AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Has the Belt and Road Initiative reshaped the ecological sustainability of Eurasia: A perspective of three-dimensional ecological footprint

Nan Yua,bTianming ShaocRenjin Sunb( )Chunming Xua( )
College of Energy Innovation, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China

Peer review under the responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing).

Edited by Min Li

Show Author Information

Abstract

At present, environmental problems are becoming increasingly severe, and sustainable development concerns the common destiny of all mankind around the world. Leveraging ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity data for Eurasia from 2000 to 2022, this study employs a three-dimensional ecological footprint model to conduct a multi-scale sustainability assessment. Further applying a difference-in-differences model, we analyze the impact mechanisms of the Belt and Road Initiative on Eurasia's ecological footprint. Quantile regression and heterogeneity analysis reveal Belt and Road Initiative's differential effects across countries. Key findings indicate that: (1) Eurasia's unsustainable development intensified from 2000 to 2022, with ecological footprint depth rising from 1.966 to 2.513 ha/cap, while per capita ecological footprint size declined slightly from 1.092 to 1.023 ha/cap. (2) Classifying 83 countries into 9 sustainability types based on ecological footprint depth and size, Asia showed weak sustainability (low size-medium depth and low size-low depth types), while Europe was primarily low size-medium depth with relatively stronger sustainability. Six countries experienced weakened sustainability and six improved. (3) The Belt and Road Initiative significantly increased ecological footprint in Eurasian countries, mediated by industrial structure, technological innovation, and foreign direct investment. Quantile regression indicates Belt and Road Initiative's effect is stronger in nations with lower initial ecological footprint. Heterogeneity analysis further shows Belt and Road Initiative disproportionately impacts countries with lower ecological footprint depth, smaller per capita ecological footprint size, and weaker sustainability. These insights provide critical guidance for implementing the UN 2030 Agenda and formulating Belt and Road Initiative policies to enhance long-term sustainability.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 1553-1571

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Yu N, Shao T, Sun R, et al. Has the Belt and Road Initiative reshaped the ecological sustainability of Eurasia: A perspective of three-dimensional ecological footprint. Petroleum Science, 2026, 23(3): 1553-1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2025.10.026

152

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 13 April 2025
Revised: 04 July 2025
Accepted: 26 October 2025
Published: 29 November 2025
© 2026

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).