Journal Home > Volume 11 , Issue 1
Background

The habitat use and foraging behaviors of waterbirds are closely related to the distribution and abundance of their food resources. Reductions in food supply can cause waterbirds to shift their habitats and adjust their foraging behaviors to meet their nutritional requirements and increase fitness. Seasonal withdraw of the water levels in the river-connected lakes in the middle and lower Yangtze River floodplain provides abundant food resources for the wintering Greater White-fronted Goose (Anser albifrons). Sedge (Carex) meadows are critical foraging habitats for herbivorous waterbirds in the hydro-fluctuation belt, which changes with hydrological conditions and climate. This study aimed to examine the behavioral responses of the Greater White-fronted Goose to temporal- spatial changes of food availability in the Sedge meadows.

Methods

Fields surveys were carried out at Shengjin Lake from November 2017 to April 2018. According to the phenology of Shengjin Lake, we divided the wintering season into three periods. The food density, minimum temperature, food items, grass height, and number of foraging geese were surveyed, and samples of the foraging behavior were collected. We analyzed the relationship of the foraging behavior and habitat use relative to the food resources, using correlation and linear regression analyses.

Results

Along with the temporal-spatial variation and exploitation of food resources, the food abundance and items varied widely among the foraging sites. Over the whole wintering period, the foraging habitat with the highest utilization rate was the meadows, followed by the paddy fields, and then mudflats. Furthermore, the utilization of the meadows showed a bimodal distribution trend, while the paddy fields showed a unimodal trend, and a decreasing trend was seen in the mudflats over the whole wintering period. The results of the generalized linear model showed that the foraging rate was related to the food density and grass height, with a linearly increasing trend during the winter.

Conclusions

With the change of food resources in the three habitats, the habitats used by the Greater White-fronted Geese shifted from meadows in the hydro-fluctuation belt to the paddy fields, and then back to the meadows. The time budget for foraging activities increased correspondingly, and there was an increase in the foraging rate to compensate for food shortages.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Foraging behavior of the Greater White-fronted Goose (Anser albifrons) wintering at Shengjin Lake: diet shifts and habitat use

Show Author's information Yanguang Fan1,2Lizhi Zhou1,2( )Lei Cheng1,2Yunwei Song3Wenbin Xu3
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecosystem Protection and Restoration (Anhui University), Hefei 230601, China
Anhui Shengjin Lake National Nature Reserve, Dongzhi 247200, China

Abstract

Background

The habitat use and foraging behaviors of waterbirds are closely related to the distribution and abundance of their food resources. Reductions in food supply can cause waterbirds to shift their habitats and adjust their foraging behaviors to meet their nutritional requirements and increase fitness. Seasonal withdraw of the water levels in the river-connected lakes in the middle and lower Yangtze River floodplain provides abundant food resources for the wintering Greater White-fronted Goose (Anser albifrons). Sedge (Carex) meadows are critical foraging habitats for herbivorous waterbirds in the hydro-fluctuation belt, which changes with hydrological conditions and climate. This study aimed to examine the behavioral responses of the Greater White-fronted Goose to temporal- spatial changes of food availability in the Sedge meadows.

Methods

Fields surveys were carried out at Shengjin Lake from November 2017 to April 2018. According to the phenology of Shengjin Lake, we divided the wintering season into three periods. The food density, minimum temperature, food items, grass height, and number of foraging geese were surveyed, and samples of the foraging behavior were collected. We analyzed the relationship of the foraging behavior and habitat use relative to the food resources, using correlation and linear regression analyses.

Results

Along with the temporal-spatial variation and exploitation of food resources, the food abundance and items varied widely among the foraging sites. Over the whole wintering period, the foraging habitat with the highest utilization rate was the meadows, followed by the paddy fields, and then mudflats. Furthermore, the utilization of the meadows showed a bimodal distribution trend, while the paddy fields showed a unimodal trend, and a decreasing trend was seen in the mudflats over the whole wintering period. The results of the generalized linear model showed that the foraging rate was related to the food density and grass height, with a linearly increasing trend during the winter.

Conclusions

With the change of food resources in the three habitats, the habitats used by the Greater White-fronted Geese shifted from meadows in the hydro-fluctuation belt to the paddy fields, and then back to the meadows. The time budget for foraging activities increased correspondingly, and there was an increase in the foraging rate to compensate for food shortages.

Keywords: Habitat use, Foraging behavior, Foraging rate, Food resources, Grass height

References(55)

Aharon-Rotman Y, Mcevoy J, Zhaoju Z, Yu H, Wang X, Si Y, et al. Water level affects availability of optimal feeding habitats for threatened migratory waterbirds. Ecol Evol. 2017;7:10440-50.

Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F, editors. Proceeding of the 2nd international symposium on information theory. New York: Springer; 1973. p. 268-81.
Anderson DR. Model based inference in the life sciences: a primer on evidence. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 19-50.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74075-1
DOI

Bautista LM, Alonso JC, Alonso JA. A field test of ideal free distribution in flock-feeding common cranes. J Anim Ecol. 1995;64:747-57.

Beerens JM, Gawlik DE, Herring G, Cook MI. Dynamic habitat selection by two wading bird species with divergent foraging strategies in a seasonally fluctuating wetland. Auk. 2011;128:651-62.

Cao L, Fox AD. Birds and people both depend on China's wetlands. Nature. 2009;460:173.

Coops H, Beklioglu M, Crisman TL. The role of water-level fluctuations in shallow lake ecosystems—workshop conclusions. Hydrobiologia. 2003;506:23-7.

Durant D, Fritz H, Blais S, Duncan P. The functional response in three species of herbivorous Anatidae: effects of sward height, body mass and bill size. J Anim Ecol. 2003;72:220-31.

De Azevedo CS, Ferraz JB, Tinoco HP, Young RJ, Rodrigues M. Time-activity budget of greater rheas (Rhea americana, Aves) on a human-disturbed area: the role of habitat, time of the day, season and group size. Acta Ethol. 2010;13:109-17.

Faragó S, Hangya K. Effects of water level on water-bird abundance and diversity along the middle section of the Danube River. Hydrobiologia. 2012;697:15-21.

Fox AD, Abraham KF. Why geese benefit from the transition from natural vegetation to agriculture. Ambio. 2017;46:188-97.

Fox AD, Gitay H, Boyd H, Tomlinson C. Snow-patch foraging by pink-footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus in south Iceland. Ecography. 1991;14:81-4.

Fox AD, Hearn RD, Cao L, Cong PH, Wang X, Zhang Y, et al. Preliminary observations of diurnal feeding patterns of swan geese (Anser cygnoides) using two different habitats at Shengjin Lake, Anhui Province, China. Wildfowl. 2008;58:20-30.

Fox AD, Cao L, Zhang Y, Barter M, Zhao MJ, Meng FJ, et al. Declines in the tuber-feeding waterbird guild at Shengjin Lake National Nature Reserve, China—a barometer of submerged macrophyte collapse. Aquat Conserv. 2011;21:82-91.

Guan L, Wen L, Feng D, Zhang H, Lei G. Delayed flood recession in central Yangtze floodplains can cause significant food shortages for wintering geese: results of inundation experiment. Environ Manag. 2014;54:1331-41.

Gyimesi A, Franken MS, Feige N, Nolet BA. Human disturbance of Bewick's Swans is reflected in giving-up net energy intake rate, but not in giving-up food density. Ibis. 2012;154:781-90.

Holm TE. Habitat use and activity patterns of Mute Swans at a molting and a wintering site in Denmark. Waterbirds. 2002;25:183-91.

Jia YF. Impact of water level fluctuation on Siberian Crane and other wintering waterbirds in Poyang Lake. Ph.D. thesis. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University; 2013 (in Chinese).

Jing K, Ma ZJ, Li B, Li JH, Chen JK. Foraging strategies involved in habitat use of shorebirds at the intertidal area of Chongming Dongtan, China. Ecol Res. 2007;22:559-70.

Jing L, Lu C, Xia Y, Shi L, Zuo A, Lei J, et al. Effects of hydrological regime on development of Carex wet meadows in East Dongting Lake, a Ramsar Wetland for wintering waterbirds. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41761.

Klaassen RHG, Nolet BA, Bankert D. Movement of foraging tundra swans explained by spatial pattern in cryptic food densities. Ecology. 2006;87:2244-54.

Kuwae T, Miyoshi E, Sassa S, Watabe Y. Foraging mode shift in varying environmental conditions by dunlin Calidris alpina. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2010;406:281-9.

Lafever KE. Spatial and temporal winter territory use and behavioral responses of Whooping Cranes to human activities. Texas: Texas A & M University; 2006.

Li D, Chen S, Lloyd H, Zhu S, Shan KAI, Zhang Z. The importance of artificial habitats to migratory waterbirds within a natural/artificial wetland mosaic, Yellow River Delta, China. Bird Conserv Int. 2013a;23:184-98.

Li ZQ, Wang Z, Ge C. Time budgets of wintering Red-crowned Cranes: effects of habitat, age and family size. Wetlands. 2013;33:227-32.

Long S, Zhou C, Wang W, Pan L, Hu J. Diurnal behavioral rhythm, time budgets and group behavior of dwarf blue sheep in summer. Zool Res. 2009;30:687-93.

Maeda T. Patterns of bird abundance and habitat use in rice fields of the Kanto Plain, central Japan. Ecol Res. 2001;16:569-85.

Maheswaran G, Rahmani AR. Effects of water level changes and wading bird abundance on the foraging behavior of black necked Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus in Dudwa National Park, India. J Biosci. 2001;26:373-82.

Nolet BA, Bevan RM, Klaassen M, Langevoord O, Van der Heijden YGJT. Habitat switching by Bewick's swans: maximization of average long-term energy gain? J Anim Ecol. 2002;71:979-93.

Owensmith N. How high ambient temperature affects the daily activity and foraging time of a subtropical ungulate, the greater kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros). J Zool. 2010;246:183-92.

Páez DJ, Restif O, Eby P, Plowright RK. Optimal foraging in seasonal environments: implications for residency of Australian flying foxes in food-subsidized urban landscapes. P Roy Soc B Biol Sci. 2018;373:20170097.

Pearse AT, Alisauskas RT, Krapu GL, Cox RR Jr. Changes in nutrient dynamics of midcontinent Greater White-fronted Geese during spring migration. J Wildlife Manag. 2011;75:1716-23.

Recher HF, Davis WE. Foraging behavior of mulga birds in Western Australia. I. Use of resources and temporal effects. Pacific Conserv Biol. 2018;24:74-86.

Shimada T. Daily activity pattern and habitat use of Greater White-fronted Geese wintering in Japan: factors of the population increase. Waterbirds. 2002;25:371-7.

Shimada T, Hatakeyama S, Miyabayashi Y, Kurechi M. Effects of climatic conditions on the northward expansion of the wintering range of the Greater White-fronted Goose in Japan. Ornithol Sci. 2005;4:155-9.

Steuer P, Hummel J, Grosse-Brinkhaus C, Südekum KH. Food intake rates of herbivorous mammals and birds and the influence of body mass. Eur J Wildlife Res. 2015;61:91-102.

Symonds MRE, Moussalli A. A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioral ecology using Akaike's information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65:13-21.

Therkildsen OR, Madsen J. Assessment of food intake rates in pink-footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus based on examination of oesophagus contents. Wildlife Biol. 2000;6:167-72.

Toral GM, David A, Bustamante J, Figuerola J. Using Landsat images to map habitat availability for waterbirds in rice fields. Ibis. 2011;153:684-94.

Van der Graff AJ, Coehoorn P, Stahl J. Sward height and bite size affect the functional response of barnacle geese Branta leucopsis. J Ornithol. 2006;147:479-84.

Wang X, Fox AD, Zhuang X, Cao L, Meng F, Cong P. Shifting to an energy-poor diet for nitrogen? Not the case for wintering herbivorous lesser white-fronted Geese in China. J Ornithol. 2014;155:707-12.

Wang L, Wang C, Deng DG, Zhao X, Zhou Z. Temporal and spatial variations in phytoplankton: correlations with environmental factors in Shengjin Lake, China. Environ Sci Pollut R. 2015;22:14144-56.

Wantzen KM, Rothhaupt KO, Mortl M, Cantonati M, László G, Fischer P. Ecological effects of water-level fluctuations in lakes: an urgent issue. Hydrobiologio. 2008;613:1-4.

Wilmshurst JF, Fryxell JM, Hudsonb RJ. Forage quality and patch choice by wapiti (Cervus elaphus). Behav Ecol. 1995;6:209-17.

Woog F, Schwarz K, Hulme M. All you can eat: do peck rates of Greylag Geese (Anser anser) vary with age and social status? J Ornithol. 2012;153:1025-9.

Xia SX, Liu Y, Chen B, Jia Y, Zhang H, Liu G, et al. Effect of water level fluctuations on wintering goose abundance in Poyang Lake wetlands of China. Chin Geogr Sci. 2017;27:248-58.

Xu LL, Xu WB, Sun QY, Zhou ZZ, Shen J, Zhao XX. Flora and vegetation in Shengjin Lake. Wuhan Bot Res. 2008;26:264-70 (in Chinese).

Yang XL. Research on the numbers, distribution, feeding behavior and diet of Great White-fronted Geese at Shengjin Lake, the national natural reserves in Anhui Province. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China; 2011 (in Chinese).

Yang GS, Ma GH, Zhang L, Jiang JH, Yao SC, Zhang M, et al. Lake status, major problems and protection strategy in China. J Lake Sci. 2010;22:799-810 (in Chinese).

Zhao M, Cong P, Barter M, Fox AD, Cao LEI. The changing abundance and distribution of Greater White-fronted Geese Anser albifrons in the Yangtze River floodplain: impacts of recent hydrological changes. Bird Conserv Int. 2012;22:135-43.

Zhang XC, Qing HM, Jin BS, Chen JK, Wu JD, Liu GH, et al. Distribution in winter buds of submerged macrophyte and their contribution for herbivorous waterfowl in a shallow dish lake of Poyang Lake. Acta Ecol Sin. 2014;34:6589-96 (in Chinese).

Zhang DM, Zhou LZ, Song YW. Effect of water level fluctuations on temporal-spatial patterns of foraging activities by the wintering hooded crane (Grus monacha). Avian Res. 2015;6:16.

Zhang P, Zou Y, Xie Y, Zhang H, Liu X, Gao D, et al. Shifts in distribution of herbivorous geese relative to hydrological variation in East Dongting Lake wetland, China. Sci Total Environ. 2018;636:30-8.

Zheng M, Zhou L, Zhao N, Xu W. Effects of variation in food resources on foraging habitat use by wintering Hooded cranes (Grus monacha). Avian Res. 2015;6:11.

Zhou B, Zhou LZ, Chen JY, Cheng YQ, Xu WB. Diurnal time-activity budgets of wintering Hooded cranes (Grus monacha) in Shengjin Lake, China. Waterbirds. 2010;33:110-5.

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 08 April 2019
Accepted: 15 January 2020
Published: 05 February 2020
Issue date: January 2020

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2020.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of Anhui Shengjin Lake National Nature Reserve for their help with the field work.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Return