Journal Home > Volume 2 , Issue 1

Are Americans weaving their political views more tightly into the fabric of their self-identity over time? If so, then we might expect partisan disagreements to continue becoming more emotional, tribal, and intractable. Much recent scholarship has speculated that this politicization of Americans’ identity is occurring, but there has been little compelling attempt to quantify the phenomenon, largely because the concept of identity is notoriously difficult to measure. We introduce here a methodology, Longitudinal Online Profile Sampling (LOPS), which affords quantifiable insights into the way individuals amend their identity over time. Using this method, we analyze millions of "bios" on the microblogging site Twitter over a 4-year span, and conclude that the average American user is increasingly integrating politics into their social identity. Americans on the site are adding political words to their bios at a higher rate than any other category of words we measured, and are now more likely to describe themselves by their political affiliation than their religious affiliation. The data suggest that this is due to both cohort and individual-level effects.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Using Twitter Bios to Measure Changes in Self-Identity: Are Americans Defining Themselves More Politically Over Time?

Show Author's information Nick Rogers( )Jason J. Jones
Department of Sociology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA

Abstract

Are Americans weaving their political views more tightly into the fabric of their self-identity over time? If so, then we might expect partisan disagreements to continue becoming more emotional, tribal, and intractable. Much recent scholarship has speculated that this politicization of Americans’ identity is occurring, but there has been little compelling attempt to quantify the phenomenon, largely because the concept of identity is notoriously difficult to measure. We introduce here a methodology, Longitudinal Online Profile Sampling (LOPS), which affords quantifiable insights into the way individuals amend their identity over time. Using this method, we analyze millions of "bios" on the microblogging site Twitter over a 4-year span, and conclude that the average American user is increasingly integrating politics into their social identity. Americans on the site are adding political words to their bios at a higher rate than any other category of words we measured, and are now more likely to describe themselves by their political affiliation than their religious affiliation. The data suggest that this is due to both cohort and individual-level effects.

Keywords: social media, Twitter, identity, social identity theory, ideology, political polarization

References(44)

[1]
[2]
C. Heldman, Protest Politics in the Marketplace: Consumer Activism in the Corporate Age. New York, NY, USA: Cornell University Press, 2017.
DOI
[3]
L. Mason, Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago, IL, USA: The University of Chicago Press, 2018.
DOI
[4]
Pew Research Center, Party identification trends 1992-2017, https://www.people-press.org/2018/03/20/party-identification-trends-1992-2017/, 2018.
[5]
Gallup, Party affiliation: Historical trends, https://news.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx, 2021.
[6]
B. Bishop, The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart. Boston, MA, USA: Mariner Books, 2008.
[7]
N. Rogers, Split screens: A content analysis of american liberals’ and conservatives’ respective television favorites, Psychol. Pop. Med., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 45-58, 2020.
[8]
D. DellaPosta, Y. R. Shi, and M. Macy, Why do liberals drink lattes? Am. J. Sociol., vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 1473-1511, 2015.
[9]
P. DiMaggio, Are art-museum visitors different from other people? The relationship between attendance and social and political attitudes in the United States, Poetics, vol. 24, nos. 2-4, pp. 161-180, 1996.
[10]
A. I. Abramowitz and S. Webster, The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century, Elect. Stud., vol. 41, pp. 12-22, 2016.
[11]
S. Iyengar and S. J. Westwood, Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization, Am. J. Pol. Sci., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 690-707, 2015.
[12]
Pew Research Center, Partisanship and political animosity in 2016, http://www.people-press.org/2016/06/22/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016/, 2016.
[13]
J. Greenebaum, Veganism, identity and the quest for authenticity, Food Cult. Soc., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 129-144, 2012.
[14]
A. D. Cast, Identities and behavior, in Advances in Identity Theory and Research, P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, and P. A. Thoits, eds. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 2003.
[15]
P. J. Burke and D. C. Reitzes, The link between identity and role performance, Soc. Psychol. Q., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 83-92, 1981.
[16]
J. J. Van Bavel and A. Pereira, The partisan Brain: An identity-based model of political belief, Trends Cogn. Sci., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 213-224, 2018.
[17]
L. Huddy, From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory, Polit. Psychol., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 127-156, 2001.
[18]
E. Goffman, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY, USA: Penguin Random House, 1959.
[19]
G. P. Stone, Appearance and the self: A slightly revised version, in Social Psychology Through Symbolic Interaction, G. P. Stone and H. A. Farberman, eds. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 1981.
[20]
H. Tajfel and J. Turner, An integrative theory of intergroup conflict, in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, W. G. Austin and S. Worchel, eds. Monterey, CA, USA: Brooks/Cole, 1979.
[21]
G. L. Cohen, Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 808-822, 2003.
[22]
S. Stryker and R. T. Serpe, Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts? Soc. Psychol. Q., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 16-35, 1994.
[23]
P. J. Egan, Identity as dependent variable: How americans shift their identities to align with their politics, Am. J. Pol. Sci., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 699-716, 2019.
[24]
L. D. Davenport, The role of gender, class, and religion in biracial Americans’ racial labeling decisions, Am. Sociol. Rev., vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 57-84, 2016.
[25]
L. Cosmides, J. Tooby, and R. Kurzban, Perceptions of race, Trends Cogn. Sci., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 173-179, 2003.
[26]
D. Roberts, Donald trump and the rise of tribal epistemology, https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/22/14762030/donald-trump-tribal-epistemology, 2017.
[27]
A. Sullivan, Cam America survive tribalism? New York Magazine, http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/09/can-democracy-survive-tribalism.html, 2017.
[28]
A. Chua, The destructive dynamics of political tribalism, The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/20/opinion/destructive-political-tribalism.html/, 2018.
[29]
M. Sherif, O. J. Harvey, B. J. White, W. R. Hood, and C. W. Sherif, Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman, OK, USA: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange, 1961.
[30]
C. R. Sunstein, The law of group polarization, J. Polit. Philos., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 175-195, 2002.
[31]
D. G. Myers and H. Lamm, The group polarization phenomenon, Psychol. Bull., vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 602-627, 1976.
[32]
B. Nyhan and J. Reifler, When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions, Polit. Behav., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 303-330, 2010.
[33]
M. Rocque, C. Posick, and R. Paternoster, Identities through time: an exploration of identity change as a cause of desistance, Justice. Q., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 45-72, 2016.
[34]
M. H. Kuhn and T. S. McPartland, An empirical investigation of self-attitudes, Am. Sociol. Rev., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 68-76, 1954.
[35]
C. B. Hawkins and B. A. Nosek, Motivated independence? Implicit party identity predicts political judgments among self-proclaimed independents. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1437-1452, 2012.
[36]
B. E. Keith, The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press, 1992.
[37]
M. Sherif, Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict, Am. J. Sociol., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 349-356, 1958.
[38]
M. S. Levendusky, Americans, not partisans: Can priming american national identity reduce affective polarization? J. Polit., vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 59-70, 2018.
[39]
R. Mueller, Report on the Investigation Into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election. U.S. Department of Justice, 2019.
[40]
Pew Research Center, Sizing up twitter users, https://www.benton.org/headlines/sizing-twitter-users, 2019.
[41]
Twitter, Form 10-Q, filed with the U.S. securities and exchange commission, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418091/000156459014003474/twtr-10q_20140630.htm, 2014.
[42]
O. Varol, E. Ferrara, C. A. Davis, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini, Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization, in Proc. 11th Int. AAAI Conf. on Web and Social Media, Montreal, Canada, 2017.
[43]
Twitter, Enabling further research of information operations on twitter, https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2018/enabling-further-research-of-information-operations-on-twitter.html, 2018.
[44]
Twitter, Information Operations on Twitter: Principles, Process, and Disclosure, https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2019/information-ops-on-twitter.html, 2019.
Publication history
Copyright
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 21 November 2020
Accepted: 17 January 2021
Published: 16 February 2021
Issue date: March 2021

Copyright

© The author(s) 2021

Rights and permissions

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return