Mozur, A genocide incited on facebook, with posts from Myanmar’s military, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/15/technology/myanmar-facebook-genocide.html, 2018.
12
Media, The Nielsen total audience report: Q1 2018, https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/report/2018/q1-2018-total-audience-report/, 2018.
13
R. Raphael, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings: Sleep is our competition, https://www.fastcompany.com/40491939/netflix-ceo-reed-hastings-sleep-is-our-competition, 2017.
14
S. Turkle, Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York, NY, USA: Penguin Press, 2015.
15
T. Lorenz, Teens explain the World of Snapchat’s addictive streaks, where friendships live or die, http://www.businessinsider.com/teens-explain-snapchat-streaks-why-theyre-so-addictive-and-important-to-friendships-2017-4, 2017.
16
S. Aslam, Snapchat by the numbers: Stats, demographics & fun facts, https://www.omnicoreagency.com/snapchat-statistics/, 2021.
17
18
H. Andersson, Social media apps are ‘Deliberately’ addictive to users, https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44640959, 2018.
19
S. Murphy, Facebook changes its ‘move fast and break things’ motto, https://mashable.com/2014/04/30/facebooks-new-mantra-move-fast-with-stability/, 2014.
20
E. Pariser, The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web is Changing What We Read and How We Think. New York, NY, USA: Penguin Books, 2012.
21
J. Kornfield, The Wise Heart. New York, NY, USA: Random House, 2009.
22
T. Shlain, Tech’s best feature: The off Switch, https://hbr.org/2013/03/techs-best-feature-the-off-swi, 2013.
23
M. L. Gray, Out in the Country. New York, NY, USA: NYU Press, 2009.
24
S. Sandberg, Making it easier to honor a loved one on Facebook after they pass away, https://about.fb.com/news/2019/04/updates-to-memorialization/, 2019.
25
M. Anderson, M. Barthel, A. Perrin, and E. Vogels, #BlackLivesMatter surges on Twitter after George Floyd’s death, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/06/10/blacklivesmatter-surges-on-twitter-after-george-floyds-death, 2020.
26
M. Anderson, S. Toor, L. Rainie, and A. Smith, An analysis of #BlackLivesMatter and other Twitter hashtags related to political or social issues, https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/07/11/an-analysis-of-blacklivesmatter-and-other-twitter-hashtags-related-to-political-or-social-issues/, 2018.
27
J. Dorsey, We’ve made the decision to stop all political advertising on Twitter Globally. We believe political message reach should be earned, not bought. Why? A few reasons, https://twitter.com/jack/status/1189634360472829952?ref_src=twsrc.tfw|twcamp.tweetembed&ref_url=https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/30/twitter-bans-political-ads-after-facebook-refused-to-do-so.html, 2019.
28
K. Stankiewicz, Twitter executive on political ad ban: ‘We want to make sure we don’t create filter bubbles’, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/07/twitters-matt-derella-on-political-ad-ban-and-filter-bubbles.html, 2020.
29
T. Benson, New business fad: Tripping on ayahuasca, https://www.thedailybeast.com/new-business-fad-tripping-on-ayahuasca, 2017.
30
V. Giang, Inside Google’s insanely popular emotional-intelligence course, https://www.fastcompany.com/3044157/inside-googles-insanely-popular-emotional-intelligence-course, 2015.
31
A. Groth, Silicon Valley is hacking spiritual practices to boost productivity, https://qz.com/728887/silicon-valley-is-hacking-spiritual-practices-to-boost-productivity, 2016.
32
T. Fossella, Human nature, buddha nature: An interview with John Welwood, https://tricycle.org/magazine/human-nature-buddha-nature/, 2011.
33
U. S. Army Chaplain Corps, https://armyhistory.org/u-s-army-chaplain-corps/, 2015.
34
L. Shane III and P. Kime, New VA study finds 20 veterans commit suicide each day, https://www.militarytimes.com/veterans/2016/07/07/new-va-study-finds-20-veterans-commit-suicide-each-day/, 2016.
35
A. W. Schaef, When Society Becomes an Addict. San Francisco, CA, USA: Harper & Row, 1987.
36
D. Evon, Did Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, and other tech billionaire parents advocate limiting children’s technology use, http://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tech-billionaire-parents-limit, 2018.
37
A. Thomson, Help kids to kick social media addiction, https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/help-kids-to-kick-social-media-addiction-x7xjqh9rf, 2018.
38
P. Chödrön, When Things Fall Apart: Heartfelt Advice for Hard Times. Shaftesbury, UK: Element, 2005.
39
P. J. Palmer, Life on the Mobius strip, https://onbeing.org/blog/life-on-the-mobius-strip/, 2016.
40
D. Pereda, However Long the Night. Santa Rosa, CA, USA: Eternal Press, 2012.
41
T. N. Hanh, What is Sangha? https://www.lionsroar.com/the-practice-of-sangha/, 2019.
42
D. Boyd, J. Metcalf, and E. Moss, Owning ethics: Corporate logics, Silicon Valley, and the institutionalization of ethics, https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Owning-Ethics-PDF-version-2.pdf, 2019.https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2019.0022
DOI
Publication history
Copyright
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 20 May 2021
Revised: 23 November 2021
Accepted: 25 November 2021
Published: 30 January 2022
Issue date: December 2021

Copyright

© The author(s) 2021

Rights and permissions

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return