Journal Home > Volume 22 , Issue 1

In the last decade, as an emerging transaction measure driven by computer and internet technology, e-commerce experienced explosive growth in many areas. It has greatly broken down the limitations of space and time to economic activities, thus changing the rules of business fundamentally. Significant work has been done to understand the laws of e-commerce from multiple dimensions, but the question of how e-commerce shapes firms’ specialization and market structure from the perspective of spatial factors remains obscure. In this paper, we propose a simple and symmetric firm resource allocation model with a specialized-economy production function and market size constraint, to investigate how individual firms adjust resource allocation with reachable transaction scope expanded. It is shown that with the expansion of reachable transaction scope, individual firms discretely take back one unit resource from a low-investment direction and, instead, channel it to a “specialized direction”. Meanwhile, at the macro level, an optimal division network evolves from a static self-sufficient stage to a diverse semi-specialized stage, and finally to a highly integrated completely specialized stage. Ergo, a Complex Adaptive System (CAS) based simulation framework is constructed. Designed simulation experiments are carried out and confirm to the analysis result of our proposed model.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Evolution of Specialization with Reachable Transaction Scope Based on a Simple and Symmetric Firm Resource Allocation Model

Show Author's information Xiao SunYueting Chai( )Yi LiuJianping ShenYadong Huang
National Engineering Laboratory for E-Commerce Technologies (NELECT), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Abstract

In the last decade, as an emerging transaction measure driven by computer and internet technology, e-commerce experienced explosive growth in many areas. It has greatly broken down the limitations of space and time to economic activities, thus changing the rules of business fundamentally. Significant work has been done to understand the laws of e-commerce from multiple dimensions, but the question of how e-commerce shapes firms’ specialization and market structure from the perspective of spatial factors remains obscure. In this paper, we propose a simple and symmetric firm resource allocation model with a specialized-economy production function and market size constraint, to investigate how individual firms adjust resource allocation with reachable transaction scope expanded. It is shown that with the expansion of reachable transaction scope, individual firms discretely take back one unit resource from a low-investment direction and, instead, channel it to a “specialized direction”. Meanwhile, at the macro level, an optimal division network evolves from a static self-sufficient stage to a diverse semi-specialized stage, and finally to a highly integrated completely specialized stage. Ergo, a Complex Adaptive System (CAS) based simulation framework is constructed. Designed simulation experiments are carried out and confirm to the analysis result of our proposed model.

Keywords: resource allocation, evolution, e-commerce, reachable transaction scope, complex adaptive system

References(30)

[1]
Siau K., Nah F., Tian Y. H., and Ling M., Knowledge management mechanisms in e-commerce: A study of online retailing and auction sites, Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 42, pp. 119-128, 2002.
[2]
Gregg D. G. and Walczak S., Auction advisor: An agent-based online-auction decision support system, Decision Support Systems, vol. 41, pp. 449-471, 2006.
[3]
Pickernell D., Jones P., Packham G., Thomas B., White G., and Willis R., E-commerce trading activity and the SME sector: An FSB perspective, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, vol. 20, pp. 866-888, 2013.
[4]
Rambo K. and Liu K., Articulating stakeholders perspectives of culture-sensitive e-commerce design targeting female consumers in Saudi Arabia, in IEEE International Conference on Information Society, 2010, pp. 449-454.
DOI
[5]
Huang Z. and Benyoucef M., From e-commerce to social commerce: A close look at design features, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, vol. 12, pp. 246-259, 2013.
[6]
Morid M. A. and Shajari M., An enhanced e-commerce trust model for community based centralized systems, Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 12, pp. 409-427, 2012.
[7]
Wu F., Li H. H., and Kuo Y. H., Reputation evaluation for choosing a trustworthy counterparty in C2C e-commerce, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, vol. 10, pp. 428-436, 2011.
[8]
Zhu Y., Research on the data and transaction security of enterprise e-commerce countermeasure, International Journal of Security and Its Applications, vol. 7, pp. 259-268, 2013.
[9]
Chen L. and Wang F., Preference-based clustering reviews for augmenting e-commerce recommendation, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 50, pp. 44-59, 2013.
[10]
Nederstigt L. J., Aanen S. S., Vandic D., and Frasincar F., Floppies: A framework for large-scale ontology population of product information from tabular data in e-commerce stores, Decision Support Systems, vol. 59, pp. 296-311, 2013.
[11]
Nath P., Nachiappan S., and Ramanathan R., The impact of marketing capability, operations capability and diversification strategy on performance: A resource-based view, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 39, pp. 317-329, 2010.
[12]
Coen C. A. and Maritan C. A., Investing in capabilities: The dynamics of resource allocation, Organization Science, vol. 22, pp. 99-117, 2011.
[13]
Anders G., Steghofer J. P., Siefert F., and Reif W, A trust-and cooperation-based solution of a dynamic resource allocation problem, in Proc. 7th IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, 2013, pp. 1-10.
DOI
[14]
Yang X., Endogenous vs. exogenous comparative advantage and economies of specialization vs. economies of scale, Journal of Economics, vol. 60, pp. 29-54, 1994.
[15]
Cheng W., Sachs J., and Yang X., An inframarginal analysis of the Ricardian model, Review of International Economics, vol. 8, pp. 208-220, 2000.
[16]
Sachs J., Yang X., and Zhang D., Globalization, dual economy, and economic development, China Economic Review, vol. 11, pp. 189-209, 2000.
[17]
Liu P. W. and Yang X., The theory of irrelevance of the size of the firm, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 42, pp. 145-165, 2000.
[18]
Holland J. H., Studying complex adaptive systems, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, vol. 19, pp. 1-8, 2006.
[19]
Markose S. M., Computability and evolutionary complexity: Markets as complex adaptive systems (CAS), The Economic Journal, vol. 115, pp. 159-192, 2005.
[20]
Surana A., Kumara S., Greaves M., and Raghavan U. N., Supply-chain networks: A complex adaptive systems perspective, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 43, pp. 4235-4265, 2005.
[21]
Choi T. Y.Dooley K. J., and Rungtusanatham M., Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 19, pp. 351-366, 2001.
[22]
Romero E. and Ruiz M. C., Framework for applying a complex adaptive system approach to model the operation of eco-industrial parks, Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 17, pp. 731-741, 2013.
[23]
Fleming L. and Sorenson O., Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data, Research Policy, vol. 30, pp. 1019-1039, 2001.
[24]
Mccarthy I. P., Tsinopoulos C., Allen P., and Rose-Anderssen C., New product development as a complex adaptive system of decisions, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 23, pp. 437-456, 2006.
[25]
Zhao L., Yang G., Wang W., Chen Y., Huang J. P., Ohashi H., and Stanley H. E., Herd behavior in a complex adaptive system, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 108, pp. 15058-15063, 2011.
[26]
Song K., An K., Yang G., and Huang J., Risk-return relationship in a complex adaptive system, PloS one, vol. 7, p. 33588, 2012.
[27]
Li G.. Ji P., Sun L. Y., and Lee W. B., Modeling and simulation of supply network evolution based on complex adaptive system and fitness landscape, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 56, pp. 839-853, 2009.
[28]
Rammel C., Stagl S., and Wilfing H., Managing complex adaptive systems-A co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management, Ecological Economics, vol. 63, pp. 9-21, 2007.
[29]
Janssen M. A., Walker B. H., Langridge J., and Abel N., An adaptive agent model for analysing co-evolution of management and policies in a complex rangeland system, Ecological Modelling, vol. 131, pp. 249-268, 2000.
[30]
Piao C., Han X., and Wu H., Research on e-commerce transaction networks using multi-agent modelling and open application programming interface, Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 4, pp. 329-353, 2010.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 25 January 2016
Accepted: 04 February 2016
Published: 26 January 2017
Issue date: February 2017

Copyright

© The author(s) 2017

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Technology Research and Development Program (No. 2015BAH18F04).

Rights and permissions

Return