AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Analysis of the seepage mechanism of brine-CO2 oil displacement and storage in heterogeneous porous media with carbonate coating

Xiaopu WANG1,2Kefan MA1,2Qingxuan WANG1,2Liming ZHANG1,2Kai ZHANG2,3Omar ALFARISI2,4Zhaomin LI5Binfei LI1,2( )
State Key Laboratory of Deep Oil and Gas, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
School of Information and Control Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266580, China
Dragon Oil Co. Ltd., Emirates National Oil Company, Dubai 009714, United Arab Emirates
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

Carbonate reservoirs have become strategic targets for reserve expansion in China and the Middle East, driven by the dual goals of reducing carbon emissions and ensuring energy security. However, their significant heterogeneity, complex pore structures, and wettability changes present considerable challenges to the efficiency of CO2-based enhanced oil recovery (EOR). At the pore level, the interaction of capillary forces, viscous forces, and the evolution of multiphase interfaces causes unstable displacement fronts and severely limits sweep efficiency in low-permeability areas.

Methods

To tackle these issues, this study aims to reveal the pore-scale multiphase seepage mechanisms of brine–CO2 displacement in carbonate-coated heterogeneous porous media. This provides a microscopic foundation for optimizing CO2 flooding parameters and enhancing sweep performance in actual carbonate reservoirs. A heterogeneous pore network was constructed using a microfluidic chip, and calcium carbonate was coated in situ to simulate authentic carbonate reservoir surfaces and wettability. A series of visualization experiments were conducted at a controlled temperature (40 ℃). CO2 foam flooding and brine flooding at different injection rates were compared. A CCD imaging system was used to capture pore-scale evolution of oil, water, and gas phases, and gas saturation and residual oil distributions were quantified through image processing. To improve the accuracy of residual oil characterization, the ResNet152 deep neural network was trained on 2885 labeled microfluidic sub-images from CO2 flooding, CO2–water alternating flooding, and brine flooding. Using weighted cross-entropy loss, AdamW optimization, and learning rate scheduling, the model achieved high classification accuracy for dispersed, mixed, and heterogeneous residual oil.

Results

Results showed that flooding performance was strongly affected by injection rate and pore-structure heterogeneity. At moderate flow rates (0.5–3 μL·min–1), CO2 foam greatly improved sweep efficiency, nearly eliminating residual oil saturation. Foam viscosity and the Jamin effect effectively suppressed viscous fingering and prevented preferential flow through high-permeability channels, forcing the displacing phase into low-permeability areas. Conversely, at very low injection rates (0.1 μL·min–1), foam instability caused large dispersed gas bubbles, limiting gas saturation to 25%, and hindered oil droplet mobilization, resulting in a high residual oil saturation of 42%. Gas saturation displayed a parabolic relationship with flow rate, with the maximum (93%) at 1 μL·min–1, where bubble size was smallest, and foam stability was optimal. Deep-learning-based oil classification also showed that brine flooding and CO2–water alternating flooding primarily produced dispersed residual oil, whereas surfactant-assisted CO2 flooding created a mixture of dispersed (49%), mixed (36%), and heterogeneous (14%) oil, reflecting foam instability and uneven sweep in highly heterogeneous zones. The model achieved a validation accuracy of 93%, confirming its effectiveness in pore-scale residual oil identification.

Conclusions

This study clarifies the mechanisms underlying brine–CO2 displacement in carbonate-coated heterogeneous media. Calcium carbonate coating increases hydrophobicity, delays breakthrough in high-permeability pathways, and significantly enhances sweep in low-permeability zones, reducing residual oil by up to 28%. CO2 foam flooding is highly sensitive to injection rate, with moderate flow rates producing stable foam, high gas saturation, and efficient oil mobilization, whereas very low or high rates reduce displacement stability. By combining microfluidic visualization and deep-learning image analysis, this research offers microscopic insights for optimizing CO2 flooding conditions and provides technical guidance for deploying CO2-based EOR in Middle Eastern carbonate reservoirs. The findings also support international cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative and contribute to global efforts in the low-carbon, efficient development of carbonate oilfields.

CLC number: X5 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-4956(2026)04-0039-07

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Experimental Technology and Management
Pages 39-45

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WANG X, MA K, WANG Q, et al. Analysis of the seepage mechanism of brine-CO2 oil displacement and storage in heterogeneous porous media with carbonate coating. Experimental Technology and Management, 2026, 43(4): 39-45. https://doi.org/10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.04.005

185

Views

3

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 04 November 2025
Published: 20 April 2026
© 2026 Experimental Technology and Management. All rights reserved.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).