AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

CFD validation of condensation heat transfer in scaled-down small modular reactor applications, Part 2: Steam and non-condensable gas

Palash Kumar BhowmikJoshua Paul Schlegel( )Varun KalraSyed AlamSungje HongShoaib Usman
Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science, Missouri University of Science and Technology, 1201 N. State St., Rolla, MO 65409, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

This paper presents the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation and scaling assessment of the condensation heat transfer (CHT) models in the presence of non-condensable gas for the passive containment cooling system (PCCS) of the small modular reactor (SMR). The STAR-CCM+ software with 3D scaled-down SMR containment geometries was used in CFD simulations with steam and non-condensable gas (NCG). The limitations and approximations of the previous studies were resolved to avoid scaling distortion and uncertainties. Air was used as the NCG gas with steam. The multi-component gas model was used to define the steam–NCG mixture, and the condensation-seed parameter was used as the source term for the fluid film model. Three different turbulence models were used to check the heat flux performances and temperature distributions on the coolant side. The heat flux was estimated from the axial coolant bulk temperature, which was identical to the test data reduction method. An implicit-unsteady numerical solver was applied to the conjugate heat transfer models between the gas, liquid, and solid regions. Detailed simulations were performed, and simulation results were validated with the measured parameters experimentally. The condensation heat transfer performance was quantified using non-dimensional numbers and compared for different scaled geometries to identify the scaling distortions.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow
Pages 424-434

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Bhowmik PK, Schlegel JP, Kalra V, et al. CFD validation of condensation heat transfer in scaled-down small modular reactor applications, Part 2: Steam and non-condensable gas. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2022, 4(4): 424-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-021-0113-7

1528

Views

10

Crossref

10

Web of Science

13

Scopus

Received: 20 January 2021
Revised: 30 March 2021
Accepted: 14 May 2021
Published: 21 July 2021
© Tsinghua University Press 2021