399
Views
26
Downloads
9
Crossref
N/A
WoS
5
Scopus
N/A
CSCD
This paper aims to explore whether drivers would adapt their behavior when they drive among automated vehicles (AVs) compared to driving among manually driven vehicles (MVs).Understanding behavioral adaptation of drivers when they encounter AVs is crucial for assessing impacts of AVs in mixed-traffic situations. Here, mixed-traffic situations refer to situations where AVs share the roads with existing nonautomated vehicles such as conventional MVs.
A driving simulator study is designed to explore whether such behavioral adaptations exist. Two different driving scenarios were explored on a three-lane highway: driving on the main highway and merging from an on-ramp. For this study, 18 research participants were recruited.
Behavioral adaptation can be observed in terms of car-following speed, car-following time gap, number of lane change and overall driving speed. The adaptations are dependent on the driving scenario and whether the surrounding traffic was AVs or MVs. Although significant differences in behavior were found in more than 90% of the research participants, they adapted their behavior differently, and thus, magnitude of the behavioral adaptation remains unclear.
The observed behavioral adaptations in this paper were dependent on the driving scenario rather than the time gap between surrounding vehicles. This finding differs from previous studies, which have shown that drivers tend to adapt their behaviors with respect to the surrounding vehicles. Furthermore, the surrounding vehicles in this study are more “free flow'” compared to previous studies with a fixed formation such as platoons. Nevertheless, long-term observations are required to further support this claim.
This paper aims to explore whether drivers would adapt their behavior when they drive among automated vehicles (AVs) compared to driving among manually driven vehicles (MVs).Understanding behavioral adaptation of drivers when they encounter AVs is crucial for assessing impacts of AVs in mixed-traffic situations. Here, mixed-traffic situations refer to situations where AVs share the roads with existing nonautomated vehicles such as conventional MVs.
A driving simulator study is designed to explore whether such behavioral adaptations exist. Two different driving scenarios were explored on a three-lane highway: driving on the main highway and merging from an on-ramp. For this study, 18 research participants were recruited.
Behavioral adaptation can be observed in terms of car-following speed, car-following time gap, number of lane change and overall driving speed. The adaptations are dependent on the driving scenario and whether the surrounding traffic was AVs or MVs. Although significant differences in behavior were found in more than 90% of the research participants, they adapted their behavior differently, and thus, magnitude of the behavioral adaptation remains unclear.
The observed behavioral adaptations in this paper were dependent on the driving scenario rather than the time gap between surrounding vehicles. This finding differs from previous studies, which have shown that drivers tend to adapt their behaviors with respect to the surrounding vehicles. Furthermore, the surrounding vehicles in this study are more “free flow'” compared to previous studies with a fixed formation such as platoons. Nevertheless, long-term observations are required to further support this claim.
Andreotti, E., P., . and Boyraz, Selpi. (2020), “Safety-centred analysis of transition stages to traffic with fully autonomous vehicles”, IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294644.
Hiraoka, T., Masui, J. and Nishikawa, S. (2010), “Behavioral adaptation to advanced driver-assistance systems”, Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference, pp. 930-935.
Jansson, J., Sandin, J., Augusto, B., Fischer, M., Blissing, B. and Källgren, L. (2014), “Design and performance of the VTI sim IV”, Driving simulation conference, pp. 128-138.
Louw, T., Goncalves, R., Torrao, G., Radhakrishnan, V., Lyu, W., Guillen, P.P. and Merat, N. (2020), “Do drivers change their manual car-following behaviour after automated car-following?”, Cognition, Technology & Work, pp. 1-15.
Morando, M.M., Tian, Q., Truong, L.T. and Vu, H.L. (2018), “Studying the safety impact of autonomous vehicles using Simulation-Based surrogate safety measures”, Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/6135183.
Ngoduy, D. (2015), “Effect of the car-following combinations on the instability of heterogeneous traffic flow”, Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 44-58, doi: 10.1080/21680566.2014.960503.
Sibi, S., Balters, S., Fu, E., Strack, E.G., Steinert, M. and Ju, W. (2020), “Back to school: impact of training on driver behavior and state in autonomous vehicles”, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 1189-1196, doi: 10.1109/IV47402.2020.9304537.
Treiber, M., Hennecke, A. and Helbing, D. (2000), “Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations”, Physical Review E, Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 1805-1824, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1805.
Varotto, S.F., Farah, H., Bogenberger, K., van Arem, B. and Hoogendoorn, S.P. (2020), “Adaptations in driver behaviour characteristics during control transitions from full-range adaptive cruise control to manual driving: an on-road study”, Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 776-806, doi: 10.1080/23249935.2020.1720856.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence maybe seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode