AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases Article
PDF (833.1 KB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Clinical comparative study of the influences on the stability of peri-implant tissues between 3I and Osstem implants

Qi LI1, Kai-ying LI2, Ren-fa LAI2( ), Zhi-qiang FENG2, Xu-feng CHEN3
Department of Stomatology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University & Yuedong Hospital, Meizhou 514031, China
Department of Stomatology, Macao Enjian Health Care Center, Macao 999078，China
Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the influences on peri-implant soft tissues and bone tissues by 3I and Osstem implants.

Methods

42 patients underwent implant restoration(23 3I implants and 26 Osstem implants). 49 natural normal teeth were selected as comparison. The bone loss, sulcus bleeding index (SBI), plaque index (PLI), probing depth (PD), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level in peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) were measured at the time of 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the abutment connection. Analysis of data was performed by software SPSS 17.0.

Results

The bone loss of Osstem implant system was more than those of 3I implant system (P＜0.05). SBI and PLI of Osstem implant system were higher than that of 3I implant system at the time of 6, 9 and 12 months after abutment connection (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference of AST level in PICF between natural teeth and the 3I implant system, while AST level in PICF of Osstem system group was higher than that of natural teeth (P＜0.05). PD of 3I implant system was lower than that of Osstem implant (P＜0.05).

Conclusion

The influence level of 3I implant system on the surrounding peri-implant bone and periodontal tissues is less than that of Osstem implant system, but both implants showed a good clinical effect in the short period.

Keywords

3I implantOsstem implantBone resorptionPeri-implant tissueAspartate aminotransferase
CLC number: R783.4 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2016)08-477-05

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Crossref Google Scholar
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Volume 24 Issue 8,
August 2016
Pages 477-481
DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.08.009

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Cite this Report
Close
Close
Cite this article:
LI Q, LI K-y, LAI R-f, et al. Clinical comparative study of the influences on the stability of peri-implant tissues between 3I and Osstem implants. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2016, 24(8): 477-481. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.08.009

322

Views

2

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus
Received: 28 March 2016
Revised: 19 May 2016
Published: 20 August 2016
© 2016 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.