567
Views
52
Downloads
4
Crossref
N/A
WoS
1
Scopus
N/A
CSCD
Time headway (THW) is an essential parameter in traffic safety and is used as a typical control variable by many vehicle control algorithms, especially in safety-critical ADAS and automated driving systems. However, due to the randomness of human drivers, THW cannot be accurately represented, affecting scholars’ more profound research.
In this work, two data sets are used as the experimental data to calculate the goodness-of-fit of 18 commonly used distribution models of THW to select the best distribution model. Subsequently, the characteristic parameters of traffic flow are extracted from the data set, and three variables with higher importance are extracted using the random forest model. Combining the best distribution model parameters of the data set, this study obtained a distribution model with adaptive parameters, and its performance and applicability are verified.
In this work, two data sets are used as the experimental data to calculate the goodness-of-fit of 18 commonly used distribution models of THW to select the best distribution model. Subsequently, the characteristic parameters of traffic flow are extracted from the data set, and three variables with higher importance are extracted using the random forest model. Combining the best distribution model parameters of the data set, this study obtained a distribution model with adaptive parameters, and its performance and applicability are verified.
The results show that the proposed model has a 62.7% performance improvement over the distribution model with fixed parameters. Moreover, the parameter function of the distribution model can be regarded as a quantitative analysis of the degree of influence of the traffic flow state on THW.
Time headway (THW) is an essential parameter in traffic safety and is used as a typical control variable by many vehicle control algorithms, especially in safety-critical ADAS and automated driving systems. However, due to the randomness of human drivers, THW cannot be accurately represented, affecting scholars’ more profound research.
In this work, two data sets are used as the experimental data to calculate the goodness-of-fit of 18 commonly used distribution models of THW to select the best distribution model. Subsequently, the characteristic parameters of traffic flow are extracted from the data set, and three variables with higher importance are extracted using the random forest model. Combining the best distribution model parameters of the data set, this study obtained a distribution model with adaptive parameters, and its performance and applicability are verified.
In this work, two data sets are used as the experimental data to calculate the goodness-of-fit of 18 commonly used distribution models of THW to select the best distribution model. Subsequently, the characteristic parameters of traffic flow are extracted from the data set, and three variables with higher importance are extracted using the random forest model. Combining the best distribution model parameters of the data set, this study obtained a distribution model with adaptive parameters, and its performance and applicability are verified.
The results show that the proposed model has a 62.7% performance improvement over the distribution model with fixed parameters. Moreover, the parameter function of the distribution model can be regarded as a quantitative analysis of the degree of influence of the traffic flow state on THW.
Biswas, R.K., et al. (2021), “A systematic review of definitions of motor vehicle headways in driver behaviour and performance studies”, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 77, pp. 38-54, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.12.011.
Buckley, D.J. (1968), “A Semi-Poisson model of traffic flow”, Transportation Science, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 107-133, doi: 10.1287/trsc.2.2.107.
Chen, J., et al. (2021), “Connected automated vehicle platoon control with input saturation and variable time headway strategy”, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 4929-4940, doi: 10.1109/tits.2020.2983468.
Cowan, R.J. (1975), “Useful headway models”, Transportation Research, Vol. 9 No. 6, pp. 371-375, doi: 10.1016/0041-1647(75)90008-8.
Griffiths, J.D. and Hunt, J.G. (1991), “Vehicle headways in urban areas”, Traffic Eng. Control, Vol. 32 No. 10, pp. 458-462.
Krajewski, R., et al. (2018), “The HIGHD dataset: a drone dataset of naturalistic vehicle trajectories on german highways for validation of highly automated driving systems”, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), doi: 10.1109/itsc.2018.8569552.
Li, L. and Chen, X. (Michael) (2017), “Vehicle headway modeling and its inferences in macroscopic/microscopic traffic flow theory: a survey”, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 76, pp. 170-188, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.007.
Mannering, F.L., et al. (2016), “UNOBSERVED heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data”, Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 11, pp. 1-16, doi: 10.1016/j.amar.2016.04.001.
Mao, J., et al. (2021), “Adaptive cruise control system based on improved variable time headway spacing strategy”, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 1471-1479, doi: 10.3233/jifs-202107.
Mei, M. and Bullen, A.G.R. (1993), “Lognormal distribution for high traffic flows”, Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1398, pp. 125-128.
Montanino, M. and Punzo, V. (2015), “Trajectory data reconstruction and simulation-based validation against macroscopic traffic patterns”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 80, pp. 82-106, doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.06.010.
Punzo, V., et al. (2011), “On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the next generation simulation (NGSIM) program data”, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 1243-1262, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.007.
Shangguan, Q., et al. (2021), “An integrated methodology for real-time driving risk status prediction using naturalistic driving data”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 156, p. 106122, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106122.
Sun, D. and Benekohal, R.F. (2005), “Analysis of work zone gaps and rear-end collision probability”, Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 8 No. 2, p. 71.
Taylor, M.A. (2017), “FOSGERAU’s travel time reliability ratio and the burr distribution”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 97, pp. 50-63, doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.12.001.
Tolle, J.E. (1976), “Vehicular headway distributions: testing and results”, Transportation Research Record, Vol. 567, pp. 56-64.
Wasielewski, P. (1979), “Car-following headways on freeways interpreted by the semi-Poisson headway distribution model”, Transportation Science, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 36-55.
Weng, J., et al. (2013), “Vehicle headway distribution in work zones”, Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 285-303, doi: 10.1080/23249935.2012.762564.
Ye, F. and Zhang, Y. (2009), “Vehicle type–specific headway analysis using freeway traffic data”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2124 No. 1, pp. 222-230.
Yu, R. and Abdel-Aty, M. (2013), “Multi-level Bayesian analyses for single- and multi-vehicle freeway crashes”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 58, pp. 97-105, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.025.
Zhu, M., et al. (2020), “Impact on car following behavior of a forward collision warning system with headway monitoring”, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 111, pp. 226-244, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.015.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence maybe seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode