Journal Home > Volume 7 , Issue 3

Many space missions require the execution of large-angle attitude slews during which stringent pointing constraints must be satisfied. For example, the pointing direction of a space telescope must be kept away from directions to bright objects, maintaining a prescribed safety margin. In this paper we propose an open-loop attitude control algorithm which determines a rest-to-rest maneuver between prescribed attitudes while ensuring that any of an arbitrary number of body-fixed directions of light-sensitive instruments stays clear of any of an arbitrary number of space-fixed directions. The approach is based on an application of a version of Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle tailor-made for optimal control problems on Lie groups, and the pointing constraints are ensured by a judicious choice of the cost functional. The existence of up to three first integrals of the resulting system equations is established, depending on the number of light-sensitive and forbidden directions. These first integrals can be exploited in the numerical implementation of the attitude control algorithm, as is shown in the case of one light-sensitive and several forbidden directions. The results of the test cases presented confirm the applicability of the proposed algorithm.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Attitude maneuvers avoiding forbidden directions

Show Author's information David Ailabouni1( )Andreas Meister1Karlheinz Spindler2
Institute of Mathematics, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Straße 40, 34132 Kassel, Germany
Applied Mathematics, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Kurt-Schumacher-Ring 18, 65197 Wiesbaden, Germany

Abstract

Many space missions require the execution of large-angle attitude slews during which stringent pointing constraints must be satisfied. For example, the pointing direction of a space telescope must be kept away from directions to bright objects, maintaining a prescribed safety margin. In this paper we propose an open-loop attitude control algorithm which determines a rest-to-rest maneuver between prescribed attitudes while ensuring that any of an arbitrary number of body-fixed directions of light-sensitive instruments stays clear of any of an arbitrary number of space-fixed directions. The approach is based on an application of a version of Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle tailor-made for optimal control problems on Lie groups, and the pointing constraints are ensured by a judicious choice of the cost functional. The existence of up to three first integrals of the resulting system equations is established, depending on the number of light-sensitive and forbidden directions. These first integrals can be exploited in the numerical implementation of the attitude control algorithm, as is shown in the case of one light-sensitive and several forbidden directions. The results of the test cases presented confirm the applicability of the proposed algorithm.

Keywords: attitude control, pointing constraints, optimal control on Lie groups, Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle

References(18)

[1]

Mclnnes, C. R. Large angle slew maneuvers with autonomous Sun vector avoidance. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1994, 17(4): 875-877.

[2]

Spindler, K. Attitude maneuvers which avoid a forbidden direction. Journal of Dynamical and Control Systems, 2002, 8(1): 1-22.

[3]
Bayard, D. S. Advances in precision pointing control for NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope. Technical Report, No. AAS 04-071. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Canada, 2004.
[4]

Cui, H., Cheng, X. Attitude maneuver control of spacecraft with pointing constraints considering unknown input saturation. Journal of Astronautics, 2013, 34(3): 377-383. (in Chinese)

[5]

Wu, C., Xu, R., Zhu, S., Cui, P. Time-optimal spacecraft attitude maneuver path planning under boundary and pointing constraints. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 137: 128-137.

[6]
Dhullipalla, M. H., Hamrah, R., Warier, R. R., Sanyal, A. K. Trajectory generation on SE(3) for an underactuated vehicle with pointing direction constraints. In: Proceedings of the 2019 American Control Conference, 2019: 1930-1935.
DOI
[7]

Nicotra, M. M., Liao-McPherson, D., Burlion, L., Kolmanovsky, I. V. Spacecraft attitude control with nonconvex constraints: An explicit reference governor approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2020, 65(8): 3677-3684.

[8]
Duan, C., Wu, H., Hu, Q., Wang, W. Attitude planning of single-axis underactuated spacecraft with forbidden pointing constraint. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2020: 4412-4416.
DOI
[9]

Celani, F., Bruni, R. Minimum-time spacecraft attitude motion planning using objective alternation in derivative-free optimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2021, 191(2-3): 776-793.

[10]

Bloch, A., Camarinha, M., Colombo, L. Variational point-obstacle avoidance on Riemannian manifolds. Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 2021, 33(1): 109-121.

[11]

Calaon, R., Schaub, H. Constrained attitude maneuvering via modified-Rodrigues-parameter-based motion planning algorithms. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2022, 59(4): 1342-1356.

[12]

Tanygin, S. Fast autonomous three-axis constrained attitude pathfinding and visualization for boresight alignment. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2016, 40(2): 358-370.

[13]

Kjellberg, H. C., Lightsey, E. G. Discretized constrained attitude pathfinding and control for satellites. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2013, 36(5): 1301-1309.

[14]
Feron, E., Dahleh, M., Frazzoli, E., Kornfeld, R. A randomized attitude slew planning algorithm for autonomous spacecraft. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Montreal, Canada, 2001: AIAA2001-4155.
DOI
[15]

Diaz Ramos, M., Schaub, H. Kinematic steering law for conically constrained torque-limited spacecraft attitude control. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2018, 41(9): 1990-2001.

[16]

Lee, U., Mesbahi, M. Feedback control for spacecraft reorientation under attitude constraints via convex potentials. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2014, 50(4): 2578-2592.

[17]

Agrachev, A. A., Sachkov, Y. L. Control Theory from the Geometric Viewpoint. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.

DOI
[18]

Schättler, H., Ledzewicz, U. Geometric Optimal Control. New York: Springer New York, 2012.

DOI
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 28 November 2022
Accepted: 08 May 2023
Published: 16 June 2023
Issue date: September 2023

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2023

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

The work described here was presented as paper ISSFD-2022-147 at the 28th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics, which took place in Beijing (China) from August 29 to September 2, 2022. Partial support for this work by the Klaus Tschira Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return