AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline

Multi-nutrient fertilization-based analysis of fruit quality and mineral element composition during fruit development in Merlot wine grapevines

Xiaolong Wang1,2Xuedong Shao3Zhengwen Zhang3Xiaomin Zhong3Xiaohao Ji1,2Xiangbin Shi1,2Chang Liu1,2Zhiqiang Wang1,2Fengzhi Liu1,2Haibo Wang1,2( )
Key Laboratory of Germplasm Resources Utilization of Horticultural Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xingcheng 125100, China
Key Laboratory of Mineral Nutrition and Fertilizers Efficient Utilization of Deciduous Fruit Tree of Liaoning Province, Xingcheng 125100, China
Junding Winery Co., Ltd., Penglai 265600, China
Show Author Information

Highlights

  • The mineral elements of different tissues and growth stages were simultaneously used as nutritional diagnostic factors for specific fruit quality.

  • Based on 5-4-16 formula fertilization scheme, the precise fertilization rate and ratio can be achieved for specific fruit quality.

Abstract

Mineral elements play a crucial role in plant growth and development. Ensuring the proper supply of these elements in the soil to maintain the optimum range within plants is necessary for achieving optimal fruit yield and quality. Unfortunately, the application of NPKCaMg fertilizers to fruit trees is often either insufficient or excessive, leading to environmental degradation and reduced fruit yield and quality. To assess the impacts of different fertilizers on the biological traits of grapes and their responses to nutritional elements, Merlot grapevines were subjected to multi-nutrient fertilization over four consecutive growing seasons from 2018 to 2021 in Penglai District, Yantai, China. Principal component analysis revealed that the T11 treatment, consisting of N3P3K1Ca2Mg4, was the most suitable fertilizer type and application design among the treatments. The application of T11 resulted in a significantly lower (24.29–35.20%) fertilizer usage, and it resulted in increases in several important traits such as 100-grain weight (HGW), number of seeds (SN), total soluble solids (TSS), total seed phenols (SP), seed flavanols (SFI), and seed tannins (ST) by 3.28–12.84%, 3.76–20.03%, 1.11–14.95%, 2.16–23.69%, 11.00–32.78%, and 1.07–23.35%, respectively, compared to the T14 (N4P2K3Ca1Mg4), T16 (N4P4K1Ca3Mg2), T13 (N4P1K4Ca2Mg3), and T15 (N4P3K2Ca4Mg1) treatments. Flowering and fruiting processes exhibited a considerable demand for NPK, with higher requirements for K and B during fruit growth and development compared to the other macroelements and micronutrients, respectively. Excessive K in soil enhanced the competitive inhibition of Ca uptake by Merlot grapevines. The optimal ranges of mineral element contents for total peel phenols (PP), peel flavanols (PFI), total peel flavonoids (PFD), total seed phenols (SP), and seed tannins (ST) were primarily influenced by grape variety and nutritional analysis method. In conclusion, the careful selection of NPKCaMg fertilizer and its precise application to soil at an optimum range of mineral elements is critical for grapevine growth and development.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA)
Pages 1503-1514

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wang X, Shao X, Zhang Z, et al. Multi-nutrient fertilization-based analysis of fruit quality and mineral element composition during fruit development in Merlot wine grapevines. Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA), 2025, 24(4): 1503-1514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2024.04.032

875

Views

10

Downloads

10

Crossref

8

Web of Science

8

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 06 November 2023
Accepted: 22 March 2024
Published: 20 April 2025
© 2025, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS). All rights reserved.