AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

STAR Guideline Terminology(Ⅱ): Clinical Question Formulation, Evidence Retrieval and Appraisal, and Recommendation Development

Di ZHU1Haodong LI1Zijun WANG2Qianling SHI3Hui LIU2Yishan QIN2Yuanyuan YAO2Zhewei LI1Hongfeng HE1Jinhui TIAN2Long GE1,4( )Yaolong CHEN1,2,4,5,6,7,8( ) Methodology and Technology Specialisation Committee of the STAR Working Group
School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China
Institute of Health Data Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Research Unit of Evidence-based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Guidelines and Standards Research Center, Chinese Medical Association Publishing House, Lanzhou 730000, China
WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou 730000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To introduce and analyze guideline terminology related to clinical question formulation, evidence retrieval and appraisal, and recommendation development.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in guideline development manuals and relevant methodological literature, covering publications up to October 25, 2024. Terminology related to the three aforementioned stages of related to guideline development was extracted from the included literature, standardized, and refined through consensus meetings to finalize a comprehensive terminology list and definitions.

Results

A total of 30 guideline development manuals and 15 methodological articles were included, and 23 core terms were identified.

Conclusions

It is recommended to develop a standardized and scientifically sound guideline terminology system with unified naming, clear definitions, and alignment with the linguistic environment and usage habits in China. At the same time, it is essential to strengthen terminology training for both guideline developers and users based on this system, in order to deepen their correct understanding and proper application of guideline terminology.

CLC number: R181.2;C04 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-9081(2025)03-0756-09

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Pages 756-764

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHU D, LI H, WANG Z, et al. STAR Guideline Terminology(Ⅱ): Clinical Question Formulation, Evidence Retrieval and Appraisal, and Recommendation Development. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2025, 16(3): 756-764. https://doi.org/10.12290/xhyxzz.2025-0169

782

Views

21

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Scopus

3

CSCD

Received: 28 February 2025
Accepted: 31 March 2025
Published: 02 April 2025
© 2024 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital