AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (9.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Feasibility of underground gas storage construction from large-scale low-permeability lithologic gas reservoirs: Insights into microscopic storage spaces

Zhen-Hua Tiana,b( )Yong Xiaa,bJian-Guo Zhanga,bDe-Long Wanga,bZhi-Jun Liua,bChen-Yang Zhaoa,bYu-Xuan XiacJun-Wei SudDeng-Ke LiudJian-Chao Caic ( )
Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an, 710018, Shaanxi, China
National Engineering Laboratory for Exploration and Development of Low-permeability Oil & Gas Fields, Xi'an, 710018, Shaanxi, China
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
School of Human Settlement and Civil Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China

Peer review under the responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing).

Edited by Min Li

Show Author Information

Abstract

The construction of underground gas storage (UGS) in a large-scale low-permeability lithologic gas reservoir presents an immense engineering challenge. Under the context of UGS, research on structural characteristics and storage capacity at the microscopic scale is insufficient, making it difficult to provide effective support for the engineering scheme. In this study, the microscopic storage spaces of a typical lithologic gas reservoir (i.e., YL block in the Ordos Basin) are comprehensively analyzed through experimental techniques (represented by computed tomography scanning), digital core analysis, and fractal analysis. Furthermore, the feasibility of UGS construction is examined. The results demonstrate that the large-scale low-permeability lithologic gas reservoir exhibits significant zonal heterogeneity in its microscopic structural characteristics at both morphological and statistical levels. Specifically, the microscopic storage spaces of the core zone within the YL block are notably higher than those in the transition and periphery zones, characterized by larger aperture, less tortuous, higher aggregation and connectivity. Consequently, the core zone provides adequate storage capacity and injection-extraction capability for large-scale underground storage of natural gas. In contrast, the transition and periphery zones exhibit inferior microstructural, storage, and flow properties, which are not suitable for rapid injection and production. However, these zones show a fairly strong lateral sealing capability, which can be utilized as a monitoring area to evaluate UGS integrity. These findings indicate that the reservoir's microstructural features meet the essential requirements of storage capacity, injection-extraction capability, and lateral sealing property for UGS construction. Based on this understanding, a series of zone-differentiated UGS engineering suggestions are proposed, including zonal function specification, well type selection, well deployment scheme, and management of old wells. These findings can provide valuable insights for the assessment and implementation of UGS projects from such gas reservoirs.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 1606-1623

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Tian Z-H, Xia Y, Zhang J-G, et al. Feasibility of underground gas storage construction from large-scale low-permeability lithologic gas reservoirs: Insights into microscopic storage spaces. Petroleum Science, 2026, 23(3): 1606-1623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2026.02.013

158

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 04 July 2025
Revised: 11 January 2026
Accepted: 10 February 2026
Published: 13 February 2026
© 2026 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).