AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases Article
PDF (868.4 KB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Prevention and Treatment Practice | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Comparison of clinical effects of three different materials used in apexification

Department of Stomatology, Songjiang District Central Hospital, Shanghai 201600, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To compare the clinical effect of three different kinds of materials used in apexification.

Methods

Sixty immature permanent teeth with pulpitis, pulp necrosis, periapical periodontitis were selected and randomly assigned to 3 groups according to registration order. Group A was treated with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), group B with Vitapex, and the control group with calcium hydroxide. All patients were recalled 3, 6 and 12 months after initial treatment.

Results

Pearson Chi-square test showed that the efficacy rate of group A was significantly higher than group B and the control group (P＜0.05) in the visits of 3 months and 6 months after treatment. And efficacy rate of group B is also higher than the control group, but no statistical difference was found between two groups in the final visit (12 months). The efficacy rate of group A is 94.1%, group B is 75.0% and the control group is 58.8%. The statistical difference was found between group A and control group, but it was not found between group A and group B or between group B and the control group.

Conclusion

Compared with calcium hydroxide and Viatapex, MTA for apexification has better performance in apexification.

Keywords

Immature toothApexificationMTAVitapexCalcium hydroxide paste
CLC number: R781.05 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2016)10-614-03

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Crossref Google Scholar
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Volume 24 Issue 10,
October 2016
Pages 614-616
DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.10.012

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Cite this Report
Close
Close
Cite this article:
WANG S-f, REN J-f. Comparison of clinical effects of three different materials used in apexification. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2016, 24(10): 614-616. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.10.012

467

Views

2

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus
Received: 04 December 2015
Revised: 09 January 2016
Published: 20 October 2016
© 2016 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.