AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Implementation Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Integrative Medicine

Ziying YE1,2Chen TIAN1,2Yilong YAN1Qiaofeng LI1Jinling NING1,2Tingting LI1Long GE1,2,3,4( )
Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Evidence-based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China
WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou 730000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To systematically assess the applicability of the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) integrating Chinese and western medicine, thereby providing reference for enhancing their future usability.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, SinoMed, WanFang Data, and CNKI databases were searched for guidelines for the integration of Chinese and western medicine. Supplementary searches of Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Medicine Administration, MedSci websites, Website of China Association of Chinese Medicine, Medlive, Website of Dangdang, Chinese Association of Integrative Medicine and World Federation of Traditional Chinese Medicine Societies were conducted. The search time frame was from inception of the databases to December 31, 2022. Four reviewers independently evaluated the implementability of clinical practice guidelines by using "Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) implementation evaluation tool".

Results

A total of 61 integrative Chinese and western medicine guidelines were included. Of the guidelines assessed, 9 guidelines(14.75%) exhibited strong implementability, 40(65.57%) demonstrated average implementability, and 12 (19.67%) demonstrated poor implementability. Among the 5 domains, the dimensions of "accessibility" and "implementability" were found to be of high quality, while those of "communication", "ease of identification" and "applicability" were relatively poor. Notably, compared to guidelines published between 2006—2016, those published between 2017—2022 showed improvements in the areas of "identification" and "application".

Conclusions

The implementabilityof the existing clinical practice guidelines of the integrative Chinese and western medicine is average and needs to be improved. In the future, emphasis should be placed on the integration of medical education and research, publicity of the guidelines, continuous medical education and training, a more concise form of recommendations, application of the guidelines by clinicians, and the implementability of the integrative Chinese and western medicine guideline.

CLC number: R181.2 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-9081(2024)02-0413-09

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Pages 413-421

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
YE Z, TIAN C, YAN Y, et al. Implementation Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Integrative Medicine. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(2): 413-421. https://doi.org/10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0198

878

Views

11

Downloads

0

Crossref

4

Scopus

4

CSCD

Received: 15 April 2023
Accepted: 23 May 2023
Published: 26 June 2023
© 2024 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital