AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Validation of the AIAD model in ANSYS Fluent for horizontal two-phase flows

Toni Fritz Arnold1Thomas Höhne2( )
Institute of Fluid Dynamics, Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Maschinenwesen, Dresden D-01067, Germany
Department of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Bautzner Landstraße 400, Dresden D-01328, Germany
Show Author Information

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of flows involving free surfaces often use the homogeneous model approach, which focuses on solving a single set of balance equations. This approach assigns unique material properties to each phase but calculates only one shared velocity field. However, significant challenges arise when the phases are not distinctly spatially separated, such as during bubble entrainment in wavy or slug flows. In such scenarios, accurately modeling phase separation becomes difficult. To address this issue for industrial-scale multiphase flows, the Algebraic Interfacial Area Model (AIAD) was developed at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR) in collaboration with ANSYS. The AIAD model adapts to local flow characteristics, such as phase distribution, by applying a transitional algorithm that selects appropriate correlations. This enables differentiation between regions with droplets or bubbles and those dominated by the free surface. In this study, the AIAD model—integrated into the ANSYS Fluent solver—is validated against experimental data from the HAWAC channel for horizontal slug flows. The kω−SST turbulence model with turbulence damping (TD) at the phase boundary is employed. Additionally, the AIAD model incorporates the subgrid wave turbulence (SWT) and droplet entrainment and absorption model (DEAM) submodels. The results demonstrate that the complete AIAD model, including these submodels, provides the most accurate predictions of slug flows compared to simplified AIAD models without submodels.

Graphical Abstract

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow
Pages 727-742

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Arnold TF, Höhne T. Validation of the AIAD model in ANSYS Fluent for horizontal two-phase flows. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2026, 8(4): 727-742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-025-0263-0

12

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 23 July 2024
Revised: 24 April 2025
Accepted: 25 May 2025
Published: 10 September 2026
© The Author(s) 2026

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.