Journal Home > Volume 6 , Issue 1
Background

The Yangtze River floodplain provides important wintering habitats for Hooded Cranes (Grus monacha) in China. Fluctuations in the water level change foraging habitat and food availability, affecting their temporal-spatial patterns of foraging activities. It is of considerable importance to investigate the effect of these fluctuations on food availability for wintering Hooded Cranes and their foraging response to these changes. Understanding their behavior patterns is beneficial in protecting the wintering crane population and restoring their wintering habitats.

Methods

A field survey of the winter behavior of cranes was carried out at Shengjin Lake from November in 2013 to April in 2014. Habitat variables, as well as the spatial distribution and behavior patterns of wintering cranes at their foraging sites during five stages of water level fluctuation were collected. Based on this data we analyzed the relationship of foraging behavior relative to water level fluctuations and habitat types.

Results

The foraging habitats used by Hooded Cranes varied at the different water level stages. As the water level decreased, the use of meadows and mudflats increased. When the water dropped to its lowest level, the use by the Hooded Crane in the mudflats reached a peak. There were statistically significant differences in time budget in the three types of habitats over the five stages of the water level. In the mudflats, the foraging behavior and maintenance behavior varied significantly with the water level, while the alert behavior showed little variation. Analysis of a generalized linear model showed that the five water level stages and three habitat types had a significant effect on foraging behavior, while the combined effect of these two variables was significant on the foraging time budget and the length of foraging activity of the Hooded Crane.

Conclusions

With the decrease in the water level, the use of mudflats by Hooded Cranes increased correspondingly. Food availability in different habitats was affected by changes in the water level. The Hooded Crane adjusted its foraging patterns and made full use of the three available types of habitat in order to acquire enough food in response to fluctuations in the water level.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Effect of water level fluctuations on temporal-spatial patterns of foraging activities by the wintering Hooded Crane (Grus monacha)

Show Author's information Dongmei Zhang1,2,3Lizhi Zhou1,2,3( )Yunwei Song1,2,3,4
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, 111 Jiulong Road, Hefei 230601, China
Institute of Biodiversity and Wetland Ecology, Anhui University, 111 Jiulong Road, Hefei 230601, China
Anhui Biodiversity Information Center, 111 Jiulong Road, Hefei 230601, China
Shengjin Lake National Nature Reserve of Anhui Province, Chizhou 247200, China

Abstract

Background

The Yangtze River floodplain provides important wintering habitats for Hooded Cranes (Grus monacha) in China. Fluctuations in the water level change foraging habitat and food availability, affecting their temporal-spatial patterns of foraging activities. It is of considerable importance to investigate the effect of these fluctuations on food availability for wintering Hooded Cranes and their foraging response to these changes. Understanding their behavior patterns is beneficial in protecting the wintering crane population and restoring their wintering habitats.

Methods

A field survey of the winter behavior of cranes was carried out at Shengjin Lake from November in 2013 to April in 2014. Habitat variables, as well as the spatial distribution and behavior patterns of wintering cranes at their foraging sites during five stages of water level fluctuation were collected. Based on this data we analyzed the relationship of foraging behavior relative to water level fluctuations and habitat types.

Results

The foraging habitats used by Hooded Cranes varied at the different water level stages. As the water level decreased, the use of meadows and mudflats increased. When the water dropped to its lowest level, the use by the Hooded Crane in the mudflats reached a peak. There were statistically significant differences in time budget in the three types of habitats over the five stages of the water level. In the mudflats, the foraging behavior and maintenance behavior varied significantly with the water level, while the alert behavior showed little variation. Analysis of a generalized linear model showed that the five water level stages and three habitat types had a significant effect on foraging behavior, while the combined effect of these two variables was significant on the foraging time budget and the length of foraging activity of the Hooded Crane.

Conclusions

With the decrease in the water level, the use of mudflats by Hooded Cranes increased correspondingly. Food availability in different habitats was affected by changes in the water level. The Hooded Crane adjusted its foraging patterns and made full use of the three available types of habitat in order to acquire enough food in response to fluctuations in the water level.

Keywords: Hooded Crane, Water level fluctuations, Foraging activity, Temporal-spatial pattern, Grus monacha

References(65)

1

Beerens JM, Gawlik DE, Herring G, Cook MI (2011) Dynamic habitat selection by two wading bird speices with divergent foraging strategies in a seasonally fluctuation wetland. Auk 128(4):651-662

2

Marra PP, Hobson KA, Holmes RT (1998) Linking winter and summer events in a migratory bird by using stable carbon isotopes. Science 282:1884-1886

3

May R, Mclean A (2010) Theoretical ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

4

Kuwae T, Miyoshi E, Sassa S, Watabe Y (2010) Foraging mode shift in varying environmental conditions by dunlin Calidris alpina. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 406:281-289

5

Farago S, Hangya K (2012) Effects of water level on waterbird abundance and diversity along the middle section of the Danube River. Hydrobiologia 697(1):15-21

6

Kushlan JA (1978) Nonrigorous foraging by robbing egrets. Ecology 59(4):649-653

7

Maheswaran G, Rahmani AR (2001) Effects of water level changes and wading bird abundance on the foraging behavior of black necked storks Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus in Dudwa National Park, India. J Biosci 26(3):373-382

8

Lantz SM, Gawlik DE, Cook MI (2010) The effects of water depth and submerged aquatic vegetation on the selection of foraging habitat and foraging success of wading birds. Condor 112(3):460-469

9

Master TL, Lesier JK, Bennett KA (2005) Patch selection by Snowy Egrets. Colon Waterbird 28:220-224

10

Lewis TL, Esler D, Boyd WS (2008) Foraging behavior of Surf Scoters (Melanitta perspicillata) and White-Winged Scoters (M. fusca) in relation to clam density: inferring food availability and habitat quality. Auk 125(1):149-157

11
Loftus WF, Eklund AM (1994) Long-term dynamics of an Everglades small-fish assemblage. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 461-483
12

Russell GJ, Bass OL Jr, Pimm SL (2002) The effect of hydrological patterns and breeding-season flooding on the numbers and distribution of wading birds in Everglades National Park. Anim Conserv 5:185-199

13

Baschuk MS, Koper N, Wrubleski DA, Goldsborough G (2012) Effects of water depth, cover and food resources on habitat use of marsh birds and waterfowl in boreal wetlands of Manitoba, Canada. Waterbirds 35(1):44-55

14

Holm TE, Clausen P (2006) Effects of water level management on autumn staging waterbird and macrophyte diversity in three Danish coastal lagoons. Biodiv Conserv 15:4399-4423

15

Bancroft GT, Gawlik DE, Rutchey K (2002) Distribution of wading birds relative to vegetation and water depths in the northern Everglades of Florida, USA. Waterbirds 25:265-277

16

Jing K, Ma ZJ, Li B, Li JH, Chen JK (2007) Foraging strategies involved in habitat use of shorebirds at the intertidal area of Chongming Dongtan, China. Ecol Res 22:559-570

17

Beauchamp G (2006) Spatial, temporal and weather factors influencing the foraging behavior of migrating Semipalmated Sandpipers. Waterbirds 29(2):221-225

18

Pienkowski MW (1983) Surface activity of some intertidal invertebrates in relation to temperature and the foraging behaviour of their shorebird predators. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 11:141-150

19

Zhao F, Zhou L, Xu W (2013) Habitat utilization and resource partitioning of wintering Hooded Cranes and three goose species at Shengjin Lake. Chin Birds 4:281-290

20

Cao L, Barter M, Zhao MJ, Meng HX, Zhang Y (2011) A systematic scheme for monitoring waterbird populations at Shengjin Lake, China: methodology and preliminary results. Chin Birds 2:1-17

21

Liu ZY, Xu WB, Wang QS, Shi KC, Xu JS, Yu GQ (2001) Environmental carrying capacity for over wintering Hooded Cranes in Shengjin Lake. Resour Envir Yangtze Basin 10(5):454-459

22

Cao L, Fox AD (2009) Birds and people both depend on China's wetlands. Nature 460:173

23
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife international red data book. BirdLife International, Cambridge, pp 1174-1179
24

Yang GS, Ma GH, Zhang L, Jiang JH, Yao SC, Zhang M et al (2010) Lake status, major problems and protection strategy in China. J Lake Sci 22(6):799-810

25

Fox AD, Cao L, Zhang Y, Barter M, Zhao MJ, Meng FJ et al (2011) Declines in the tuber-feeding waterbird guild at Shengjin Lake National Nature Reserve, China—a barometer of submerged macrophyte collapse. Aquatic Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 21:82-91

26

Li ZQ, Wang Z, Ge C (2013) Time budgets of wintering Red-Crowned Cranes: effects of habitat, age and family size. Wetlands 33:227-232

27

Wood C, Qiao Y, Li P, Ding P, Lu BZ, Xi YM (2010) Implications of rice agriculture for wild birds in China. Waterbirds 33(Sp1):30-43

28

Aviles JM (2003) Time budget and habitat use of the Common Crane wintering in dehesas of southwestern Spain. Can J Zool 81:1233-1238

29

Erwin RM (1983) Feeding habitats of nesting wading birds: spatial use and social influences. Auk 100:960-970

30
BirdLife International (2012) Grus monacha. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2015.2. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 2 Aug 2015
31

Jiao SW, Guo YM, Falk H, Lei GC (2014) Nest-site selection analysis of Hooded Crane (Grus monacha) in Northeastern China based on a multivariate ensemble model. Zoolog Sci 31:430-437

32
Luo ZJ (2012) Habitat selection of Hooded Crane (Grus monacha) wintering at the lakes of Yangtze River Floodplain in Anhui Province. Master's Thesis. Anhui University
33

Fox AD, Hearn RD, Cao L (2008) Preliminary observations of diurnal feeding patterns of swan geese (Anser cygnoides) using two different habitats at Shengjin Lake, Anhui Province, China. Wildfowl 58:20-30

34

James H (2000) Migratory stopover and wintering locations in eastern China used by White-naped Cranes Grus vipio and Hooded Cranes G. monacha as determined by satellite tracking. Forktail 16:93-99

35

Zhou B, Zhou LZ, Chen JY, Cheng YQ, Xu WB (2010) Diurnal time-activity budgets of wintering Hooded cranes (Grus monacha) in Shengjin Lake, China. Waterbirds 33(1):110-115

36

Xu LL, Xu WB, Sun QY, Zhou ZZ, Shen J, Zhao XX (2008) Flora and vegetation in Shengjin Lake. J Wuhan Botan Res 27(3):264-270

37
Yang XL (2011) Research on the numbers, distribution, feeding behavior and diet of Great White Fronted Geese at Shengjin Lake, the national natural reserves in Anhui Province. Master's Thesis. University of Science and Technology of China
38

Ma ZJ, Li B, Jing K, Zhao B, Tang SM, Chen JK (2003) Effects of tidewater on the feeding ecology of Hooded Crane (Grus monacha) and conservation of their wintering habitats at ChongmingDongtan, China. Ecol Res 18:321-329

39

Zhao C, Li YH, Hu J, Yao G, He Q, Li HY et al (2012) Feeding sites selection of long-billed plover in winter at the middle reaches of Jialing River. Sichuan J Zool 31(1):22-26

40
Jia YF (2013) Impact of water level fluctuation on Siberian Crane and other wintering waterbirds in Poyang Lake. PhD Thesis. Beijing Forestry University, Beijing
41
Lamoot I (2004) Foraging behaviour and habitat use of large herbivores in a coastal dune landscape. PhD Thesis. Universiteit Gent, Gent
42

Azevedo CS, Ferraz JB, Tinoco HP, Young RJ, Rodrigues M (2010) Time-activity budget of greater rheas (Rhea Americana, Aves) on a human-disturbed area: the role of habitat, time of the day, season and group size. Acta Ethol 13:109-117

43

Gyimesi A, Franken MS, Feige N, Nolet BA (2012) Human disturbance of Bewick's Swans is reflected in giving-up net energy intake rate, but not in giving-up food density. Ibis 154(4):781-790

44
Lafever KE (2006) Spatial and temporal winter territory use and behavioral responses of Whooping Cranes to human activities. Doctoral Dissertation. Texas A & M University
45

Coops H, Beklioglu M, Crisman TL (2003) The role of water-level fluctuations in shallow lake ecosystems—workshop conclusions. Hydrobiologia 506-509:23-27

46

Wantzen KM, Rothhaupt KO, Mortl M, Cantonati M, Toth LG, Fischer P (2008) Ecological effects of water-level fluctuations in lakes: an urgent issue. Hydrobiologia 613:1-4

47

Bolduc F, Afton AD (2008) Monitoring waterbird abundance in wetlands: the importance of controlling results for variation in water depth. Ecol Model 216(3):402-408

48

Dimalexis A, Pyrovetsi M (1997) Effect of water level fluctuations on wading bird foraging habitat use at an Irrigatio Reservoir, Lake Kerkini, Greece. Colon Waterbird 20(2):244-252

49

Rajpar MN, Zakaria M (2011) Effects of water level fluctuation on waterbirds distribution and aquatic vegetation composition at natura wetland reserve, Peninsular Malaysia. ISRN Ecol 2011:1-13

50

Li YK, Shan JH, Ma JZ, Miu LJ, Li J, Yuan FK et al (2014) The effects of climate and water level fluctuation on the wintering population of Oriental White Stork. Chin J Ecol 33(4):1061-1067

51

Kushlan JA (1986) Responses of wading birds to seasonally fluctuating water levels: strategies and their limits. Colon Waterbird 2(9):155-162

52
Krebs JR (1978) Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 23-63
53

Macarthur R, Recher H, Cody M (1966) On the relation between habitat selection and species diversity. Amer Natur 100:319-332

54

Stephens DW (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

DOI
55
Paulus SL (1988) Time-activity budgets of nonbreeding Anatidae: a review. In: Weller MW (ed) Waterfowl in winter. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 135-152
56

Woodin MC, Michot TC (2006) Foraging behavior of redheads (Aythya americana) wintering in Texas and Louisiana. Hydrobiologia 567:129-141

57

Lee SD, Jabtonski PG, Higuchi H (2007) Winter foraging of threatened cranes in the Demilitarized Zone of Korea: behavioral evidence for the conservation importance of unplowed rice fields. Biol Conserv 138:286-289

58

Jing K, Tang SM, Chen JK, Ma ZJ (2002) Primary research on the characteristics of feeding sites of Grus monacha in the east tide flat of Chongming. Zool Res 23(1):84-88

59

Riis T, Hawes I (2002) Relationships between water level fluctuations and vegetation diversity in shallow water of New Zealand lakes. Aquat Bot 74:133-148

60
Zheng M (2014) The effects of food resource dynamics on foraging behaviors of wintering Hooded Cranes (Grus monacha) over spatio-temporal scales. Master's Thesis. Anhui Universityhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-015-0020-3
DOI
61

Aborn DA (2010) Behavior and habitat use of Greater Sandhill Cranes wintering in east Tennessee. Crane Workshop 11:9-14

62

Slobodkin LB (1974) Prudent predation does not require group selection. Amer Natur 108:665-678

63

Coops H, Hosper SH (2002) Water-level management as a tool for the restoration of Shallow Lake in the Netherlands. Lake Reserv Manag 18(4):293-298

64

Gawlik DE (2006) The role of wildlife science in wetland ecosystem restoration: lessons from the Everglades. Ecol Eng 26:70-83

65

Zhu WZ, Zhou LZ (2010) Biodoversity and conservation in Anqing floodplain wetlands. Hefei University of Technology Press, Hefei

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 15 February 2015
Accepted: 22 July 2015
Published: 05 August 2015
Issue date: January 2015

Copyright

© 2015 Zhang et al.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 31172117, 31472020) and the Graduate Student Innovation Research Projects of Anhui University (YQH100269). We express appreciation to Dr. Chunlin Li for his helpful comments and suggestions on our study and the staff of the Shengjin Lake National N. R. for their helps in the field work.

Rights and permissions

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Return