Journal Home > Volume 4 , Issue 2
Purpose

Efficient traffic incident management is needed to alleviate the negative impact of traffic incidents. Accurate and reliable estimation of traffic incident duration is of great importance for traffic incident management. Previous studies have proposed models for traffic incident duration prediction; however, most of these studies focus on the total duration and could not update prediction results in real-time. From a traveler’s perspective, the relevant factor is the residual duration of the impact of the traffic incident. Besides, few (if any) studies have used dynamic traffic flow parameters in the prediction models. This paper aims to propose a framework to fill these gaps.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper proposes a framework based on the multi-layer perception (MLP) and long short-term memory (LSTM) model. The proposed methodology integrates traffic incident-related factors and real-time traffic flow parameters to predict the residual traffic incident duration. To validate the effectiveness of the framework, traffic incident data and traffic flow data from Shanghai Zhonghuan Expressway are used for modeling training and testing.

Findings

Results show that the model with 30-min time window and taking both traffic volume and speed as inputs performed best. The area under the curve values exceed 0.85 and the prediction accuracies exceed 0.75. These indicators demonstrated that the model is appropriate for this study context. The model provides new insights into traffic incident duration prediction.

Research limitations/implications

The incident samples applied by this study might not be enough and the variables are not abundant. The number of injuries and casualties, more detailed description of the incident location and other variables are expected to be used to characterize the traffic incident comprehensively. The framework needs to be further validated through a sufficiently large number of variables and locations.

Practical implications

The framework can help reduce the impacts of incidents on the safety of efficiency of road traffic once implemented in intelligent transport system and traffic management systems in future practical applications.

Originality/value

This study uses two artificial neural network methods, MLP and LSTM, to establish a framework aiming at providing accurate and time-efficient information on traffic incident duration in the future for transportation operators and travelers. This study will contribute to the deployment of emergency management and urban traffic navigation planning.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Dynamic prediction of traffic incident duration on urban expressways: a deep learning approach based on LSTM and MLP

Show Author's information Weiwei Zhu1Jinglin Wu2Ting Fu3( )Junhua Wang3Jie Zhang3Qiangqiang Shangguan3
Shanghai Municipal Road Transport Development Center, Shanghai, China
Institute of Urban Risk Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Purpose

Efficient traffic incident management is needed to alleviate the negative impact of traffic incidents. Accurate and reliable estimation of traffic incident duration is of great importance for traffic incident management. Previous studies have proposed models for traffic incident duration prediction; however, most of these studies focus on the total duration and could not update prediction results in real-time. From a traveler’s perspective, the relevant factor is the residual duration of the impact of the traffic incident. Besides, few (if any) studies have used dynamic traffic flow parameters in the prediction models. This paper aims to propose a framework to fill these gaps.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper proposes a framework based on the multi-layer perception (MLP) and long short-term memory (LSTM) model. The proposed methodology integrates traffic incident-related factors and real-time traffic flow parameters to predict the residual traffic incident duration. To validate the effectiveness of the framework, traffic incident data and traffic flow data from Shanghai Zhonghuan Expressway are used for modeling training and testing.

Findings

Results show that the model with 30-min time window and taking both traffic volume and speed as inputs performed best. The area under the curve values exceed 0.85 and the prediction accuracies exceed 0.75. These indicators demonstrated that the model is appropriate for this study context. The model provides new insights into traffic incident duration prediction.

Research limitations/implications

The incident samples applied by this study might not be enough and the variables are not abundant. The number of injuries and casualties, more detailed description of the incident location and other variables are expected to be used to characterize the traffic incident comprehensively. The framework needs to be further validated through a sufficiently large number of variables and locations.

Practical implications

The framework can help reduce the impacts of incidents on the safety of efficiency of road traffic once implemented in intelligent transport system and traffic management systems in future practical applications.

Originality/value

This study uses two artificial neural network methods, MLP and LSTM, to establish a framework aiming at providing accurate and time-efficient information on traffic incident duration in the future for transportation operators and travelers. This study will contribute to the deployment of emergency management and urban traffic navigation planning.

Keywords: Deep learning, Long short-term memory, Prediction of traffic incident duration, Multi-layer perception

References(37)

Abouaï ssa, H., Fliess, M. and Join, C. (2016), “On short-term traffic flow forecasting and its reliability”, IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol. 49 No. 12, pp. 111-116.

Adler, M.W., van Ommeren, J. and Rietveld, P. (2013), “Road congestion and incident duration”, Economics of Transportation, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 109-118.

Highway Capacity Manual (2010), Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

Chung, Y. (2010), “Development of an accident duration prediction model on the Korean freeway systems”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 282-289.

Cong, H., Chen, C., Lin, P.S., Zhang, G., Milton, J. and Zhi, Y. (2018), “Traffic incident duration estimation based on a dual-learning Bayesian network model”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2672 No. 45, pp. 196-209.

Dimitriou, L. and Vlahogianni, E.I. (2015), “Fuzzy modeling of freeway accident duration with rainfall and traffic flow interactions”, Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vols 5/6, pp. 59-71.

Fang, SE., Xie, W., Wang, J. and Ragland, D.R. (2016), “Utilizing the eigenvectors of freeway loop data spatiotemporal schematic for real time crash prediction”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 94, pp. 59-64.

Farradyne, P. (2000), Traffic Incident Management Handbook, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Travel Management.

Ghosh, I., Savolainen, P.T. and Gates, T. (2014), “Examination of factors affecting freeway incident clearance times: a comparison of the generalized F model and several alternative nested models”, Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 48 No. 6, pp. 471-485.

Gu, Y., Lu, W., Qin, L., Li, M. and Shao, Z. (2019), “Short-term prediction of lane-level traffic speeds: a fusion deep learning model”, Transportation Research Part C: emerging Technologies, Vol. 106, pp. 1-16.

Haule, H.J., Sando, T., Lentz, R., Chuan, C.H. and Alluri, P. (2019), “Evaluating the impact and clearance duration of freeway incidents”, International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 13-24.

Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J. (1997), “Long short-term memory”, Neural Computation, Vol. 9 No. 8, pp. 1735-1780.

Hojati, A.T., Ferreira, L., Washington, S. and Charles, P. (2013), “Hazard based models for freeway traffic incident duration”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 52, pp. 171-181.

Hojati, A.T., Ferreira, L., Washington, S., Charles, P. and Shobeirinejad, A. (2014), “Modelling total duration of traffic incidents including incident detection and recovery time”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 71, pp. 296-305.

Hojati, A.T., Ferreira, L., Washington, S., Charles, P. and Shobeirinejad, A. (2016), “Modelling the impact of traffic incidents on travel time reliability”, Transportation Research Part C: emerging Technologies, Vol. 70, pp. 86-97.

Kay, R. and Kinnersley, N. (2002), “On the use of the accelerated failure time model as an alternative to the proportional hazards model in the treatment of time to event data: a case study in influenza”, Drug Information Journal, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 571-579.

Lee, Y., Wei, C.H. and Chao, K.C. (2017), “Non-parametric machine learning methods for evaluating the effects of traffic accident duration on freeways”, Archives of Transport, Vol. 43 No. 3.

Li, R., Guo, M. and Lu, H. (2017), “Analysis of the different duration stages of accidents with hazard-based model”, International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 7-16.

Li, R., Pereira, F.C. and Ben-Akiva, M.E. (2015), “Competing risks mixture model for traffic incident duration prediction”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 75, pp. 192-201.

Lin, L., Wang, Q. and Sadek, A.W. (2016), “A combined M5P tree and hazard-based duration model for predicting urban freeway traffic accident durations”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 91, pp. 114-126.

Liu, Y., Liu, Z. and Jia, R. (2019), “DeepPF: a deep learning based architecture for metro passenger flow prediction”, Transportation Research Part C: emerging Technologies, Vol. 101, pp. 18-34.

Ma, X., Tao, Z., Wang, Y., Yu, H. and Wang, Y. (2015), “Long short-term memory neural network for traffic speed prediction using remote microwave sensor data”, Transportation Research Part C: emerging Technologies, Vol. 54, pp. 187-197.

Ma, X., Ding, C., Luan, S., Wang, Y. and Wang, Y. (2017), “Prioritizing influential factors for freeway incident clearance time prediction using the gradient boosting decision trees method”, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 18 No. 9, pp. 2303-2310.

Oh, J.S., Oh, C., Ritchie, S.G. and Chang, M. (2005), “Real-time estimation of accident likelihood for safety enhancement”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131 No. 5, pp. 358-363.

Ozbay, K. and Noyan, N. (2006), “Estimation of incident clearance times using Bayesian networks approach”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 542-555.

Polson, N.G. and Sokolov, V.O. (2017), “Deep learning for short-term traffic flow prediction”, Transportation Research Part C: emerging Technologies, Vol. 79, pp. 1-17.

Ru, C., Feng, M., Li, J. and Yu, H. (2017), “Incident duration predication based on traffic boardcasting information”, in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) and IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC), IEEE, pp. 804-807.

Skabardonis, A., Varaiya, P. and Petty, K.F. (2003), “Measuring recurrent and nonrecurrent traffic congestion”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1856 No. 1, pp. 118-124.

Song, X., Liu, Y., Xue, L., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Wang, J., Jiang, L. and Cheng, Z. (2020), “Time-series well performance prediction based on long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network model”, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 186, p. 106682.

Su, J., Zhang, X., Lin, Q., Qin, Y., Yao, J. and Liu, Y. (2019), “Exploiting reverse target-side contexts for neural machine translation via asynchronous bidirectional decoding”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 277, p. 103168.

Tang, J., Zheng, L., Han, C., Yin, W., Zhang, Y., Zou, Y. and Huang, H. (2020), “Statistical and machine-learning methods for clearance time prediction of road incidents: a methodology review”, Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 27, p. 100123.

Wang, J., Liu, B., Fu, T., Liu, S. and Stipancic, J. (2019), “Modeling when and where a secondary accident occurs”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 130, pp. 160-166.

Weng, J., Feng, L., Du, G. and Xiong, H. (2019), “Maximum likelihood regression tree with two-variable splitting scheme for subway incident delay”, Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 1061-1080.

Weng, J., Qiao, W., Qu, X. and Yan, X. (2015), “Cluster-based lognormal distribution model for accident duration”, Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 345-363.

Zhang, J., Junhua, W. and Shou’en, F. (2019), “Prediction of urban expressway total traffic accident duration based on multiple linear regression and artificial neural network”, in 2019 5th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS), IEEE, pp. 503-510.
DOI

Zou, Y., Ye, X., Henrickson, K., Tang, J. and Wang, Y. (2018), “Jointly analyzing freeway traffic incident clearance and response time using a copula-based approach”, Transportation Research Part C: emerging Technologies, Vol. 86, pp. 171-182.

Zou, Y., Lin, B., Yang, X., Wu, L., Muneeb Abid, M. and Tang, J. (2021), “Application of the bayesian model averaging in analyzing freeway traffic incident clearance time for emergency management”, Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2021.

Publication history
Copyright
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 21 March 2021
Revised: 06 July 2021
Accepted: 10 July 2021
Published: 25 August 2021
Issue date: September 2021

Copyright

© 2021 Weiwei Zhu, Jinglin Wu, Ting Fu, Junhua Wang, Jie Zhang and Qiangqiang Shangguan. Published in Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence maybe seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Return