Journal Home > Volume 6 , Issue 1

The pebble-bed high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) is an advanced nuclear system with inherent safety. The nuclear reactor is operated in high-temperature ranges and its design temperature limit is 1600 °C. It is important to discuss the conduction–radiation heat transfer in the nuclear pebble bed during the thermal hydraulics analysis. Until now, the investigation mainly focuses on large-scale experimental tests, such as the Selbsttätige Abfuhr der Nachwärme (SANA) test by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), high temperature test unit (HTTU) under low gas pressure by North-West University of South Africa, and the pebble bed equivalent conductivity measurement (PBEC) under vacuum conditions for the high temperature gas-cooled reactor pebble bed module (HTR-PM) project by the Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET) of Tsinghua University. In this work, a thermal resistance model was developed to calculate the conduction–radiation effective thermal conductivity of nuclear pebble beds. With the constitutive continuum modeling for conduction, contact resistance, coordination number, and void fraction are considered for physical expressions, and heat conduction in the packed bed will be enhanced directly by higher packing density and more contact. For thermal radiation dominated by the heat transfer process under high temperatures, a sub-cell model with an equivalent resistance network is developed to calculate the radiative exchange factor, and the void fraction effect is implemented by a modification term with thermal ray tracing results. At low packing density, because the thermal rays from the local pebble will travel a further distance until reaching the surrounding pebbles, the local sphere will be in contact with more particles by thermal radiation, and the heat transfer is enhanced. Compared with the empirical correlations, the present model is proven to be applicable for both dense and dilute cases. In the nuclear pebble bed, the present conduction–thermal radiation model agrees generally with experimental data under different temperatures and can be applied in the particle-scale CFD-DEM simulations. The present work provides a meaningful approach for conduction–thermal radiation heat transfer for engineering and nuclear pebble-bed design.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

A thermal resistance model of conduction–thermal radiation heat transfer in pebble-bed nuclear reactors

Show Author's information Hao Wu1Fenglei Niu1Nan Gui2Xingtuan Yang2Jiyuan Tu2,3Shengyao Jiang2( )
1. School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
2. Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
3. School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia

Abstract

The pebble-bed high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) is an advanced nuclear system with inherent safety. The nuclear reactor is operated in high-temperature ranges and its design temperature limit is 1600 °C. It is important to discuss the conduction–radiation heat transfer in the nuclear pebble bed during the thermal hydraulics analysis. Until now, the investigation mainly focuses on large-scale experimental tests, such as the Selbsttätige Abfuhr der Nachwärme (SANA) test by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), high temperature test unit (HTTU) under low gas pressure by North-West University of South Africa, and the pebble bed equivalent conductivity measurement (PBEC) under vacuum conditions for the high temperature gas-cooled reactor pebble bed module (HTR-PM) project by the Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET) of Tsinghua University. In this work, a thermal resistance model was developed to calculate the conduction–radiation effective thermal conductivity of nuclear pebble beds. With the constitutive continuum modeling for conduction, contact resistance, coordination number, and void fraction are considered for physical expressions, and heat conduction in the packed bed will be enhanced directly by higher packing density and more contact. For thermal radiation dominated by the heat transfer process under high temperatures, a sub-cell model with an equivalent resistance network is developed to calculate the radiative exchange factor, and the void fraction effect is implemented by a modification term with thermal ray tracing results. At low packing density, because the thermal rays from the local pebble will travel a further distance until reaching the surrounding pebbles, the local sphere will be in contact with more particles by thermal radiation, and the heat transfer is enhanced. Compared with the empirical correlations, the present model is proven to be applicable for both dense and dilute cases. In the nuclear pebble bed, the present conduction–thermal radiation model agrees generally with experimental data under different temperatures and can be applied in the particle-scale CFD-DEM simulations. The present work provides a meaningful approach for conduction–thermal radiation heat transfer for engineering and nuclear pebble-bed design.

Keywords: thermal radiation, resistance, void fraction, effective thermal conductivity, pebble-bed nuclear reactors

References(28)

Alshehri, S. M., Said, I. A., Usman, S. 2021. A review and safety aspects of modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactors. International Journal of Energy Research, 45: 11479–11492.
An, X., Dong, K., Yang, R., Zou, R., Yu, A. 2021. On the relationships between structural properties and packing density of uniform spheres. Powder Technology, 388: 139–148.
Bu, S., Wang, J., Sun, W., Ma, Z., Zhang, L., Pan, L. 2020. Numerical and experimental study of stagnant effective thermal conductivity of a graphite pebble bed with high solid to fluid thermal conductivity ratios. Applied Thermal Engineering, 164: 114511.
Cheng, G., Gan, J., Xu, D., Yu, A. 2020. Evaluation of effective thermal conductivity in random packed bed: Heat transfer through fluid voids and effect of packing structure. Powder Technology, 361: 326–336.
Cortés, E., Gaviño, D., Calderón-Vásquez, I., García, J., Estay, D., Cardemil, J. M., Barraza, R. 2023. An enhanced and optimized Monte Carlo method to calculate view factors in packed beds. Applied Thermal Engineering, 219: 119391.
German, R. M. 2014. Coordination number changes during powder densification. Powder Technology, 253: 368–376.
Godbee, H. W., Ziegler, W. T. 1966. Thermal conductivities of MgO, Al2O3, and ZrO2 powders to 850°C. II. Theoretical. Journal of Applied Physics, 37: 56–65.
Gui, N., Jiang, S., Yang, X., Tu, J. 2022. A review of recent study on the characteristics and applications of pebble flows in nuclear engineering. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 4: 339–349.
Gusarov, A. V. 2019. Statistical approach to radiative transfer in the heterogeneous media of thin-wall morphology—II: Applications. Journal of Heat Transfer, 141: 012701.
Johnson, E. F., Tarı, İ., Baker, D. 2021. Radiative heat transfer in the discrete element method using distance based approximations. Powder Technology, 380: 164–182.
Johnson, E., Tarı, İ., Baker, D. 2020. A Monte Carlo method to solve for radiative effective thermal conductivity for particle beds of various solid fractions and emissivities. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 250: 107014.
Lund, K. O., Nguyen, H., Lord, S. M., Thompson, C. 1999. Numerical correlation for thermal conduction in packed beds. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 77: 769–774.
Mehrabian, R., Shiehnejadhesar, A., Scharler, R., Obernberger, I. 2014. Multi-physics modelling of packed bed biomass combustion. Fuel, 122: 164–178.
Reutler, H., Lohnert, G. H. 1984. Advantages of going modular in HTRs. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 78: 129–136.
Rouhani, M., Bahrami, M. 2018. Effective thermal conductivity of packed bed adsorbers: Part 2 — Theoretical model. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 123: 1212–1220.
Rousseau, P. G., du Toit, C. G., van Antwerpen, W., van Antwerpen, H. J. 2014. Separate effects tests to determine the effective thermal conductivity in the PBMR HTTU test facility. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 271: 444–458.
Suzuki, M., Kada, H., Hirota, M. 1999. Effect of size distribution on the relation between coordination number and void fraction of spheres in a randomly packed bed. Advanced Powder Technology, 10: 353–365.
Toptan, A., Jiang, W., Hales, J. D., Spencer, B. W., Casagranda, A., Novascone, S. R. 2021. FEA-aided investigation of the effective thermal conductivity in a medium with embedded spheres. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 381: 111355.
Tsotsas, E. 2019. Particle–particle heat transfer in thermal DEM: Three competing models and a new equation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 132: 939–943.
Van Antwerpen, W., du Toit, C. G., Rousseau, P. G. 2010. A review of correlations to model the packing structure and effective thermal conductivity in packed beds of mono-sized spherical particles. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 240: 1803–1818.
Wu, H., Gui, N., Yang, X., Tu, J., Jiang, S. 2016. Effect of scale on the modeling of radiation heat transfer in packed pebble beds. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 101: 562–569.
Wu, H., Gui, N., Yang, X., Tu, J., Jiang, S. 2020. An approximation function model for solving effective radiative heat transfer in packed bed. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 135: 107000.
Wu, H., Zhao, H., Hao, Z., Liu, F., Niu, F. 2021. A non-linear transform approach for conduction-radiation heat transfer in the extended thermal discrete element method. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 176: 121432.
Wu, Y., Ren, C., Yang, X., Tu, J., Jiang, S. 2019. Repeatable experimental measurements of effective thermal diffusivity and conductivity of pebble bed under vacuum and helium conditions. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 141: 204–216.
Yang, R., Zou, R., Yu, A. 2000. Computer simulation of the packing of fine particles. Physical Review E, 62: 3900–3908.
Yun, T. S., Evans, T. M. 2010. Three-dimensional random network model for thermal conductivity in particulate materials. Computers and Geotechnics, 37: 991–998.
Zhang, Z., Liu, L., Yuan, Y., Yu, A. 2001. A simulation study of the effects of dynamic variables on the packing of spheres. Powder Technology, 116: 23–32.
Zhang, Z., Dong, Y., Shi, Q., Li, F., Wang, H. 2022. 600-MWe high-temperature gas-cooled reactor nuclear power plant HTR-PM600. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 33: 1–8.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements

Publication history

Received: 08 June 2023
Accepted: 28 June 2023
Published: 25 November 2023
Issue date: March 2024

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press 2023

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFB1901900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12105101, 12027813), the Fund of Science and Technology on Reactor System Design Technology Laboratory (Grant No. KFKT-05-FW-HT-20220010), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2023MS055), and the Fund of Nuclear Power Technology Innovation Centre (Grant No. HDLCXZX-2021-HD-032).

Return