AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home iLIVER Article
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a surgeon's perspective

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan
Show Author Information

Abstract

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is defined anatomically as tumors located in the extrahepatic biliary tree proximal to the origin of the cystic duct. However, as the boundary between the extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile ducts is not well defined, PHC potentially includes two types of tumors: one is the extrahepatic type, which arises from the large hilar bile duct, and the other is the intrahepatic type, which has an intrahepatic component with invasion of the hepatic hilus. The new American Joint Commission on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system for PHC was well revised; an important revision is that the Bismuth type IV was removed from T4 stage determinants. Most patients with PHC present with obstructive jaundice, and preoperative biliary drainage is mandatory. Previously, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was used in many centers; however, it has been accepted that endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is the most suitable method for PHC. Recently, inside-stents have also been adopted for biliary drainage, with favorable results. Portal vein embolization is widely performed as presurgical treatment for patients undergoing extended hepatectomy to minimize postoperative liver dysfunction. Surgical resection of PHC is technically demanding and continues to be the most difficult challenge for hepatobiliary surgeons. Because of advances in diagnostic and surgical techniques, surgical outcomes and survival rates after resection have steadily improved. However, survival rates, especially for patients with lymph node metastasis, are unsatisfactory, and establishing a protocol for effective adjuvant chemotherapy is an urgent task. Further synergy of endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and surgeons is required to conquer this intractable disease.

References

[1]
International Union Against Cancer (UICC). TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2009.
[2]

DeOliveira ML, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: thirtyone-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann. Surg. 2007;245: 755-62.

[3]

Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Sohn TA, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: a spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumor. Ann. Surg. 1996;224: 463-73.

[4]

Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein WO, et al. Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 1999;230: 808-18.

[5]

Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, et al. Staging, respectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2001;234: 507-19.

[6]

Seyama Y, Kubota K, Sano K, et al. Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann. Surg. 2003;238: 73-83.

[7]

Kawasaki S, Imamura H, Kobayashi A, et al. Results of surgical resection for patients with hilar bile duct cancer: application of extended hepatectomy after biliary drainage and hemihepatic portal vein embolization. Ann. Surg. 2003;238: 84-92.

[8]

Hemming AW, Reed AI, Fujita S, et al. Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2005;241: 693-702.

[9]

Sano T, Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, et al. One hundred two consecutive hepatobiliary resections for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with zero mortality. Ann. Surg. 2006; 244: 240-7.

[10]

Miyazaki M, Kato A, Ito H, et al. Combined vascular resection in operative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does it work or not? Surgery 2007;141: 581-8.

[11]

Lee SG, Song GW, Hwang S, et al. Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era; the Asan experiences. J. Hepatob. Pancreat. Surg. 2010;17: 476-89.

[12]

van Gulik TM, Kloek JJ, Ruys AT, et al. Multidisciplinary management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor): extended resection is associated with improved survival. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2011;37: 65-71.

[13]

Young AL, Igami T, Senda Y, et al. Evolution of the surgical management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in a Western center demonstrates improved survival with endoscopic biliary drainage and reduced use of blood transfusion. HPB 2011; 13: 483-93.

[14]

Saxena A, Chua T, Chu F, et al. Improved outcomes after aggressive surgical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a critical analysis of recurrence and survival. Am. J. Surg. 2011;202: 310-20.

[15]

Cannon R, Brock G, Buell JF. Surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: experience improves resectability. HPB 2012;14: 142-9.

[16]

Matsuyama R, Mori R, Ota Y, et al. Significance of vascular resection and reconstruction in surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: with special reference to hepatic arterial resection and reconstruction. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2016;23(Suppl 4): 475-84.

[17]

Molina V, Sampson J, Ferrer J, et al. Surgical treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: early results of en bloc portal vein resection. Langen. Arch. Surg. 2017;402: 95-104.

[18]

Higuchi R, Yazawa T, Uemura S, et al. Surgical outcomes for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with vascular invasion. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2019;23: 1443-53.

[19]

Schimizzi GV, Jin LX, Davidson JT, et al. Outcomes after vascular resection during curative-intent resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institution study from the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium. HPB 2018;20: 332-9.

[20]

Olthof PB, Aldrighetti L, Alikhanov R, et al. Portal vein embolization is associated with reduced liver failure and mortality in high-risk resections for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2021;27: 2311-8.

[21]

Sugiura T, Uesaka K, Okamura Y, et al. Major hepatectomy with combined vascular resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. BJS Open 2021;5: zrab064.

[22]

Benzing C, Krenzien F, Mieg A, et al. Tailored approach in lymph node-positive perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Langen. Arch. Surg. 2021;406: 1499-509.

[23]

Ruzzenente A, Bagante F, Olthof PB, et al. Surgery for Bismuth-Corlette type 4 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: results from a Western multicenter collaborative group. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2021;28: 7719-29.

[24]

Giuliante F, Ardito F, Aldrighetti L, et al. Liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: impact of biliary drainage failure on postoperative outcome; Results of Italian multicenter study. Surgery 2021;170: 383-9.

[25]

Nagino M. Fifty-year history of biliary surgery. Ann. Gastroenterol. Surg. 2019;3: 598-605.

[26]

Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, et al. Hepatic segmentectomy with caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. World J. Surg. 1990;14: 535-44.

[27]

Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, et al. Combined portal vein and liver resection for carcinoma of the biliary tract. Br. J. Surg. 1991;78: 727-31.

[28]

Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, et al. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for advanced carcinoma of the biliary tract. Hepato-Gastroenterol. 1991;38: 170-5.

[29]

Sakamoto E, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, et al. The pattern of infiltration at the proximal border of hilar bile duct carcinoma: a histologic analysis of 62 resected cases. Ann. Surg. 1998;227: 405-11.

[30]

Kitagawa Y, Nagino M, Kamiya J, et al. Lymph node metastasis from hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 110 patients who underwent regional and paraaortic node dissection. Ann. Surg. 2001;233: 385-92.

[31]

Ebata T, Nagino M, Kamiya J, et al. Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 52 consecutive cases. Ann. Surg. 2003;238: 720-7.

[32]

Nagino M, Kamiya J, Arai T, et al. Anatomic right hepatic trisectionectomy (extended right hepatectomy) with caudate lobectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2006;243: 28-32.

[33]

Ikeyama T, Nagino M, Oda K, et al. Surgical approach to Bismuth Type I and Ⅱ hilar cholangiocarcinomas: audit of 54 consecutive cases. Ann. Surg. 2007;246: 1052-7.

[34]

Igami T, Nagino M, Oda K, et al. Clinicopathologic study of cholangiocarcinoma with superficial spread. Ann. Surg. 2009;249: 296-302.

[35]

Nagino M, Nimura Y, Nishio H, et al. Hepatectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an audit of 50 consecutive cases. Ann. Surg. 2010;252: 115-23.

[36]

Natsume S, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Clinical significance of left trisectionectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an appraisal and comparison with left hepatectomy. Ann. Surg. 2012;255: 754-62.

[37]

Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, et al. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for cholangiocarcinoma: a single center review of 85 consecutive patients. Ann. Surg. 2012;256: 297-305.

[38]

Nagino M, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Evolution of surgical treatment for perihialr cholangiocarcinoma: a single center 34-year review of 574 consecutive resections. Ann. Surg. 2013;258: 129-40.

[39]

Tsukahara T, Ebata T, Shimoyama Y, et al. Residual carcinoma in situ at the ductal stump has a negative survival effect; an analysis of early-stage cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2017;266: 126-32.

[40]

Nagino M, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery for locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma: short- and long-term outcomes of superextended surgery. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2021;28: 376-86.

[41]

Mizuno T, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Combined vascular resection for locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2022;275: 382-90.

[42]
Nakanuma Y, Klimstra DS, Komuta M, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. WHO classification of tumors: digestive systme tumors. 5th ed. 2010. p. P254-9. Lyon.
[43]

Ebata T, Kamiya J, Nishio H, et al. The concept of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is valid. Br. J. Surg. 2009;96: 926-34.

[44]

Ebata T, Kosuge T, Hirano S, et al. Proposal to modify the International Union against Cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 2014; 101: 79-88.

[45]

Klatskin G. Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatis. Am. J. Med. 1965;38: 241-56.

[46]

Okuda K, Kubo Y, Okazaki N, et al. Clinical aspects of intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma including hilar carcinoma: a study of 57 autopsy-proven cases. Cancer 1977;39: 232-46.

[47]

Aishima S, Kuroda Y, Nishihara Y, et al. Proposal of progression model for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathologic differences between hilar type and peripheral type. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007;31: 1059-67.

[48]

Blechacz B, Komuta M, Roskams T, et al. Clinical diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011;8: 512-22.

[49]

Bismuth H, Corlette MB. Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1975;140: 170-6.

[50]

Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T. Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 1992;215: 31-8.

[51]

Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, et al. Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2001;234: 507-17.

[52]

Matsuo K, Rocha FG, Ito K, et al. The Blumgart preoperative staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of resectability and outcomes in 380 patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2012;215: 343-55.

[53]

Ebata T, Mizuno T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Predictive performance of Blumgart T staging for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in a Japanese center. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2020;27: 132-40.

[54]

Mansour JC, Aloia TA, Crane CH, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement. HPB 2015;17: 691-9.

[55]

DeOliveira ML, Schulick RD, Nimura Y, et al. New staging system and a registry for perihilar cholangiocaricnoma. Hepatology 2011;53: 1363-71.

[56]

Nagino M. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a much needed but imperfect new staging system. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011;8: 252-3.

[57]
Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
[58]

Yamada M, Mizuno T, Yamaguchi J, et al. Superiority of clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer T classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2021: 1-10. 00. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1066.

[59]

Liang B, Zhong L, He Q, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CA 19-9 in patients with cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med. Sci. Mon. 2015; 21: 3555-63.

[60]

Aljiffry M, Abdulelah A, Walsh M, et al. Evidence-based approach to cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of the current literature. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2009;208: 134-47.

[61]

Ruys AT, van Beem BE, Engelbrecht MR, et al. Radiological staging in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Radiol. 2012;85: 1255-62.

[62]

Endo I, Shimada H, Sugita M, et al. Role of three-dimensional imaging in operative planning for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 2007;142: 666-75.

[63]

Unno M, Okumoto T, Katayose Y, et al. Preoperative assessment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by multidetector row computed tomography. J. Hepatob. Pancreat. Surg. 2007;14: 434-40.

[64]

Sugiura T, Nishio H, Nagino M, et al. Value of multidetector-row computed tomography in diagnosis of portal vein invasion by perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J. Surg. 2008;32: 1478-84.

[65]

Fukami Y, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Diagnostic ability of MDCT to assess right hepatic artery invasion by perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with left-sided predominance. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2012;19: 179-86.

[66]

Senda Y, Nishio H, Oda K, et al. Value of multidetector-row CT in the assessment of longitudinal extension of cholangiocarcinoma: correlation between MDCT and microscopic findings. World J. Surg. 2009;33: 1459-67.

[67]

Noji T, Kondo S, Hirano S, et al. Computed tomography evaluation of regional lymph node metastases in patients with biliary cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2008;95: 92-6.

[68]

Vilgrain V. Staging cholangiocarcinoma by imaging studies. HPB 2008;10: 106-9.

[69]

Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V, et al. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2015;81: 168-76.

[70]

Rösch T, Hofrichter K, Frimberger E, et al. ERCP or EUS for tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures? A prospective comparative study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004;60: 390-6.

[71]

Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, et al. Preoperative diagnosis and management of thickwalled gallbladder based on bile cytology obtained by endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage tube. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2006;64: 512-9.

[72]

Weilert F, Bhat YM, Binmoeller KF, et al. EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, single-blind, comparative study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2014;80: 97-104.

[73]

Khashab MA, Fockens P, Al-Haddad MA. Utility of EUS in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures and suspected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012;76: 1024-33.

[74]

Heimbach JK, Sanchez W, Rosen CB, et al. Trans-peritoneal fine needle aspiration biopsy of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with disease dissemination. HPB 2011;13: 356-60.

[75]

Hattori M, Nagino M, Ebata T, et al. Prospective study of biliary cytology in suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 2011;98: 704-9.

[76]

Tsuchiya T, Yokoyama Y, Ebata T, et al. Randomized controlled trial on timing and number of sampling for bile aspiration cytology. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2014;21: 433-8.

[77]

Yoshioka Y, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Supraportal" right posterior hepatic artery: an anatomic trap in hepatobiliary and transplant surgery. World J. Surg. 2011;35: 1340-4.

[78]

Shimizu H, Hosokawa I, Ohtsuka M, et al. Clinical significance of anatomical variant of the left hepatic artery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma applied to rightsided hepatectomy. World J. Surg. 2014;38: 3210-4.

[79]

Radtke A, Sotiropoulos GC, Molmenti EP, et al. Computer-assisted surgery planning for complex liver resections. Ann. Surg. 2010;252: 876-83.

[80]

Mise Y, Tani K, Aoki T, et al. Virtual liver resection: computer-assisted operation planning using a three-dimensional liver representation. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2012; 20: 157-64.

[81]

Takamoto T, Hashimoto T, Ogata S, et al. Planning of anatomical liver segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy with 3-dimensional simulation software. Am. J. Surg. 2013;206: 530-8.

[82]

Sato F, Igami T, Ebata T, et al. A study of the right intersectional plane (right portal scissura) of the liver based on virtual left hepatic trisectionectomy. World J. Surg. 2014;38: 3181-5.

[83]

Nagino M. Left hepatic trisectionectomy with caudate lobectomy: demanding but essential routine surgical procedure for peri hilar cholangiocaricnoma. Ann. Surg. 2021;274: e638-40.

[84]

Sewnath ME, Karsten TM, Prins MH, et al. A meta-analysis on the efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage for tumors causing obstructive jaundice. Ann. Surg. 2002;236: 17-27.

[85]

Moole H, Bechtold M, Puli SR. Efficacy of preoperative biliary draiange in malignant obstructive jaundice: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;14: 182.

[86]

Cherqui D, Benoist S, Malassagne B, et al. Major liver resection for carcinoma in jaundiced patients without preoperative biliary draiange. Arch. Surg. 2000;135: 302-8.

[87]

Farges O, Regimbeau JM, Fuks D, et al. Multicentre European study of preoperative biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 2013;100: 274-83.

[88]

Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Ardito F, et al. Improvement in perioperative and long-term outcome after surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: results of an Italian multicenter analysis of 440 patients. Arch. Surg. 2012;147: 26-34.

[89]

Kennedy TJ, Yopp A, Qin Y, et al. Role of preoperative biliary drainage of liver remnant prior to extended liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB 2009;11: 445-51.

[90]

Wiggers JK, Groot Koerkamp B, Cieslak KP, et al. Postoperative mortality after liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: development of a risk score and importance of biliary drainage of the future liver remnant. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2016; 223: 321-31.

[91]

Nagino M, Hirano S, Yoshitomi H, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2019: the 3rd English edition. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2021;28: 26-54.

[92]

Takahashi Y, Nagino M, Nishio H, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage catheter tract recurrence in cholangiocarcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 2010;97: 1860-6.

[93]

Higuchi R, Yazawa T, Uemura S, et al. ENBD is associated with decreased tumor dissemination compared to PTBD in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2017;21: 1506-14.

[94]

Yamashita H, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Pleural dissemination of cholangiocarcinoma caused by percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage during the management of resectable cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 2019;165: 912-7.

[95]

Komaya K, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Verification of the oncologic inferiority of percutaneous biliary drainage to endoscopic drainage: a propensity score matching analysis of resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 2017;161: 394-404.

[96]

Hirano S, Tanaka E, Tsuchikawa T, et al. Oncological benefit of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2014;21: 533-40.

[97]

Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, Onodera M, et al. Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is the most suitable preoperative biliary drainage method in the management of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J. Gastroenterol. 2011;46: 242-8.

[98]

Kawakubo K, Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, et al. Lower incidence of complications in endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2016;8: 385-90.

[99]

Kawashima H, Itoh A, Ohno E, et al. Preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in 164 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2013;257: 121-7.

[100]

Maeda T, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Preoperative course of patients undergoing endoscopic nasobiliary drainage during the management of resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2019;26: 341-7.

[101]

Takahashi Y, Sasahira N, Sasaki T, et al. The role of stent placement above the papilla (inside-stent) as a bridging therapy for perihilar biliary malignancy: an initial experience. Surg. Today 2021;51: 1795-804.

[102]

Nakamura S, Ishii Y, Serikawa M, et al. Utility of the inside stent as a preoperative biliary drainage method for patients with malignant perihilar biliary stricture. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2021;28: 864-73.

[103]

Lytras D, Olde Damink SW, Amin Z, et al. Radical surgery in the presence of biliary metallic stents: revising the palliative scenario. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2011;15: 489-95.

[104]

Fukami Y, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Salvage hepatectomy for perihilar malignancy treated initially with biliary self-expanding metallic stents. Surgery 2013;153: 627-33.

[105]

Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K, et al. Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery 1990;107: 521-7.

[106]

Imamura H, Shimada R, Kubota M, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization: an audit of 84 patients. Hepatology 1999;29: 1099-105.

[107]

Nagino M, Kamiya J, Nishio H, et al. Two hundred forty consecutive portal vein embolizations before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer: surgical outcome and long-term follow-up. Ann. Surg. 2006;244: 524-35.

[108]

Muller M, Breuer E, Mizuno T, et al. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: novel benchmark value for surgical and oncological outcomes from 24 expert centers. Ann. Surg. 2021;274: 780-8.

[109]

Higuchi R, Yamamoto M. Indications for portal vein embolization in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2014;21: 542-9.

[110]

Nagino M, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic portal embolization using newly devised catheters. World J. Surg. 1993;17: 520-4.

[111]

Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al. Selective percutaneous transhepatic embolization of the portal vein in preparation for extensive liver resection: the ipsilateral approach. Radiology 1996;200: 559-63.

[112]

Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al. Right or left trisegment portal vein embolization before hepatic trisegmentectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma. Surgery 1995;117: 677-81.

[113]

Madoff DC, Abdalla EK, Gupta S, et al. Transhepatic ipsilateral right portal vein embolization extended to segment IV: improving hypertrophy and resection outcomes with spherical particles and coils. J. Vasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2005;16: 215-25.

[114]

Lang HL, de Santibanes E, Schlitt HJ, et al. 10th anniversary of ALPPS - lessons learned and quo Vadis. Ann. Surg. 2018;269: 114-9.

[115]

Olthof PB, Coelen RJS, Wiggers JK, et al. High mortality after ALPPS for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: case-control analysis including the first series from the international ALPPS registry. HPB 2016;18: 419-27.

[116]

Nagino M. Value of ALPPS in surgery for Klatskin tumours. Br. J. Surg. 2019;106: 1574-5.

[117]

Sugawara G, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. The effect of preoperative biliary drainage on infectious complications after hepatobiliary resection with cholangiojejunostomy. Surgery 2013;153: 200-10.

[118]

Ribero D, Zimmitti G, Aloia TA, et al. Preoperative cholangitis and future liver remnant volume determine the risk of liver failure in patients undergoing resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2016;223: 87-97.

[119]

Olthof PB, Wiggers JK, Groot Koerkamp B, et al. Postoperative liver failure score: identifying patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who can benefit from portal vein embolization. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2017;225: 387-94.

[120]

Yokoyama Y, Nishio H, Ebata T, et al. Value of indocyanine green clearance of the future liver remnant in predicting outcome after resection for biliary cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2010;97: 1260-8.

[121]

Yokoyama Y, Ebata T, Igami T, et al. The predictive value of indocyanine green clearance in future liver remnant for posthepatectomy liver failure following hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection. World J. Surg. 2016;40: 1440-7.

[122]

Chaudhary RJ, Higuchi R, Nagino M, et al. Survey of preoperative management protocol for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at 10 Japanese high-volume centers with a combined experience of 2778 cases. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2019;26: 490-502.

[123]

Shimizu H, Kimura F, Yoshidome H, et al. Aggressive surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma of the left-side predominance: radicality and safety of leftsided hepatectomy. Ann. Surg. 2010;251: 281-6.

[124]

Sugiura T, Okamura Y, Ito T, et al. Left hepatectomy with combined resection and reconstruction of right hepatic artery for Bismuth type I and Ⅱ perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J. Surg. 2019;43: 894-901.

[125]

Nagino M, DeMatteo R, Lang H, et al. Proposal of a new comprehensive notation for hepatectomy: the "New World" terminology. Ann. Surg. 2021;274: 1-3.

[126]

Lang H, van Gulik TM. Extended right-hemihepatectomy is preferred for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2021;274: 33-4.

[127]

Nagino M, Ebata T, Mizuno T. Oncological superiority of right-sided hepatectomy over left-sided hepatectomy as surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2021;274: 31-2.

[128]

Lee YJ, Choi DW, Han S, et al. Comparison analysis of left-side versus right-side resection in Bismuht type Ⅲ hilar cholnagiocarcinoma. Ann. Hepatob. Pancreat. Surg. 2018;22: 350-8.

[129]

Franken LC, Olthof PB, Erdmann JI, et al. Short-and long-term outcomes after hemihepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: does left or right side matter? Hepatob. Surg. Nutr. 2021;10: 154-62.

[130]

Bednarsch J, Czigany S, Lurje I, et al. Left- versus right-sided hepatectomy with hilar en-bloc resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB 2020;22: 437-44.

[131]

Ratti F, Cipriani F, Piozzi G, et al. Comparative analysis of left- versus right-sided resection in Klatskin tumor surgery: can lesion side be considered a prognosti factor? J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2015;19: 1324-33.

[132]

Nagino M. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery: ultimate superextended surgery for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2021: 1-3. 00. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/jhbp.1102.

[133]

Aoki T, Sakamoto Y, Kohno Y, et al. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for biliary cancer: strategies for near-zero operative mortality and acceptable long-term outcome. Ann. Surg. 2018;267: 332-7.

[134]

Nagino M, Clavien PA. Demise of hilar en bloc resection by no-touch technique as surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: dissociation between theory and practice. Ann. Surg. 2021;274: e385-7.

[135]

De Vreede I, Steers JL, Burch PA, et al. Prolonged disease-free survival after orthotopic liver transplantation plus adjuvant chemoradiation for cholangiocarcinoma. Liver. Transplant. 2000;6: 309-16.

[136]

Hassoun Z, Gores GJ, Rosen CB. Preliminary experience with liver transplantation in selected patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surg. Oncol. Clin. 2002;11: 909-21.

[137]

Rea DJ, Heimbach JK, Rosen CB, et al. Liver transplantation with neoadjuvant chemoradiation is more effective than resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2005;242: 451-8.

[138]

Darwish Murad S, Kim WR, Harnois DM, et al. Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, followed by liver transplantation, for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at 12 US centers. Gastroenterology 2012;143: 88-98.

[139]

Nagino M. Surgical treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: resection or transplant? Ann. Surg. 2018;267: 806-7.

[140]

Sugawara G, Nagino M, Nishio H, et al. Perioperative synbiotic treatment to prevent postoperative infectious complications in biliary cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 2006;244: 706-14.

[141]

Nakajima H, Yokoyama Y, Inoue T, et al. Clinical benefit of preoperative exercise and nutritional therapy for patients undergoing hepato-pancreato-biliary surgeries for malignancy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2019;26: 264-72.

[142]

Kawakatsu S, Yamaguchi J, Mizuno T, et al. Early prediction of a serious postoperative course in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: trajectory amalysis of the comprehensive complication index. Ann. Surg. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005162.

[143]

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004;240: 205-13.

[144]

Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with inpatient surgery in Medicare patients. Ann. Surg. 2009;250: 1029-34.

[145]

Endo I, Hirahara N, Miyata H, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and failure to rescue in hepatopancreatoduodenectomy: an analysis of patients registered in the National Clinical Database in Japan. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2021;28: 305-16.

[146]

Komaya K, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Recurrence after curative-intent resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of a large cohort with a close postoperative follow-up approach. Surgery 2018;163: 732-8.

[147]

Nakahashi K, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. How long should follow-up be continued after R0 resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Surgery 2020;168: 617-24.

[148]

Neoptolemos JP, Moor MJ, Cox TF, et al. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma. JAMA 2012;308: 147-56.

[149]

Ebata T, Hirano S, Konishi M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy versus observation in resected bile duct cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2018;105: 192-202.

[150]

Edeline J, Benabdelghani M, Bertaut A, et al. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy or surveillance in resected biliary tract cancer (PRODIGE 12 - ACCORD 18-UNICANCER GI): a randomized phase Ⅲ study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019; 37: 658-67.

[151]

Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer D, et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20: 663-73.

[152]

Shroff RT, Kennedy EB, Bachini M, et al. Adjuvant therapy for resected biliary tract cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019;37: 1015-27.

[153]

Lamarca A, Edeline J, McNamara MG, et al. Current standards and future perspectives in adjuvant treatment for biliary tract cancers. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2020;84: 101936.

[154]

Seita K, Ebata T, Mizuno T, et al. Phase 2 trial for adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for node-positive biliary tract cancer (N-SOG 09). Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2020;27: 2348-56.

[155]

Takahashi D, Mizuno T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Adjuvant S-1 vs gemcitabine for nodepositive perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-adjusted analysis. J. Hepat. Panc. Sci. 2021;28: 716-26.

[156]

Nakachi K, Konishi M, Ikeda M, et al. A randomized phase Ⅲ trial of adjuvant S- 1 therapy vs. observation alone in resected biliary tract cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG1202, ASCOT). Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018;48: 392-5.

iLIVER
Pages 12-24
Cite this article:
Nagino M. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a surgeon's perspective. iLIVER, 2022, 1(1): 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iliver.2022.03.004

1422

Views

1

Crossref

Altmetrics

Received: 19 January 2022
Accepted: 23 March 2022
Published: 05 April 2022
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Return