AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow Article
PDF (8.2 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Towards the efficient modelling of trapped air pockets during squeeze flow

Michael Müller1( ), Steffen Willenbrock1, Lukas Stahl1, Till Vallée2, Holger Fricke2
Institute of Dynamics and Vibrations, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Schleinitzstr. 20, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Fraunhofer-Institut für Fertigungstechnik und Angewandte Materialforschung IFAM, Klebtechnik und Oberflächen, Bremen, Germany
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

In most bonding processes, an adhesive is applied to a substrate in a specific pattern before the second substrate is subsequently pressed against it. During this, the adhesive flows in such a way that, ideally, it completely fills the joint. In practice, however, areas with entrapped air frequently remain in the bonded adhesive layer. Within the scope of a research project, these flows are systematically analyzed in order to identify optimal initial application patterns for the adhesive and substrate geometry to minimise such risks. For this purpose, the authors use an efficient flow model, the partially filled gaps model (PFGM), extended in this study to include the functionality of trapped air pockets. Depending on the volume fractions of air and adhesive, the flow of both phases is computed. Therefore, the model is introduced and fully described, benchmarked with respect to its plausibility and functionality, and results obtained are compared with a CFD calculation. Thereafter, the functionality of openings and closings of the pockets are analyzed. Lastly, the model is then applied to a real scenario created with a Hele–Shaw cell measurement. The benchmark as well as the comparison with the measurement results show the high potential of this technique.

Keywords

adhesive bondingmodellingsqueeze flowmultiphase flowCFD simulationsexperimentsHele–Shaw cell

References

 
Adams, R. D., Cawley, P. 1988. A review of defect types and nondestructive testing techniques for composites and bonded joints. NDT Int, 21: 208–222.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Amar, M. B., Bonn, D. 2005. Fingering instabilities in adhesive failure. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom, 209: 1–16.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Ascione, F. 2016. The influence of adhesion defects on the collapse of FRP adhesive joints. Compos Part B Eng, 87: 291–298.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Baig, C. G., Chun, Y. H., Cho, E. S., Choi, C. K. 2000. Experimental studies on the instabilities of viscous fingering in a Hele–Shaw cell. Korean J Chem Eng, 17: 169–173.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Banea, M. D., Rosioara, M., Carbas, R. J. C., da Silva, L. F. M. 2018. Multi-material adhesive joints for automotive industry. Compos Part B Eng, 151: 71–77.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Barton, C. C., La Pointe, P. R. 2012. Fractals in Petroleum Geology and Earth Processes. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
 
Bertsch, M., Giacomelli, L., Karali, G. 2005. Thin-film equations with “partial wetting” energy: Existence of weak solutions. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom, 209: 17–27.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Chang, C. H., Young, W. B. 2014. Modeling and numerical study of thermal-compression bonding in the packaging process using NCA. Appl Math Model, 38: 3016–3030.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Chester, R. J., Roberts, J. D. 1989. Void minimization in adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes, 9: 129–138.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Clapeyron, É. 1834. Mémoire sur la puissance motrice de la chaleur. Journal de l'École polytechnique, 14: 153–190. (in French)
Google Scholar
 
Darcy, H. 1856. Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon. (in French)
 
Davis, M., Bond, D. 1999. Principles and practices of adhesive bonded structural joints and repairs. Int J Adhes Adhes, 19: 91–105.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Drieschner, M., Petryna, Y., Gruhlke, R., Eigel, M., Hömberg, D. 2018. Failure analysis of adhesive bonds with polymorphic uncertainties: Experiment and simulation. Available at http://congress.cimne.com/eccm_ecfd2018/admin/files/filePaper/p1952.pdf.
 
Ebnesajjad, S., Landrock, A. H. 2014. Adhesives Technology Handbook. New York: William Andrew.
 
Fast, P., Shelley, M. J. 2004. A moving overset grid method for interface dynamics applied to non-Newtonian Hele–Shaw flow. J Comput Phys, 195: 117–142.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Ferziger, J. H., Perić, M., Street, R. L. 2008. Numerische Strömungsmechanik. Berlin: Springer. (in German)
 
Frauenhofer, M., Gormanns, M., Simon, M., Rütters, M., Fricke, H. 2020a. Optimierte wärmeableitung aus energiespeichern für serien-elektrofahrzeuge. Adhäsion KLEBEN & DICHTEN, 64: 32–37. (in German)
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Frauenhofer, M., Gormanns, M., Simon, M., Rütters, M., Fricke, H. 2020b. Optimized heat dissipation of energy storage systems. Adhes Adhes Sealants, 17: 12–17.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Fricke, H., Vallée, T. 2016. Numerical modeling of hybrid-bonded joints. J Adhes, 92: 652–664.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Grunwald, C., Fecht, S., Vallée, T., Tannert, T. 2014. Adhesively bonded timber joints—Do defects matter? Int J Adhes Adhes, 55: 12–17.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Guyott, C. C. H., Cawley, P., Adams, R. D. 1986. The non-destructive testing of adhesively bonded structure: A review. J Adhes, 20: 129–159.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Han, S., Wang, K. K., Cho, S. Y. 1996. Experimental and analytical study on the flow of encapsulant during underfill encapsulation of flip-chips. In: Proceedings of the 46th Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 327–334.
 
Ji, Y. M., Han, K. S. 2014. Fracture mechanics approach for failure of adhesive joints in wind turbine blades. Renew Energy, 65: 23–28.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Karachalios, E. F., Adams, R. D., da Silva, L. F. 2013. Strength of single lap joints with artificial defects. Int J Adhes Adhes, 45: 69–76.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Kaufmann, M., Flaig, F., Müller, M., Stahl, L., Finke, J., Vallée, T., Fricke, H. 2021. Experimental validation of a compression flow model of non-Newtonian adhesives. J Adhes, .
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Khor, C. Y., Mujeebu, M. A., Abdullah, M. Z., Ani, F. C. 2010. Finite volume based CFD simulation of pressurized flip-chip underfill encapsulation process. Microelectron Reliab, 50: 98–105.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Kondic, L., Palffy-Muhoray, P., Shelley, M. J. 1996. Models of non-Newtonian Hele–Shaw flow. Phys Rev E, 54: 4536–4539.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Landgrebe, D., Mayer, B., Niese, S., Fricke, H., Neumann, I., Ahnert, M., Falk, T. 2015. Adhesive distribution and global deformation between hybrid joints. Key Eng Mater, 651: 1465–1471.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Lange, N. A., Dean, J. A. 1985. Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry. New York: McGraw-Hill.
 
Lee, L. H. 2013. Adhesive Bonding. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
 
Li, D. 2008. Encyclopedia of Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Crossref
 
Müller, M., Finke, J., Stahl, L., Tong, Y., Fricke, H., Vallée, T. 2021. Development and validation of a compression flow model of non-Newtonian adhesives. J Adhes, .
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Müller, M., Jäschke, H., Bubser, F., Ostermeyer, G. P. 2014. Simulative studies of tribological interfaces with partially filled gaps. Tribol Int, 78: 195–209.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Müller, M., Ostermeyer, G. P., Bubser, F. 2013. A contribution to the modeling of tribological processes under starved lubrication. Tribol Int, 64: 135–147.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Müller, M., Stahl, L., Ostermeyer, G. P. 2018a. Experimental studies of lubricant flow and friction in partially filled gaps. Lubricants, 6: 110.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Müller, M., Stahl. L., Ostermeyer, G. P. 2020. Studies on the pressure buildup and shear flow factors in the cavitation regime. Lubricants, 8: 82.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Müller, M., Tong, Y., Fricke, H., Vallée, T. 2018b. An efficient numerical model for the evaluation of compression flow of high-viscosity adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes, 85: 251–262.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Müller, M., Tong, Y., Fricke, H., Vallée, T. 2019. Transformation of tribological modelling of squeeze flows to simulate the flow of highly viscous adhesives and sealants in manufacturing processes. PAMM, 19: e201900056.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Müller, M., Völpel, A., Ostermeyer, G. P. 2017. On the influence of fluid dynamics and elastic deformations on pressure buildup in partially filled gaps. Tribol Int, 105: 345–359.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Nguyen, L., Quentin, C., Fine, P., Cobb, B., Bayyuk, S., Yang, H., Bidstrup-Allen, S. A. 1999. Underfill of flip chip on laminates: Simulation and validation. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol, 22: 168–176.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Nithiarasu, P. 2003. An efficient artificial compressibility (AC) scheme based on the characteristic based split (CBS) method for incompressible flows. Int J Numer Methods Eng, 56: 1815–1845.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Paterson, A., Fermigier, M., Jenffer, P., Limat, L. 1995. Wetting on heterogeneous surfaces: Experiments in an imperfect Hele–Shaw cell. Phys Rev E, 51: 1291–1298.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Paterson, L. 1981. Radial fingering in a Hele Shaw cell. J Fluid Mech, 113: 513–529.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Petryna, Y., Künzel, A., Kannenberg, M. 2014. Fault detection and state evaluation of rotor blades. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Nantes, France.
 
Pocius, A. V., Dillard, D. A. 2002. Adhesion Science and Engineering: Surfaces, Chemistry and Applications. The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Crossref
 
Ribeiro, F. M. F., Campilho, R. D. S. G., Carbas, R. J. C., da Silva, L. F. M. 2016. Strength and damage growth in composite bonded joints with defects. Compos Part B Eng, 100: 91–100.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Sengab, A., Talreja, R. 2016. A numerical study of failure of an adhesive joint influenced by a void in the adhesive. Compos Struct, 156: 165–170.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Spyrou, N. 2011. Detaillierte numerische Simulationen von flugtriebwerksrelevanten Zweiphasenströmungen. Ph.D. Thesis. Technische Universität, Germany. (in German)
 
Vallée, T., Fricke, H., Myslicki, S., Kaufmann, M., Voß, M., Denkert, C., Glienke, R., Dörre, M., Henkel, M. K., Gerke, T. 2021. Modelling and strength prediction of pre-tensioned hybrid bonded joints for structural steel applications. J Adhes, .
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Van Wylen, G. J., Sonntag, R. E. 1985. Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics. New York: Wiley.
 
Voß, M., Haupt, J. 2021. Accelerated curing of adhesively bonded G-FRP tube connections—Part I: Experiments. Compos Struct, 268: 113999.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Wan, J. W., Zhang, W. J., Bergstrom, D. J. 2007. Recent advances in modeling the underfill process in flip-chip packaging. Microelectron J, 38: 67–75.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Waugh, R. C. 2016. Development of Infrared Techniques for Practical Defect Identification in Bonded Joints. Switzerland: Springer.
Crossref
 
Yang, J., Peng, C., Xiao, J., Zeng, J., Xing, S., Jin, J., Deng, H. 2013. Structural investigation of composite wind turbine blade considering structural collapse in full-scale static tests. Compos Struct, 97: 15–29.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Zarouchas, D. S., Makris, A. A., Sayer, F., van Hemelrijck, D., van Wingerde, A. M. 2012. Investigations on the mechanical behavior of a wind rotor blade subcomponent. Compos Part B Eng, 43: 647–654.
Crossref Google Scholar
Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow
Volume 5 Issue 1,
March 2023
Pages 29-52
DOI: 10.1007/s42757-021-0125-3
Cite this article:
Müller M, Willenbrock S, Stahl L, et al. Towards the efficient modelling of trapped air pockets during squeeze flow. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2023, 5(1): 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-021-0125-3

694

Views

14

Downloads

4

Crossref

5

Web of Science

4

Scopus

Altmetrics
Received: 08 June 2021
Revised: 21 September 2021
Accepted: 07 October 2021
Published: 19 January 2022
© The Author(s) 2021

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return