AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Impact of Dual-Objective Control Strategy on Temperature Control in Direct-Cooling System and Energy Flow in Electric Vehicles

Chenguang Zhang1Kunfeng Liang1( )Haoyuan Chen1Lin Wang1Bin Chen2Yong Cao3Haolei Duan1Shuopeng Li1Dengyu Zhu1Yaru He1Dapeng Yang4
School of Vehicle and Traffic Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471003, China
Yuxin Auto Thermal Management Technology Co., Ltd., Xinxiang, 453000, China
CALB Technology Co., Ltd., Changzhou, 213000, China
China Lithium Battery Technology (Luoyang) Co., Ltd., Luoyang, 471000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Thermal-management systems for electric vehicles have become a key research focus for enhancing cabin thermal comfort and battery performance. This study proposes a direct-cooling system architecture to address the different temperature-response characteristics of cabins and power batteries. A dual-objective temperature-control strategy is developed based on ambient temperature, vehicle operating status, and real-time load temperature information, enabling the dynamic adjustment of thermal-control priorities between the cabin and battery to ensure optimal system performance. A thermal-management system test bench is constructed in an environmental chamber, and a simulation model of the vehicle thermal-management system is developed. Performance comparisons are conducted between the three control strategies under various driving conditions and ambient temperatures. The results demonstrate that the dual-objective strategy exhibits superior temperature-control capability and energy efficiency across different environmental conditions, along with optimal battery state-of-charge (SOC) recovery performance. Under 35 ℃ high-temperature conditions, the cabin and battery reach target temperatures within 51 s and 547 s, respectively. Under -7 ℃ low-temperature conditions, they reach preset values within 127 s and 365 s, respectively, with significantly improved SOC recovery rates. Although the dual-objective strategy slightly increases energy consumption (approximately 1.2%-3.0% higher than the cabin-priority strategy), it substantially enhances the battery thermal-control efficiency and overall system performance, demonstrating high potential for practical applications.

CLC number: TB66; U469.72 Document code: A Article ID: 0253-4339(2026)01-0127-11

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Refrigeration
Pages 127-137

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhang C, Liang K, Chen H, et al. Impact of Dual-Objective Control Strategy on Temperature Control in Direct-Cooling System and Energy Flow in Electric Vehicles. Journal of Refrigeration, 2026, 47(1): 127-137. https://doi.org/10.12465/issn.0253-4339.20241219001

611

Views

3

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

CSCD

Received: 19 December 2024
Revised: 12 March 2025
Accepted: 12 March 2025
Published: 16 February 2026
© 2026 The Editorial Office of Journal of Refrigeration

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).