AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Research | Open Access

Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of argatroban and alteplase treatment regimens for acute cerebral infarction

Chengde Medical University, Chengde 067000, Hebei, China
Department of Neurology, 981 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Chengde 067000, Hebei, China
Hebei Key Laboratory of Nerve Injury and Repair, Chengde 067000, Hebei, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

This study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of argatroban and alteplase in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction.

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed 131 patients admitted for acute cerebral infarction within 48 h of onset from 1 December 2018 to 1 May 2021. The patients were divided according to treatment (i.e., the argatroban and alteplase groups). The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (before treatment, at 24 h, and at 3, 7, and 14 days), 14-day response rate, 3-month modified Rankin Scale score (mRS), activities of daily living (ADL) score, prognosis, and adverse events during treatment were compared.

Results

Sixty-two and 69 patients were enrolled in the alteplase and argatroban groups, respectively, and both had comparable baseline data. The NIHSS scores of the alteplase group decreased significantly before and after treatment (24 h and at 3, 7, and 14 days), whereas those of the alteplase group decreased most rapidly after 24 h of administration. The argatroban group showed no significant changes in NIHSS score in the first 7 days after treatment until day 14, at which it significantly decreased. Statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed in four points (P < 0.05). The 14-day effectivity rate of alteplase was significantly higher than that of argatroban (83.8% vs. 65.2%; χ2 = 131; P = 0.001). The 3-month mRS, ADL and pre-treatment comparisons were statistically significant in the two groups (P < 0.05), while the inter-group comparison was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the outcomes at 3 months after treatment in both groups did not vary significantly (alteplase vs. argatroban: 48/62 vs. 51/69; χ2 = 0.217; P = 0.641). Adverse events during treatment included gingival bleeding (two patients), positive fecal occult blood (two patients), and minor intracranial blood ooze (one patient) in the alteplase group, whereas no adverse events (e.g., bleeding and shock) were noted in the argatroban group.

Conclusion

The short-term efficacy of argatroban in improving neurological function in patients with acute cerebral infarction was significantly lower than that of alteplase. However, the long-term efficacy at 3 months of treatment was comparably significant to that of alteplase with fewer adverse events.

References

[1]

Zhou MG, Wang HD, Zeng XY, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;394(10204): 1145-1158.

[2]

National Health Commission of People's Republic of China. China Health Statistics Yearbook 2021 (in Chinese). Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2021: 280-281.

[3]

GBD Mortality, Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385(9963): 117-171.

[4]

Guo XL, Xue Q, Zhao JH, et al. Clinical diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines of stroke neurorestoration (2020 China version). J Neurorestoratol. 2020;8(4): 241-251.

[5]

Khandelwal P, Yavagal DR, Sacco RL. Acute ischemic stroke intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(22): 2631-2644.

[6]

Chinese Society of Neurology, Chinese Stroke Society. Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2018 (in Chinese). Chin J Neurol. 2018;51(9): 666-682.

[7]
The scoring standard of clinical neurological deficit in stroke patients (1995) (in Chinese). Chin J Neurol. 1996;(6): 381-383.
[8]

Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;384(9958): 1929-1935.

[9]

van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, et al. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19(5): 604-607.

[10]

Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Dávalos A, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet. 2007;369(9558): 275-282.

[11]

Ouyang Q. Effects of argatroban combined with alteplase on hemodynamics and serum levels of brain natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein and homocysteine in patients with acute cerebral infarction (in Chinese). Guangxi Med J. 2017;39(5): 645-648.

[12]

Zhong GX, Wang W. Clinical definition of cerebral infarction penumbra (in Chinese). J Inter Neurol Neurosurg. 2004;11(4): 335-337.

[13]

Geng T. Analysis of clinical efficacy and safety of alteplase in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction (in Chinese). Chin Pract Med. 2018;13(15): 105-107.

[14]

Zhang TP. Clinical efficacy, bleeding and safety observation of alteplase thrombolysis in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction (in Chinese). Guide Chin Med. 2020;18(6): 51-52.

[15]

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24): 1581-1587.

[16]

Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019;50(12): e440-e441.

[17]

ChenB, Friedman B, Whitney MA, et al. Thrombin activity associatedwithneuronal damage during acute focal ischemia. J Neurosci. 2012;32(22): 7622-7631.

[18]

Yao GL. The curative effect observation and adverse reactions of argatroban combined with cerebral protective agent in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (in Chinese). Chin J Prev Contr Chron Dis. 2016;24(1): 63-64.

[19]

Zhang L, Cheng L, Liu GH, et al. Effect of argatroban on vascular endothelial function, Hcy and inflammatory state for acute cerebral infarction (in Chinese). Chin J Pract Neurol Dis. 2017;20(8): 17-19.

[20]

Escolar G, Bozzo J, Maragall S. Argatroban: a direct thrombin inhibitor with reliable and predictable anticoagulant actions. Drugs Today. 2006;42(4): 223-236.

[21]

Hacke W, Donnan G, Fieschi C, et al. Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet. 2004;363(9411): 768-774.

[22]

Chen SM, Cai DC, Huang PC, et al. Early and long-term outcomes of argatroban use in patients with acute noncardioembolic stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020;198: 106233.

[23]

Hoxie JA, Ahuja M, Belmonte E, et al. Internalization and recycling of activated thrombin receptors. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(18): 13756-13763.

[24]

Liu M, Liu J, Zhu YM, et al. Effect of argatroban on brain neuronal apoptosis in rats with acute cerebral infarction (in Chinese). Chin J Cell Stem Cell (Electronic Edition). 2020;10(1): 37-43.

[25]

Hou XJ, Jin CF, Pan CL, et al. Effects of argatroban therapy for stroke patients: a meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;90: 225-232.

Journal of Neurorestoratology
Article number: 100017
Cite this article:
Xu L, Yang X, Gao H, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of argatroban and alteplase treatment regimens for acute cerebral infarction. Journal of Neurorestoratology, 2022, 10(3): 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnrt.2022.100017

594

Views

1

Crossref

2

Web of Science

3

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 06 April 2022
Revised: 26 July 2022
Published: 18 August 2022
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return