Journal Home > Volume 1 , Issue 4

The understanding of two-phase gas–liquid flows is of utmost importance in a large range of industrial applications, including the petrochemical, pharmaceutical, biochemical, nuclear, and metallurgical industries. At ANSYS, significant effort is being made in assessing the physical force models present in both FLUENT and CFX. This includes the investigation of the interfacial closures (drag, lift, wall lubrication, turbulent dispersion, and virtual mass), heat and mass transfer, cavitation, wall boiling, population balance approaches, bubble breakup and coalescence, and turbulence modeling. This assessment is being done with the objective to conduct an audit/validation of the current models, features, and capabilities, as well as the identification and closing of gaps and differences between CFX and FLUENT. The work presented here is mostly focused on the assessment, implementation, and validation of the drag and lift interfacial closures. The numerical assessment and validation are performed using both analytical and industrial-like test cases for complex bubbly flows (both with wall and bulk void fraction maximums), as well as transitional flow from bubbly to slug regime using the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR) experimental facility known as MT-Loop.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

On the assessment, implementation, validation, and verification of drag and lift forces in gas–liquid applications for the CFD codes FLUENT and CFX

Show Author's information Gustavo Montoya1( )Jay Sanyal1Markus Braun2Mohammed Azhar3
ANSYS, Inc., 10 Cavendish Ct, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
ANSYS Germany GmbH, Birkenweg 14A, 64295 Darmstadt, Germany
ANSYS UK Ltd., 97 Jubilee Ave, Milton, Abingdon OX14 4RW, UK

Abstract

The understanding of two-phase gas–liquid flows is of utmost importance in a large range of industrial applications, including the petrochemical, pharmaceutical, biochemical, nuclear, and metallurgical industries. At ANSYS, significant effort is being made in assessing the physical force models present in both FLUENT and CFX. This includes the investigation of the interfacial closures (drag, lift, wall lubrication, turbulent dispersion, and virtual mass), heat and mass transfer, cavitation, wall boiling, population balance approaches, bubble breakup and coalescence, and turbulence modeling. This assessment is being done with the objective to conduct an audit/validation of the current models, features, and capabilities, as well as the identification and closing of gaps and differences between CFX and FLUENT. The work presented here is mostly focused on the assessment, implementation, and validation of the drag and lift interfacial closures. The numerical assessment and validation are performed using both analytical and industrial-like test cases for complex bubbly flows (both with wall and bulk void fraction maximums), as well as transitional flow from bubbly to slug regime using the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR) experimental facility known as MT-Loop.

Keywords: CFD modeling, CFD validation, multiphase flow, two-fluid model, MT-Loop

References(17)

Burns, A., Frank, T., Hamill, I., Shi, J. 2004. The Favre averaged drag model for turbulent dispersion in Eulerian multi-phase flows. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Paper No. 392.
Ishii, M., Zuber, N. 1979. Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows. AIChE J, 25: 843–855.
Krepper, E., Lucas, D., Frank, T., Prasser, H.-M., Zwart, P. J. 2008. The inhomogeneous MUSIG model for the simulation of polydispersed flows. Nucl Eng Des, 238: 1690–1702.
Krepper, E., Lucas, D., Prasser, H.-M. 2005. On the modelling of bubbly flow in vertical pipes. Nucl Eng Des, 235: 597–611.
Legendre, D., Magnaudet, J. 1998. The lift force on a spherical bubble in a viscous linear shear flow. J Fluid Mech, 368: 81–126.
Lo, S., Bagatin, R., Masi, M. 2000. The development of a CFD analysis and design tool for air-lift reactors. In: Proceedings of the SAIChE 2000 Conference.
Lucas, D., Krepper, E., Prasser, H.-M. 2005. Development of co-current air–water flow in a vertical pipe. Int J Multiphase Flow, 31: 1304–1328.
Mei, R. W., Klausner, J. F. 1994. Shear lift force on spherical bubbles. Int J Heat Fluid Fl, 15: 62–65.
Montoya, G. 2015. Development and validation of advanced theoretical modeling for churn-turbulent flows and subsequent transitions. Doctoral Dissertation. Technischen Universität Berlin.
Moraga, F. J., Bonetto, F. J., Lahey, R. T. 1999. Lateral forces on spheres in turbulent uniform shear flow. Int J Multiphase Flow, 25: 1321–1372.
Rzehak, R., Krepper, E., Ziegenhein, T., Lucas, D. 2014. A baseline model for monodispersed bubbly flows. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on CFD in Oil & Gas, Metallurgical and Process Industries, 83–91.
Saffman, P. G. 1965. The lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow. J Fluid Mech, 22: 385–400.
Saffman, P. G. 1968. Corrigendum to: “The lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow”. J Fluid Mech, 31: 624.
Schiller, L., Naumann, A. 1935. Über die grundlegenden Berechnungen bei der Schwerkraftaufbereitung. Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ing., 77: 318–326.
Tomiyama, A. 1998. Struggle with computational bubble dynamics. Multiphase Sci Tech, 10: 369–405.
Tomiyama, A., Tamai, H., Zun, I., Hosokawa, S. 2002. Transverse migration of single bubbles in simple shear flows. Chem Eng Sci, 57: 1849–1858.
Ziegenhein, T., Rzehak, R., Lucas, D. 2015. Transient simulation for large scale flow in bubble columns. Chem Eng Sci, 122: 1–13.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements

Publication history

Received: 06 March 2019
Revised: 04 May 2019
Accepted: 06 May 2019
Published: 05 December 2019
Issue date: December 2019

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press 2019

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Paul Gilbert and Patrick Sharkey from ANSYS, UK, for their constant support to this project.

Return