AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Influence factors of the numerical model build-up on fluid sloshing

Zhan Liu1( )Cui Li2( )
School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

It is important to predict fluid sloshing in cryogenic fuel storage tanks with an accurate numerical model. In the present paper, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was established to simulate fluid sloshing. The fluid sloshing experiments in an apparent vessel were adopted to be the benchmark and used to validate the numerical model. As most of investigations were conducted with some certain model settings, few are involved on the influence factor on numerical model build-up. Based on the selected sloshing experiments, effects of the numerical time step and phase change factor on fluid sloshing were investigated. The results showed that the time steps of 0.001 and 0.002 s and the phase change factor of 0.1 s-1 could meet the requirement of fluid sloshing prediction. With some valuable conclusions being obtained, the present study may supply some effective references for numerical model building on fluid sloshing.

References

 
Battaglia, L., Cruchaga, M., Storti, M., D’Elía, J., Núñez Aedo, J., Reinoso, R. 2018. Numerical modelling of 3D sloshing experiments in rectangular tanks. Appl Math Model, 59: 357–378.
 
Brackbill, J. U., Kothe, D. B., Zemach, C. 1992. A continuum method for modeling surface tension. J Comp Phys, 100: 335–354.
 
Brizzolara, S., Savio, L., Viviani, M., Chen, Y., Temarel, P., Couty, N., Hoflack, S., Diebold, L., Moirod, N., Iglesias, A. S. 2011. Comparison of experimental and numerical sloshing loads in partially filled tanks. Ships Offshore Struc, 6: 15–43.
 
Chen, Y. G., Djidjeli, K., Price, W. G. 2009. Numerical simulation of liquid sloshing phenomena in partially filled containers. Comput Fluids, 38: 830–842.
 
Chen, Z., Zong, Z., Li, H. T., Li, J. 2013. An investigation into the pressure on solid walls in 2D sloshing using SPH method. Ocean Eng, 59: 129–141.
 
Das, S. P., Hopfinger, E. J. 2009. Mass transfer enhancement by gravity waves at a liquid–vapour interface. Int J Heat Mass Tran, 52: 1400–1411.
 
Djavareshkian, M. H., Khalili, M. 2006. Simulation of sloshing with the volume of fluid method. Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing, 2: 299–308.
 
Elahi, R., Passandideh-Fard, M., Javanshir, A. 2015. Simulation of liquid sloshing in 2D containers using the volume of fluid method. Ocean Eng, 96: 226–244.
 
Grotle, E. L., Æsøy, V. 2018. Dynamic modelling of the thermal response enhanced by sloshing in marine LNG fuel tanks. Appl Therm Eng, 135: 512–520.
 
Grotle, E., Æsøy, V. 2017. Numerical simulations of sloshing and the thermodynamic response due to mixing. Energies, 10: 1338.
 
Gu, X., Wen, J., Tian, J., Li, C., Liu, H., Wang, S. 2019. Role of gravity in condensation flow of R1234ze(E) inside horizontal mini/ macro-channels. Exp Comput Multiphase Flow, 1: 219–229.
 
Himeno, T., Ohashi, A., Anii, K., Daichi, H., Sakuma, Y., Watanabe, T., Inoue, C., Umemura, Y., Negishi, H., Nonaka, S. 2018. Investigation on phase change and pressure drop enhanced by violent sloshing of cryogenic fluid. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA 2018-4755.
 
Himeno, T., Sugimori, D., Ishikawa, K., Umemura, Y., Uzawa, S., Inoue, C., Watanabe, T., Nonaka, S., Naruo, Y., Inatani, Y., et al. 2011. Heat exchange and pressure drop enhanced by sloshing. In: Proceedings of the 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, AIAA 2011-5682.
 
Lee, S. J., Kim, M. H., Lee, D. H., Kim, J. W., Kim, Y. H. 2007. The effects of LNG-tank sloshing on the global motions of LNG carriers. Ocean Eng, 34: 10–20.
 
Lind, S. J., Stansby, P. K., Rogers, B. D. 2016. Incompressible– compressible flows with a transient discontinuous interface using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). J Comput Phys, 309: 129–147
 
Liu, D., Lin, P. 2008. A numerical study of three-dimensional liquid sloshing in tanks. J Comput Phys, 227: 3921–3939.
 
Liu, Z., Feng, Y., Cui, J., Lei, G., Li, Y. 2019a. Effect of excitation types on sloshing dynamic characteristics in a cryogenic liquid oxygen tank. J Aerospace Eng, 32: 04019096.
 
Liu, Z., Feng, Y., Lei, G., Li, Y. 2018. Fluid thermal stratification in a non-isothermal liquid hydrogen tank under sloshing excitation. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 43: 22622–22635.
 
Liu, Z., Feng, Y., Lei, G., Li, Y. 2019b. Fluid sloshing dynamic performance in a liquid hydrogen tank. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 44: 13885–13894.
 
Liu, Z., Feng, Y., Lei, G., Li, Y. 2019c. Hydrodynamic performance on sloshing process in a liquid oxygen tank under intermittent excitation. Cryogenics, 98: 92–101.
 
Liu, Z., Feng, Y., Lei, G., Li, Y. 2019d. Hydrodynamic performance in a sloshing liquid oxygen tank under different initial liquid filling levels. Aerospace Sci Tech, 85: 544–555.
 
Liu, Z., Feng, Y., Lei, G., Li, Y. 2019e. Sloshing behavior under different initial liquid temperatures in a cryogenic fuel tank. J Low Temp Phys, 196: 347–363
 
Liu, Z., Feng, Y., Lei, G., Li, Y. 2019f. Sloshing hydrodynamic performance in cryogenic liquid oxygen tanks under different amplitudes. Appl Therm Eng, 150: 359–371.
 
Liu, Z., Feng, Y., Liu, Y., Yan, J., Li, Y. 2020. Effect of external heat input on fluid sloshing dynamic performance in a liquid oxygen tank. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci, 21: 879–888.
 
Liu, Z., Li, C. 2018. Influence of slosh baffles on thermodynamic performance in liquid hydrogen tank. J Hazard Mater, 346: 253–262.
 
Liu, Z., Li, Y., Jin, Y. 2016. Pressurization performance and temperature stratification in cryogenic final stage propellant tank. Appl Therm Eng, 106: 211–220.
 
Liu, Z., Li, Y., Jin, Y., Li, C. 2017. Thermodynamic performance of pre-pressurization in a cryogenic tank. Appl Therm Eng, 112: 801–810.
 
Liu, Z., Wang, L., Jin, Y., Li, Y. 2015. Development of thermal stratification in a rotating cryogenic liquid hydrogen tank. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 40: 15067–15077.
 
Loots, E., Pastoor, W., Buchner, B., Tveitnes, T. 2004. The numerical simulation of LNG sloshing with an improved volume of fluid method. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2004 23rd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2004-51085.
 
Ludwig, C., Dreyer, M. E., Hopfinger, E. J. 2013. Pressure variations in a cryogenic liquid storage tank subjected to periodic excitations. Int J Heat Mass Tran, 66: 223–234.
 
Ming, P., Duan, W. 2010. Numerical simulation of sloshing in rectangular tank with VOF based on unstructured grids. J Hydrodyn, 22: 856–864.
 
Oliveira, J. M., Kirk, D. R., Schallhorn, P. 2009. Analytical model for cryogenic stratification in a rotating and reduced-gravity environment. J Spacecraft Rockets, 46: 459–465.
 
Shao, J. R., Li, H. Q., Liu, G. R., Liu, M. B. 2012. An improved SPH method for modeling liquid sloshing dynamics. Comput Struct, 100–101: 18–26.
 
Wu, C. H., Chen B. F. 2012. Transient response of sloshing fluid in a three dimensional tank. J Mar Sci Technol, 20: 26–37.
 
Zhang, Y., Wan, D., Takanori, H. 2014. Comparative study of MPS method and level-set method for sloshing flows. J Hydrodyn, 26: 577–585.
 
Zhou, R., Vergalla, M., Chintalapati, S., Kirk, D., Gutierrez, H. 2012. Experimental and numerical investigation of liquid slosh behavior using ground-based platforms. J Spacecraft Rockets, 49: 1194–1204.
Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow
Pages 435-444
Cite this article:
Liu Z, Li C. Influence factors of the numerical model build-up on fluid sloshing. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2022, 4(4): 435-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-020-0099-6

590

Views

7

Crossref

8

Web of Science

10

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 21 August 2020
Revised: 23 October 2020
Accepted: 15 November 2020
Published: 13 January 2021
© Tsinghua University Press 2020
Return