AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Euler–Euler simulation of multi-regime two-phase flows with thin liquid films

Paul Porombka1( )Jan Schlottke2
Institute of Fluid Dynamics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Bautzner Landstraße 400, Dresden 01328, Germany
Mahle International GmbH, Pragstraße 26 - 46, Stuttgart 70376, Germany
Show Author Information

Abstract

In Euler–Euler simulations, the information on the interfacial structure of two-phase flow is lost due to the underlying phase averaging. Suitable interaction force models, which rely on assumptions about the local interfacial structure, are required to close the two-fluid model equations. Recent advances have produced multi-regime closure models, which allow simulations of continuous-dispersed and separated flows within the same domain. Here, a model is presented that extends the multi-regime two-fluid model by a hybrid model for wall-bounded liquid films. Thus, wall films of varying film thickness and length scales can be considered in the Euler–Euler framework. The two-fluid film model (TFFM) is implemented in Star-CCM+ v15.04 and compared against experimental data for horizontal annular flow through an orifice and an expansion. It is found that the presented model can qualitatively reproduce the measured mean liquid volume fraction and film thickness profiles, including film separation and transition to stratified flow. Spurious entrainment of liquid in the gas core, however, deteriorates the quantitative agreement with the experimental data, which can be attributed to limitations in the current model implementation. Finally, the presented model is applied to the simulation of a water separator and compared to a simulation without a hybrid film model. A significant improvement in the predicted phase field and separation efficiency was found with the TFFM, which justifies further research to alleviate the current model limitations.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow
Pages 197-210

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Porombka P, Schlottke J. Euler–Euler simulation of multi-regime two-phase flows with thin liquid films. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2025, 7(2): 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-024-0227-9

1124

Views

11

Crossref

10

Web of Science

12

Scopus

Received: 28 May 2024
Revised: 23 August 2024
Accepted: 07 October 2024
Published: 17 June 2025
© The Author(s) 2025

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.