AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (6.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

CO2-EOR microscopic mechanism under injection–production coupling technology in low-permeability reservoirs

Zheng Chena,b, Yu-Liang Sua,b ( ), Lei Lia,b, Yong-Mao Haoa,b, Wen-Dong Wanga,b, Chui-Xian Kongc
Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Gas Development (China University of Petroleum (East China)), Ministry of Education, Qingdao, 266580, Shandong, PR China
School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, Shandong, PR China
Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, 834000, Xinjiang, PR China

Edited by Yan-Hua Sun

Show Author Information

Abstract

Injection–production coupling (IPC) technology holds substantial potential for boosting oil recovery and enhancing economic efficiency. Despite this potential, discussion on gas injection coupling, especially in relation to microscopic mechanisms, remains relatively sparse. This study utilizes microscopic visualization experiments to investigate the mechanisms of residual oil mobilization under various IPC scenarios, complemented by mechanical analysis at different stages. The research quantitatively assesses the degree of microscopic oil recovery and the distribution of residual oil across different injection–production methods. Findings reveal that during the initial phase of continuous gas injection (CGI), the process closely mimics miscible displacement, gradually transitioning to immiscible displacement as CO2 extraction progresses. Compared to CGI, the asynchronous injection–production (AIP) method improved the microscopic oil recovery rate by 6.58%. This enhancement is mainly attributed to significant variations in the pressure field in the AIP method, which facilitate the mobilization of columnar and porous residual oil. Furthermore, the synchronous cycle injection (SCI) method increased microscopic oil recovery by 13.77% and 7.19% compared to CGI and AIP, respectively. In the SCI method, membrane oil displays filamentary and Kármán vortex street flow patterns. The dissolved and expanded crude oil tends to accumulate and grow at the oil–solid interface due to adhesive forces, thereby reducing migration resistance. The study findings provide a theoretical foundation for improving oil recovery in low-permeability reservoirs.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 739-755

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Chen Z, Su Y-L, Li L, et al. CO2-EOR microscopic mechanism under injection–production coupling technology in low-permeability reservoirs. Petroleum Science, 2025, 22(2): 739-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2024.11.003

1080

Views

13

Downloads

10

Crossref

10

Web of Science

11

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 15 May 2024
Revised: 02 November 2024
Accepted: 06 November 2024
Published: 07 November 2024
© 2024 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).