788
Views
58
Downloads
3
Crossref
N/A
WoS
3
Scopus
N/A
CSCD
Societies of the late prehispanic Andes—the Inkas principal among them—have long figured as “exceptions to the rule” in social evolutionary schemata, in large measure because they seemingly lacked key technological hallmarks of complex societies found in other world regions, despite their observed large scale and complex, hierarchical political and economic formations. Such presumed absences are encoded in the Seshat Global History Databank, a large global comparative diachronic database recording many dimensions of human societies. Analyses derived from the current version of the Seshat database necessarily reproduce these supposed absences, as they inhere in its data ontology, structure, and registry. Nonetheless, patterns observed in the dataset provide a means for identifying processes acting on and through Andean peoples and the complex political formations they elaborated. Specifically, this paper evaluates a proposed information processing threshold model of social evolution, which suggests that social dynamics are driven first by processes related to social scale, and then by a phase of dynamics in which further scalar increases are only possible through innovations in information processing. The Andean region appears to violate this model because the Seshat database records writing and other information processing technologies as absent in the case of the Inka empire. The author argues that the dynamics of the Andean region are actually consistent with the information threshold model, but the data as constituted do not capture the relevant variables. The Inkas elaborated sophisticated information processing on par with counterparts in other world regions, but through radically distinct forms and pathways, including the Andean khipu (knotted string registries), decimal administration, and a colossal logistical and administrative infrastructural apparatus. This interwoven bundle of technologies and institutions constituted an information revolution that surpassed the information threshold and enabled explosive Inka imperial expansion, even as it produced certain vulnerabilities and fragile sovereignty.
Societies of the late prehispanic Andes—the Inkas principal among them—have long figured as “exceptions to the rule” in social evolutionary schemata, in large measure because they seemingly lacked key technological hallmarks of complex societies found in other world regions, despite their observed large scale and complex, hierarchical political and economic formations. Such presumed absences are encoded in the Seshat Global History Databank, a large global comparative diachronic database recording many dimensions of human societies. Analyses derived from the current version of the Seshat database necessarily reproduce these supposed absences, as they inhere in its data ontology, structure, and registry. Nonetheless, patterns observed in the dataset provide a means for identifying processes acting on and through Andean peoples and the complex political formations they elaborated. Specifically, this paper evaluates a proposed information processing threshold model of social evolution, which suggests that social dynamics are driven first by processes related to social scale, and then by a phase of dynamics in which further scalar increases are only possible through innovations in information processing. The Andean region appears to violate this model because the Seshat database records writing and other information processing technologies as absent in the case of the Inka empire. The author argues that the dynamics of the Andean region are actually consistent with the information threshold model, but the data as constituted do not capture the relevant variables. The Inkas elaborated sophisticated information processing on par with counterparts in other world regions, but through radically distinct forms and pathways, including the Andean khipu (knotted string registries), decimal administration, and a colossal logistical and administrative infrastructural apparatus. This interwoven bundle of technologies and institutions constituted an information revolution that surpassed the information threshold and enabled explosive Inka imperial expansion, even as it produced certain vulnerabilities and fragile sovereignty.
P. Turchin, R. Brennan, T. Currie, K. Feeney, P. Francois, D. Hoyer, J. Manning, A. Marciniak, D. Mullins, A. Palmisano, et al., Seshat: The global history databank, Cliodynamics:J. Quant. Hist. Cult. Evol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 77–107, 2015.
P. Turchin, T. E. Currie, H. Whitehouse, P. François, K. Feeney, D. Mullins, D. Hoyer, C. Collins, S. Grohmann, P. Savage, et al., Quantitative historical analysis uncovers a single dimension of complexity that structures global variation in human social organization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. E144–E151, 2018.
J. Shin, M. H. Price, D. H. Wolpert, H. Shimao, B. Tracey, and T. A. Kohler, Scale and information-processing thresholds in Holocene social evolution, Nat. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2394, 2020.
P. Turchin, D. Hoyer, J. Bennett, K. Basava, E. Cioni, K. Feeney, P. Francois, S. Holder, J. Levine, S. Nugent, et al., The Equinox2020 Seshat data release, Cliodynamics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2020.
B. S. Bauer and R. A. Covey, Processes of state formation in the Inca heartland (Cuzco, Peru), Am. Anthropol., vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 846–864, 2002.
J. H. Rowe, Absolute chronology in the Andean area, Am. Antiq., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 265–284, 1945.
R. A. Covey, A processual study of Inka state formation, J. Anthropol. Archaeol., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 333–357, 2003.
S. Kosiba and A. M. Bauer, Mapping the political landscape: Toward a GIS analysis of environmental and social difference, J. Archaeol. Method Theory, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 61–101, 2013.
K. E. Quave, R. A. Covey, and K. X. D. Cáceres, Archaeological investigations at yunkaray (Cuzco, Peru): Reconstructing the rise and fall of an early Inca rival (A. D. 1050–1450), J. Field Archaeol., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 332–343, 2018.
K. E. Quave, S. A. Kennedy, and R. A. Covey, Rural Cuzco before and after Inka imperial conquest: Foodways, status, and identity (Maras, Peru), Int. J. Histor. Archaeol., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 868–892, 2019.
S. Alconini, The southeastern Inka frontier against the Chiriguanos: structure and dynamics of the Inka imperial borderlands, Latin Am. Antiq., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 389–418, 2004.
E. Arkush, War, chronology, and causality in the Titicaca Basin, Latin Am. Antiq., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 339–373, 2008.
T. N. D’Altroy, Transitions in power: Centralization of Wanka political organization under Inka rule, Ethnohistory, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 78–102, 1987.
S. A. Wernke, The politics of community and Inka statecraft in the Colca Valley, Peru, Latin Am. Antiq., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 177–208, 2006.
K. J. Schreiber, Conquest and consolidation: A comparison of the Wari and Inka occupations of a highland Peruvian Valley, Am. Antiq., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 266–284, 1987.
C. J. Julien, How Inca decimal administration worked, Ethnohistory, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 257–279, 1988.
I. Silverblatt, Imperial dilemmas, the politics of kinship, and Inca reconstructions of history, Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 83–102, 1988.
J. Murra, La mit’a al Tawantinsuyu: Prestaciones de los grupos étnicos, Chungara, vol. 10, pp. 77–94, 1983.
D. Souleles, Knotty financiers: A comparative take on finance, value, and inequality, J. Anthropol. Archaeol., vol. 59, p. 101205, 2020.
T. LeVine, Inka labor service at the regional level: The functional reality, Ethnohistory, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 14–46, 1987.
M. van Buren, Rethinking the vertical archipelago: Ethnicity, exchange, and history in the south central Andes, Am. Anthropol., vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 338–351, 1996.
T. N. D’Altroy, T. K. Earle, D. L. Browman, D. La Lone, M. E. Moseley, J. V. Murra, T. P. Myers, F. Salomon, K. J. Schreiber, and J. R. Topic, Staple finance, wealth finance, and storage in the Inka political economy [and comments and reply], Curr. Anthropol., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 187–206, 1985.
D. Jenkins, A network analysis of Inka roads, administrative centers, and storage facilities, Ethnohistory, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 655–687, 2001.
C. L. Costin and T. K. Earle, Status distinction and legitimation of power as reflected in changing patterns of consumption in late prehispanic Peru, Am. Antiq., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 691–714, 1989.
T. D. Dillehay, El colonialismo inka, el consumo de chicha y los festines desde una perspectiva de banquetes políticos, Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, vol. 7, pp. 355–363, 2003.
C. H. Garavito, Producing legibility through ritual: The Inka expansion in Huarochirí (Lima, Peru), J. Soc. Archaeol., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 292–312, 2020.
E. A. Jolie, T. F. Lynch, P. R. Geib, and J. M. Adovasio, Cordage, textiles, and the late Pleistocene peopling of the Andes, Curr. Anthropol., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 285–296, 2011.
J. C. Splitstoser, T. D. Dillehay, J. Wouters, and A. Claro, Early pre-Hispanic use of indigo blue in Peru, Sci. Adv., vol. 2, no. 9, p. e1501623, 2016.
W. J. Conklin, Structure as meaning in Andean textiles, Chungara, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 109–131, 1997.
S. Hyland, G. A. Ware, and M. Clark, Knot direction in a khipu/alphabetic text from the central Andes, Latin Am. Antiq., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 189–197, 2014.
S. Hyland, How khipus indicated labour contributions in an Andean village: An explanation of colour banding, seriation and ethnocategories, J. Mater. Cult., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 490–509, 2016.
J. Ochsendorf, Sustainable structural design: Lessons from history, Struct. Eng. Int., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 192–194, 2004.
G. Urton, From middle horizon cord-keeping to the rise of Inka khipus in the central Andes, Antiquity, vol. 88, no. 339, pp. 205–221, 2014.
L. L. Locke, The ancient Quipu, a Peruvian knot record, Am. Anthropol., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 325–332, 1912.
G. Urton and A. Chu, Accounting in the King’s storehouse: The Inkawasi Khipu archive, Latin Am. Antiq., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 512–529, 2015.
G. Urton, Sin, confession, and the arts of book- and cord-keeping: An intercontinental and transcultural exploration of accounting and governmentality, Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 801–831, 2009.
G. Urton and C. J. Brezine, Khipu accounting in ancient Peru, Science, vol. 309, no. 5737, pp. 1065–1067, 2005.
M. Medrano and G. Urton, Toward the decipherment of a set of mid-colonial Khipus from the Santa Valley, coastal Peru, Ethnohistory, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2018.
F. Salomon, How an Andean “writing without words” works, Curr. Anthropol., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2001.
G. Brokaw, The poetics of Khipu historiography: Felipe Guaman Poma de Ayala’s Nueva corónica and the Relación de los quipucamayos, Latin Am. Res. Rev., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 111–147, 2003.
M. Medrano, Testimony from knotted strings: An archival reconstruction of early colonial Andean khipu readings, Hist. Anthropol., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 289–311, 2021.
M. Medrano, Khipu transcription typologies: A corpus-based study of the Textos Andinos, Ethnohistory, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 311–341, 2021.
S. Hyland, Writing with twisted cords: The inscriptive capacity of Andean Khipus, Curr. Anthropol., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 412–419, 2017.
B. Vining and P. R. Williams, Crossing the western Altiplano: The ecological context of Tiwanaku migrations, J. Archaeol. Sci., vol. 113, p. 105046, 2020.
J. Grant and K. Lane, The political ecology of late South American pastoralism: An Andean perspective A. D. 1,000−1,615, J. Pol. Ecol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 446–469, 2018.
A. E. Nielsen, J. Berenguer, and G. Pimentel, Inter-nodal archaeology, mobility, and circulation in the Andes of Capricorn during the Late Intermediate Period (AD 1000–1450), Quat. Int., vol. 533, pp. 48–65, 2019.
N. Tripcevich and A. Mackay, Procurement at the Chivay obsidian source, Arequipa, Peru, World Archaeol., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 271–297, 2011.
S. Wernke, P. VanValkenburgh, and A. Saito, Interregional archaeology in the age of big data: Building online collaborative platforms for virtual survey in the Andes, J. Field Archaeol., vol. 45, no. S1, pp. S61–S74, 2020.
This paper was written with the support of a faculty fellowship from the Vanderbilt University Robert Penn Warren Center for the Humanities. I am most grateful to Tim Kohler and David Wolpert, organizers of the Santa Fe Institute Virtual Working Group “Evolution of collective computational abilities of (pre)historic societies” for their gracious invitation to participate in a stimulating series of discussions. Special thanks are due to Darcy Bird for coordinating a smoothly run virtual meeting. Gabriela Oré Menéndez assisted in compiling and digitizing the Inka road system in the map figure in this article. I thank the anonymous reviewers of the draft manuscript, who provided constructive feedback and additional references. Though my thinking benefitted tremendously from my interactions with the Santa Fe working group, any errors and shortcomings in this paper are solely my own.
The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).